Mechanical behaviors of “easy cracking zones” of precast rectangular utility tunnels
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a single tubular section of the rectangular utility tunnel project in Shenyang city, China was simulated by applying a Finite Element Method. To increase the simulation accuracy, reinforcing steel bars were practically added to the utility tunnel model. Using the equivalent static loading method, the potential failure modes of rectangular utility tunnel at different buried depths were equivalently modeled by changing the imposed loads on the roof and side wall. Uniform pressure was applied on the top surface of roof, and a linear change in lateral earth pressure was extended on the external surface of side wall. Two tensile stress concentration zones were observed on the top surface of the roof, and one tensile stress concentration zone was observed on the external surface of side wall, easily leading to cracking on the surface concrete of these zones. These tensile stress concentration zones are named as “easy cracking zones” in this study. The effect of span size and corner type of rectangular utility tunnel on the easy cracking zones was then studied; the results provide a theoretical reference for the future design of rectangular utility tunnels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysing utility tunnels and highway networks coordination dilemma10.1016/j.tust.2008.07.004 ↗
2. An analysis of utility tunnel viability in urban areas10.1080/10286600600562129 ↗
3. A web-based tunneling-induced building/utility damage assessment system: TURISK10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00067-1 ↗
4. Human factors engineering in utility tunnel design10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00041-4 ↗
5. A novel method for risk assessment of cable fires in utility tunnel10.1155/2019/2563012 ↗
6. Al-Bataineh · 2013
7. Condition assessment of the buried utility service infrastructure10.1016/j.tust.2011.10.011 ↗
8. Numerical simulation of shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake excitation10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.023 ↗
9. Promoting the urban utilities tunnel technique using a decision-making approach10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00041-5 ↗
10. Strategic decision support system for utility tunnel’s planning applying A’WOT method10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.009 ↗
11. Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2012.08.007 ↗
12. Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis10.1007/s11803-010-0037-x ↗
13. Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated utility tunnel
14. Shaking table tests on seismic behavior of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete tunnel lining10.1016/j.tust.2019.02.019 ↗
15. Development and applications of common utility tunnels in China10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.006 ↗
16. On the internal blast loading of submerged floating tunnels in concrete with circular and rectangular cross-sections10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.074 ↗
17. Stability of rectangular tunnel in cohesionless soils
18. A probabilistic method to analyze collapse failure of shallow rectangular tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.029 ↗
19. Mechanical behavior of quasi-rectangular segmental tunnel linings: further insights from full-scale ring tests10.1016/j.tust.2018.05.016 ↗
20. Numerical research on seismic response characteristics of shallow buried rectangular underground structure10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.030 ↗
21. Seismic vulnerability assessment of rectangular cut-and-cover subway tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.021 ↗
22. A closed-form solution for the seismic racking and rocking behavior of rectangular tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.002 ↗
23. Numerical modelling of web crippling failures in cold-formed steel unlipped channel sections10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.007 ↗
24. The numerical analysis of transmission tower-line system wind-induced collapsed performance
25. Seismic evaluation of a multitower connected building by using three software programs with experimental verification
26. Seismic resistance and displacement mechanism of the concrete footing
27. A nonlinear model to apply beam-column joint shear failure in analysis of RC moment resisting frames10.1016/j.istruc.2019.07.011 ↗
28. Modelling of two dimensional reinforced concrete beam-column joints subjected to monotonic loading10.1260/1369-4332.18.9.1461 ↗
29. Behaviour of headed shear stud in composite beams with profiled metal decking10.1260/1369-4332.15.9.1547 ↗
30. Numerical limit load analysis of 3D pressure vessel with volume defect considering creep damage behavior10.1155/2015/204730 ↗
31. Punching shear behavior of slab–column connections embedded with steel skeletons10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.052 ↗
32. Numerical analysis and experimental validation of reinforced foamed concrete beam containing partial cement replacement
33. Numerical simulation and field test studies on mechanical behavior of steel plate girder strengthened by external prestressed tendon10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.048 ↗
34. Experimental and numerical investigation on the response of stiffened panels subjected to lateral impact considering material failure criteria10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.036 ↗
35. Numerical evaluation of the hysteretic behavior of concentrically braced frames and buckling restrained brace frame systems10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.023 ↗
36. Effect of void ratio on K0 of a sand by means of triaxial stress-path testing10.1007/s10706-017-0324-7 ↗
37. Barik · 2010 · 1
38. Numerical investigation of load-carrying capacity of GFRP-Reinforced rectangular concrete members using CDP model in ABAQUS
39. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams through externally bonded FRP sheets and near surface mounted FRP bars
40. FE analysis of shot-peening-induced residual stresses of AISI 304 stainless steel by considering mesh density and friction coefficient10.1080/02670844.2018.1470817 ↗