journal article·2021-12Open access

Compressive behaviour and environmental evaluation of sludge-derived masonry walls

Yue Liu, Yan Zhuge, Christopher W.K. Chow, Alexandra Keegan, Danda Li, Phuong Ngoc Pham, Luo Li

Abstract

The Paris Agreement, with its target of net-zero emissions by 2050, has forced the concrete industry to reduce its energy consumption and carbon emissions. Therefore, the development of green concrete with a lower environmental impact is urgently required. In this case study, alum sludge was used as both sand and cement replacement in concrete blocks, and the compressive behaviour of concrete blocks and constructed masonry walls was first investigated. For cement replacement, the strength of blocks decreased with increasing alum sludge ash (ASA) content when the cement replacement ratio was higher than 10% by weight. These results were attributed to the fact that the filler effect and pozzolanic reaction of ASA compensated for the cement dilution effect at a moderate replacement ratio. However, the cement dilution effect dominated the mechanism with further ASA addition. For sand replacement, 10% oven-dried alum sludge addition degraded the mechanical performance of blocks significantly due to high organic content, which might hinder cement hydration. The compression behaviour of masonry walls was also influenced by alum sludge, and the testing results showed that the sludge addition increased ductility of the masonry wall but decreased the strength insignificantly. Therefore, the sludge-derived blocks were suitable for masonry application. Furthermore, a life cycle assessment model was developed based on the designed sludge-derived cement supply chain in South Australia. The obtained results indicate that the annual reduced greenhouse gas emissions were around 1,3339,549 tons, which equaled to the amount of greenhouse gas released from 28,898 passenger vehicles driven for a year.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Towards sustainable concrete10.1038/nmat4930 ↗
2. Sulfate attack resistance of sustainable concrete incorporating various industrial solid wastes10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.337 ↗
3. Recycle option for metallurgical by-product (Spent Foundry Sand) in green concrete for sustainable construction10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.255 ↗
4. M. Berry, D. Cross, J. Stephens, Changing the environment: an alternative “Green” concrete produced without Portland cement, Proc., World of Coal Ash Conf., Lexington, KY, USA, 2009.
5. The potential use of drinking water sludge ash as supplementary cementitious material in the manufacture of concrete blocks10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105291 ↗
6. Reuse of drinking water treatment sludge in mortar as substitutions of both fly ash and sand based on two treatment methods10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122330 ↗
7. Cementitious composites containing alum sludge ash: an investigation of microstructural features by an advanced nanoindentation technology10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124286 ↗
8. Properties of mortar incorporating untreated and treated drinking water treatment sludge10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122558 ↗
9. Recycling drinking water treatment sludge into eco-concrete blocks with CO2 curing: durability and leachability10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141182 ↗
10. Properties and microstructure of concrete blocks incorporating drinking water treatment sludge exposed to early-age carbonation curing10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121257 ↗
11. Utilization of drinking water treatment sludge in concrete paving blocks: microstructural analysis, durability and leaching properties10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110352 ↗
12. Constructive approaches toward water treatment works sludge management: an international review of beneficial reuses10.1080/10643380600776239 ↗
13. P. Maiden, P. Chier, M. Warnecke, R. Boysen, M. Hearn, M. Chapman, Alum Sludge Re-Use, Investigation (10OS-42) Prepared by GHD and Centre for Green Chemistry (Monash University) for The Smart Water Fund, Victoria, ACTEW Water & Seawater, Melbourne, Australia, 2015.
14. A novel type of controlled low strength material derived from alum sludge and green materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.078 ↗
15. Durability properties of multiple-blended binder concretes incorporating thermally activated alum sludge ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.149 ↗
16. Durability against wetting–drying cycles of water treatment sludge–fly ash geopolymer and water treatment sludge–cement and silty clay–cement systems10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001351 ↗
17. Characterization and pozzolanic properties of calcined alum sludge10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.10.042 ↗
18. BSEN771, Specification for masonry units. Clay masonry units, British Standards Institution, 2011.
19. K. Willam, A. Mohammadipour, R. Mousavi, A.S. Ayoub, Failure of unreinforced masonry under compression, Structures Congress 2013: Bridging Your Passion With Your Profession, 2013: pp. 2949–2961.10.1061/9780784412848.257 ↗
20. Experimental investigation of brickwork behaviour under shear, compression and flexure10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.025 ↗
21. Experimental characterization of stone masonry in shear and compression10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.045 ↗
22. AS 3972, General purpose and blended cements, Standards Australia, 2010.
23. Use of recycled aggregates in molded concrete bricks and blocks10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00019-3 ↗
24. ASTM C305, Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2020.
25. ASTM C1437, Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2020.
26. AS 3700, Masonry Structures, Standards Australia, 2018.
27. AS 1012.9, Compressive strength tests— Concrete, mortar and grout specimens, Standards Australia, 2014.
28. AS 4456.4, Determining compressive strength of masonry units, Standards Australia, 2003.
29. SA Water, 2019–20 South Australian Water Corporation Annual Report, in: S. Water (Ed.) Annual Report, SA Water, Adelaide SA, 2020.
30. CN cement, Cement Plants located in Australia, 2021. 〈https://www.cemnet.com/global-cement-report/country/australia〉.
31. The micromechanical signature of high-volume natural pozzolan concrete by combined statistical nanoindentation and SEM-EDS analyses10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.10.004 ↗
32. Experimental investigation of compressive failure in masonry brick assemblages made with soft brick10.1617/s11527-016-0926-1 ↗
33. Drinking water treatment plant residuals management technical report
34. Opportunities for water treatment sludge re-use
35. Biodiesel CO2 emissions: a comparison with the main fuels in the Brazilian market10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.09.006 ↗
36. Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions of biodiesel production from oil derived from wastewater and wastewater sludge10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.046 ↗
37. H. Ismael, Earth moving Equipment function and standard Productivity, 2013. 〈https://planningengineer.net/earth-moving-equipment-function-and-standard-productivity/〉 (accessed 21 January 2021).
38. Properties and microstructure of concrete blocks incorporating drinking water treatment sludge exposed to early-age carbonation curing10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121257 ↗
39. Ezyquip Hire, Front End Loaders, in: Ezyquip Hire (Ed.), 2020.
40. Australian Bureau of Statistics, FUEL CONSUMPTION AND EMISSIONS, 2010. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1370.0–2010~Chapter~Fuel%20consumption%20and%20emissions%20(4.9.4) (accessed 6 October 2020).
41. Estimating the Fuel Efficiency Technology Potential of Heavy-Duty Trucks in Major Markets Around the World
42. N.-O. Nylund, K. Erkkilä, Heavy-duty truck emissions and fuel consumption simulating real-world driving in laboratory conditions, in: VTT Processes (Ed.) DEER Conference, VTT Processes, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2005.
43. The potential use of drinking water sludge ash as supplementary cementitious material in the manufacture of concrete blocks
44. Feasibility and carbon footprint analysis of lime-dried sludge for cement production10.3390/su12062500 ↗
45. U.S.E.P. Agency · 2020