Field performance of bitumen emulsion Cold Central Plant Recycling (CCPR) mixture with same day and delayed overlay compared with traditional rehabilitation procedures
Source abstract
Abstract
Cold Recycled Mixtures (CRM) offer many benefits, including cost-effectiveness and sustainability. Large existing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) stockpiles that represent an environmental and storage challenge can be used for bitumen emulsion Cold Central Plant Recycling (CCPR). A pavement rehabilitation demonstration project using Cold Recycled Mixture with Bitumen Emulsion (CRM-E) as binder course with 100% RAP was carried out on August 25, 2020. The project was divided into three sections to evaluate the mill and pave strategy using CRM-E as an alternative to traditional Hot Mixture Asphalt (HMA). The wearing course was the same asphalt concrete for the three sections. The difference between Section 1 and 2 that used CRM-E was to either pave the asphalt concrete overlay on the same day or to delay its application for 3 days to give additional time for the CRM-E to cure. Section 3 had no CCPR and consisted of two HMA layers. The field performance of the rehabilitated sections was monitored in 4 phases after 14 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The performance of the sections was assessed based on Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), field rutting measurements and cracking distress surveys. Cores were also taken over time to compare the CRM-E and HMA binder course properties in terms of resilient modulus, dynamic creep, indirect tensile strength and tensile strength ratio. The research showed that CRM-E and HMA performance was similar in terms of FWD deflections, field rutting, in situ cracking, and moisture resistance of the field cores. CRM-E showed superior performance in terms of resilient modulus and dynamic creep compared with asphalt concrete binder course based on testing of field cores taken after 6 and 12 months. The research showed that same day CRM-E HMA overlay is a viable construction option.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Asphalt Institute. Asphalt cold mix recycling. Manual Series No. 20 (MS-20), second Edition, 1986.
2. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA). Basic Asphalt Recycling Manual. ARRA Annapolis, MD, USA, 2001.
3. Maurer G., Bemanian S., and Polish P. Alternative Strategies for Rehabilitation of Low-Volume Roads in Nevada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 1989, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 2007. Pages: 309–320.10.3141/1989-78 ↗
4. Sustainable pavements, environmental, economic, and social benefits of in situ pavement recycling10.3141/2084-11 ↗
5. Stroup-Gardiner, M. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 421: Recycling and Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using In-Place Methods. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.10.17226/14568 ↗
6. Experience with cold in-place recycling as a reflective crack control technique: twenty years later10.3141/1869-06 ↗
7. Structural performance and sustainability assessment of cold central-plant and in-place recycled asphalt pavements: a case study10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.222 ↗
8. Characterization of air voids in cold in-place recycling mixtures using X-ray computed tomography10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.081 ↗
9. Quantifying effects of laboratory curing conditions on workability, compactability, and cohesion gain of cold in-place recycling10.1080/14680629.2020.1753101 ↗
10. Stiffness characterization of cold recycled mixtures10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.065 ↗
11. Time-dependent structural response of full-depth reclamation10.3141/2253-01 ↗
12. A procedure for characterizing the curing process of cold recycled bitumen emulsion mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.091 ↗
13. C. Godenzoni, A. Graziani, M. Bocci, A. Grilli, E. Bocci. Instrumented Test Section for Analyzing the Curing Process of Cold-Recycled Mixtures. 10th International conference on bearing capacity of road, railways and airfields. Athens. June 2017.10.1201/9781315100333-170 ↗
14. Comparing the field and laboratory curing behavior of cold recycled asphalt mixtures for binder courses10.3390/ma13214697 ↗
15. Overview of Project Selection Guidelines for Cold In-place and Cold Central Plant Pavement Recycling. Federal Highway Administration FHWA-HIF-17- 042 TechBrief publication. February 2018: 〈https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/pubs/hif17042.pdf〉.
