journal article·2022-06Open access

Impact of sulfate damage on the behavior of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars

Rajai Z. Al-Rousan

Abstract

This paper is aimed to analyze the performance of reinforced-with-FRP, sulfate-damaged concrete bridge deck slabs under concentrated loads, using the nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA) method. For experimentation purposes, twenty-seven full-scale models have been prepared to simulate concrete bridge deck slabs, with a length of 3000 mm and a width of 2500 mm. The parameters of the study were: (i) type of reinforcement, as three types were tested: glass FRP (GFRP), carbon FRP (CFRP), and steel; (ii) bottom transverse reinforcement ratio (ρ = 0.38, 0.46, and 0.57); and (iii) sulfate damage level, which consisted of three levels: Level 0 (undamaged), level 1 (73 days), and level 2 (123 days). All of the slabs models were equipped with two parallel girders of steel as supporters. To be able to analyze the models' performance up till failure, the load exerted by sustained truck wheels (87.5 kN CL-625 truck) was simulated by subjecting each slab model to a monotonic single concentrated load, with a contact area of 600 × 250 mm, at the center of the models. The simulated models encountered a punching shear mode of failure. The analysis showed that the models that were strengthened with CFRP and GFRP bars exhibited a remarkable improvement in the models': ultimate load, elastic stiffness, post-cracking stiffness, elastic energy absorption, and post-cracking energy; whereas, there was less influence on the models' ultimate deflection, compared to the ones strengthened with steel.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Experimental study on the coupling effect of sulfate corrosion and loading on the mechanical behavior of steel and H-section beam10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.011 ↗
2. Integration of FRP sheet as internal reinforcement in reinforced concrete beam-column joints exposed to sulfate damaged10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.034 ↗
3. Retrofitting of unreinforced masonry structures and considerations for heritage-sensitive constructions
4. Cyclic loading tests of thin-walled square steel tube beam-column joint with different joint details10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.027 ↗
5. performance of reinforced concrete beam–column joint strengthening by FRP sheets10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.007 ↗
6. Impact of seismic retrofitting on progressive collapse resistance of RC frame structures
7. Shear Behavior of plain concrete beams with DSSF strengthened in flexure with anchored CFRP sheets—effects of DSSF content on the bonding length of CFRP sheets. Case Studies in Construction
8. Cyclic behavior of alkali-silica reaction-damaged reinforced concrete beam-column joints strengthened with FRP composites
9. Impact of anchored holes technique on behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with different CFRP sheet lengths and widths
10. Time to failure for concrete exposed to severe sulfate attack10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01097-9 ↗
11. Flexural behavior of RC beams externally strengthened with CFRP composites exposed to severe environment conditions10.1007/s12205-016-0570-x ↗
12. mechanical behaviours and deterioration mechanism of RC beams under chloride-sulphate environment10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.092 ↗
13. Repair of shear-deficient and sulfate-damaged reinforced concrete beams using FRP composites10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.007 ↗
14. Effect of solution concentrations and replacement levels of metakaolin on the resistance of mortar exposed to magnesium sulfate solution10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.035 ↗
15. Flexural and shear behavior of concrete beams reinforced with 3-D continuous carbon fiber fabric
16. A synopsis about the effect of metakaolin on the durability of Portland cement - an overview
17. Interview with Bluefield Research Group on “Underground Infrastructure: U.S. Water & Wastewater Pipe Network Forecast, 2019–2028,” November 2019.
18. Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures (ISIS) · 2006
19. Canadian Standard Association (CSA), Specification for fiber-reinforced Polymers. CAN/CSA S807-10, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada, 2010, 27 p.
20. Canadian Standard Association (CSA), Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-06, Rexdale Ontario, Canada, 2006.
21. Influence of Reinforcement on the behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP Bars10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:5(449) ↗
22. Finite element analysis of concrete bridge decks reinforced with fiber reinforced polymer bars
23. Optimizing finite element models for concrete bridge assessment with proof load testing
24. Flexural capacity of one-way GFRP concrete slabs10.1680/coma.2011.164.3.143 ↗
25. Performance assessment of steel–concrete composite bridges with subsurface deck deterioration10.1016/j.istruc.2014.12.001 ↗
26. Finite-element modeling and development of equivalent properties for FRP bridge panels10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:2(112) ↗
27. Composite behavior of hybrid FRP-concrete Bridge decks on steel girders10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.005 ↗
28. NLFEA sulfate-damage reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.007 ↗
29. Testing of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs Reinforced with fiber-Reinforced polymer (FRP) bars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.028 ↗
30. ANSYS Inc, 2015. ANSYS user’s manual revision 9.0 SAS IP.
31. Flexural members with confined concrete10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
32. ACI B 318-Building code requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute International, 2014.
33. Bathe, K.J. Finite Element Procedures. Prentice-Hall 1996, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, ISBN-13: 978-0-979004902.
34. Effect of Sulfates on bond behavior between carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheets and concrete, Materials and Design10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.018 ↗