journal article·2025-07Open access

Clustering approach for crack detection in GPR data: Influence of infilling material on detectability

Mercedes Solla, Norberto Fernández, Ahmed Elseicy, Jorge Pais

Abstract

Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a non-destructive method widely used for detecting cracks and other subsurface defects in concrete pavements. The effectiveness of GPR in detecting cracks can be significantly influenced by the infilling material present in the cracks. This work presents an approach based on clustering algorithms, to automatically highlight cracks in concrete slabs. In particular, the crack detection problem is cast as an anomaly detection scenario, where the clustering algorithm is used to discern between anomalous and non-anomalous A-Scans in a radargram, the former considered a potential sign of a crack. In order to cluster the time series of the A-Scans, the usage of a K-Spectral Centroid (KSC) algorithm is proposed, though a comparison with the popular K-means algorithm is also provided. Different crack sizes and infilling materials were simulated to analyze their influence on detectability. Understanding the properties of these materials and their impact on GPR signal reflection, absorption, and transmission is crucial for accurate crack detection. The results have demonstrated that infillings showing large dielectric contrast with concrete have enhanced crack detection. Moreover, GPR data collection was conducted in both perpendicular and parallel broadside orientations. The results obtained with the perpendicular broadside orientation are equivalent for both KSC and K-means, whereas for the parallel broadside orientation KSC outperforms K-means. According to these results, clustering algorithms can be successfully applied to the problem of crack detection from GPR data, thus contributing valuable information for decision-making in maintenance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Solla. (2025). GPR data: simulated cracks in laboratory specimens [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14918577.
2. Sensors on vehicles (SENSOVO) – proof-of-concept for road surface distress detection with wheel accelerations and ToF camera data collected by a fleet of ordinary vehicles10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.419 ↗
3. Road surface anomaly assessment using low-cost accelerometers: a machine learning approach10.3390/s22103788 ↗
4. Road condition monitoring using vehicle built-in cameras and GPS sensors: a deep learning approach10.3390/vehicles5030051 ↗
5. Geophysics: Fundamentals and Applications in Structures and Infrastructure
6. A review of GPR applications on transport infrastructures: troubleshooting and best practices10.3390/rs13040672 ↗
7. Field observations and numerical models of GPR response from vertical pavement cracks10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.006 ↗
8. A, A three dimensional approach for tracking cracks in bridges using GPR10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.12.010 ↗
9. Approach to identify cracking in asphalt pavement using GPR and infrared thermographic methods: preliminary findings10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.11.006 ↗
10. Laboratory observation of cracks in road pavements with GPR10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.022 ↗
11. NDT assessment of rigid pavement damages with ground penetrating radar: laboratory and field tests10.1080/10298436.2020.1778692 ↗
12. Machine learning for anomaly detection: a systematic review10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083060 ↗
13. Cluster analysis-based anomaly detection in building automation systems
14. Clustering-based anomaly detection in multivariate time series data10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106919 ↗
15. GamRec: A Clustering Method Using Geometrical Background Knowledge for GPR Data Preprocessing
16. M. Ester, H. Kriegel, J. Sander, X. Xu (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'96). AAAI Press, 226–231.
17. Buried pipe localization using an iterative geometric clustering on GPR data10.1007/s10462-013-9410-2 ↗
18. GPR data analysis using multi-agent and clustering approaches: a tool for technical management of water supply systems10.1016/j.dsp.2013.12.012 ↗
19. An automatic GPR B-scan image interpreting model10.1109/TGRS.2018.2799586 ↗
20. GPR-based automatic identification of root zones of influence using HDBSCAN10.3390/rs13061227 ↗
21. Density-Based Clustering Based on Hierarchical Density Estimates
22. Clustering-based threshold model for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks with ground-penetrating radar10.3141/2522-08 ↗
23. Ground penetrating radar-based deterioration assessment of RC bridge decks10.1108/CI-08-2019-0076 ↗
24. Data acquisition and structural analysis for bridge deck condition assessment using ground penetration radar10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001645 ↗
25. H. Liu, J. Zheng, J. Yu, C. Xiong, W. Li, J. Deng (2023). Clustering of Asphalt Pavement Maintenance Sections Based on 3D Ground-Penetrating Radar and Principal Component Techniques. Buildings, 13(7), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071752.10.3390/buildings13071752 ↗
26. J.B. MacQueen (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In L. M. Le Cam & J. Neyman (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol. 1, pp. 281–297.
27. Innovative method for recognizing subgrade defects based on a convolutional neural network10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.081 ↗
28. L. Zhang, F. Yang, Y. Daniel Zhang, Y.J. Zhu, Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, USA, 2016, 3708 – 3712. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533052.10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533052 ↗
29. Detection of concealed cracks from ground penetrating radar images based on deep learning algorithm10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121949 ↗
30. GPR-based detection of internal cracks in asphalt pavement: a combination method of DeepAugment data and object detection10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111281 ↗
31. Vision-guided crack identification and size quantification framework for dam underwater concrete structures
32. Underground defects detection based on GPR by fusing simple linear iterative clustering phash (SLIC-Phash) and convolutional block attention module (CBAM)-YOLOv810.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365959 ↗
33. Jaewon Yang, Jure Leskovec, Patterns of temporal variation in online media, In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (WSDM '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 177 – 186, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935863.10.1145/1935826.1935863 ↗
34. Ground Penetrating Radar: Fundamentals, Methodologies and Applications in Structures and Infrastructure
35. Resolution of GPR bowtie antennas: an experimental approach10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.05.003 ↗
36. Jol · 2009
37. Laboratory characterization of a GPR antenna for high-resolution testing: radiation pattern and vertical resolution10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.007 ↗
38. Efficient GPR data acquisition to detect underground pipes10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.002 ↗
39. M. Rasol, S. Santos-assunçao, J.C. Pais, V. Sossa, M. Solla, Laboratory Tests in Rigid Pavement. In Near Surface Geoscience 2019;10th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, edited by EAGE. The Hague, Netherlands: EAGE.10.3997/2214-4609.201902575 ↗
40. gprMax: open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for Ground Penetrating Radar10.1016/j.cpc.2016.08.020 ↗
41. J. Leskovec. K-Spectral Centroid (Matlab implementation). Available at: 〈https://snap.stanford.edu/data/ksc.html〉.
42. Assessing rebar corrosión through the combination of nondestructive GPR and IRT methodologies10.3390/rs11141705 ↗