16. A laboratory and field evaluation of cold recycled mixture for base layer entirely made with reclaimed asphalt pavement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.004 ↗
17. Cold asphalt mix with emulsion and 100% RAP: compaction energy and influence of emulsion and cement content10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118804 ↗
18. Fatigue characteristics of in-service cold recycling mixture with asphalt emulsion and HMA mixture10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.171 ↗
19. Stroup-Gardiner M. Practice and Performance of Cold In-Place Recycling and Cold Central Plant Recycling. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Synthesis 569. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2021. https://doi.org/10.17226/26319.10.17226/26319 ↗
20. Brian K. Diefenderfer, David Jones, Adam J.T. Hand, Benjamin F. Bowers, Gerardo Flintsch. Rapid Tests and Specifications for Construction of Asphalt Treated Cold Recycled Pavements. National Cooperative Highway Research Program 9–62 Study. December 2017.
21. Correlating field and laboratory evolution of curing in Cold In-Place Recycled (CIR) materials10.1177/03611981221085523 ↗
22. ASTM D4123–1982, 1995. Standard Test Method for Indirect Tension Test for Resilient Modulus of Bituminous Mixtures.
23. BS EN 12697–25. Bituminous Mixtures Test methods. Cyclic compression test. British Standards Institution (BSI). 2019.
24. Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia JKR/SPJ/2008-S4 Standard Specification for Road Works. Section 4: Flexible pavement. 2008. 〈http://jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat%20Turun/Standard_Specification_For_Road_WorksFlexible_Pavement.pdf〉.
25. A study of cement modified bitumen emulsion mixtures
26. The impact of cement contents on the properties of asphalt emulsion stabilized cold recycling mixtures
27. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Specifications for highway asphalt pavement recycling. JTG T5521, 2019 (English).
28. Ahmed Saidi, Ayman Ali, Wade Lein, and Yusuf Mehta. Balanced Mix Design Method for Selecting the Optimum Binder Content of Cold In-Place Recycling Asphalt Mixtures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 2673, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 2019. Pages: 526–539.10.1177/0361198119835806 ↗
29. B.K. Diefenderfer, I. Boz, B.F. Bowers. Evaluating Cracking Tests for Performance-Based Design Concept for Cold Recycled Mixtures. International Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference. Chicago, Illinois. July 21–24, 2019.10.1061/9780784482452.022 ↗
30. Proposed tests for cold recycling balanced mixture design with measured impact of varying emulsion and cement contents10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002611 ↗
31. AASHTO PP86. Standard Practice for Emulsified Asphalt Content of Cold Recycled Mixture Designs. 2017.
32. AASHTO MP31. Standard Specification for Materials for Cold Recycled Mixtures with Emulsified Asphalt. 2017.
33. ASTM C150/C150M, 2021. Standard Specification for Portland Cement.
34. AASHTO T 324 ,2019. Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures.
35. Practical method for in-place density measurement of cold in-place recycling mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116731 ↗
36. S. Raschia, T. Chauhan, S. Panwar, A. Carter, A. Graziani, D. Perraton. Effect of Water and Cement Content on the Mechanical Properties of Cold Recycled Mixtures (CRM) with Bitumen Emulsion. International Society for Asphalt Pavements (ISAP) 5th International Symposium on Asphalt Pavements & Environment (APE). September 11–13, Padua, Italy. 2009.
37. H.L. Von Quintus, A.L. Simpson. Back-Calculation of Layer Parameters for LTPP Test Sections, Volume II: Layered Elastic Analysis for Flexible and Rigid Pavements. Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA-RD-01–113. October 2002.
38. Sirous Alavi, Jeffrey F. Lecates and Michael P. Tavares. Falling Weight Deflectometer Usage. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Synthesis 381. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2008.
39. Erland O. Lukanen, Richard Stubstad, Robert Briggs. Temperature Predictions and Adjustment Factors for Asphalt Pavements. Report No. FHWA-RD-98–085. US Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. 2000. E.
40. Horak. Benchmarking the Structural Condition of Flexible Pavements with Deflection Bowl Parameters. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering Vol 50 No 2, Paper 6522, pages 2–9. 2008.