Monitoring and explainable prediction technique for density of hot mix asphalt during pavement construction via intelligent compaction technology
Source abstract
Abstract
During the construction of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) pavements, compaction is crucial for ensuring the pavement's ultimate performance. Traditionally, in-place density is monitored using in situ spot tests with non-destructive density gauges (nuclear or non-nuclear) calibrated against core sample measurements. However, these density spot tests are often conducted at different intervals, hindering timely assessment. Intelligent compaction (IC) has emerged to enhance this process, equipping rollers with sensors to improve HMA compaction. This study aims to monitor the density of the asphalt pavement and develop predictive models for HMA density during construction, utilizing intelligent compaction measurement values (ICMVs), lanes, and pass counts. Data were collected from a construction project in Pakistan, including IC data from vibratory rollers and non-nuclear gauge (NND) density measurements. Machine learning methods—specifically support vector regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting—were applied and enhanced with a chaotic firefly algorithm to develop these predictive models. The robust model was interpreted using Shapley’s adaptive explanations (SHAP) to assess the influence of ICMVs on NND. The results revealed that the model's predictions closely aligned with measured NND values, with light gradient boosting demonstrating superior performance during validation and achieving an R 2 value of 0.989 and RMSE less than 1.172. The SHAP analysis demonstrated a significant influence of ICMVs, particularly the compaction control value (CCV) and resonant meter value (RMV) with NND. Furthermore, the machine learning model's results outperform previous studies' findings. These findings suggest that utilizing ICMVs and machine learning predictions may effectively replace traditional NND density tests, providing easier and more accurate access for density determination during asphalt construction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Neural Networks and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Handbook Hot-Mix Asphalt Paving. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) PO Box 96716 2000 20090 26716.
2. D.H. Andrewski, Density measurements of hot mix asphalt (hot mix asphalt)Pavements, Final Report; Indiana DOT (2003).
3. Å.J. Sandström, C.B. Pettersson, Intelligent systems for QA/QC in soil compaction, n.d.
4. H.F. Thurner, Å. Sandström, European workshop compaction of soils and granular materials continuous compaction control, CCC contrôle continu de compactage, CCC, 2000.
5. D.J. White, P.K. Vennapusa, H.S. Gieselman Rachel Goldsmith Luke Johanson Bradley Fleming Caleb Douglas, Accelerated implementation of intelligent compaction technology for embankment subgrade soils, aggregate base, and asphalt pavement materials Final Report Kansas US69 Field Project, n.d. 〈www.eerc.iastate.edu〉.
6. Mooney · 2010
7. Intelligent compaction with vibratory rollers: feedback control systems in automatic compaction and compaction control10.3141/1868-13 ↗
8. S. Nazarian, M. Mazari, G. Chang, R. Aldouri, J. Beltran, Intelligent compaction roller retrofit kit validation, 2015. 〈www.ntis.gov〉.
9. LIBSVM: A Library for support vector machines10.1145/1961189.1961199 ↗
10. Fhwa, A study on intelligent compaction and in-place asphalt density, n.d.
11. C. Savan, K. Ng, K. Ksaibati, Implementation of Intelligent Compaction Technologies for Road Constructions in Wyoming (MPC-15-281), n.d.
12. R. Schmitt, C. Rao, H. Von Quintus, Non-Nuclear Density Testing Devices and Systems to Evaluate In-Place Asphalt Pavement Density, 2007.
13. S. Yoon, M. Hastak, J. Lee, Intelligent Compaction of Asphalt Pavement Implementation, West Lafayette, IN, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315524.10.5703/1288284315524 ↗
14. F. David Rogge, M. Adam Jackson, Compaction and measurement of field density for oregon open-graded (F-mix) asphalt pavement, final report SPR 386, 1999.
15. Artificial neural network–based intelligent compaction analyzer for real-time estimation of subgrade quality10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001089 ↗
16. H.F. Thurner, Quality Assurance and Self Control in Road Construction Advanced Measurement Technology, n.d.
17. Prediction of permanent deformation in asphalt pavements using a novel symbiotic organisms search–least squares support vector regression10.1007/s00521-018-3426-0 ↗
18. Prediction of pavement performance: application of support vector regression with different kernels10.3141/2589-15 ↗
19. Support vector regression to predict asphalt mix performance10.1002/nag.718 ↗
20. S. Commuri, M. Zaman, A Novel Neural Network-Based Asphalt Compaction Analyzer A Novel Neural Network-Based Asphalt Compaction Analyzer A Novel Neural Network-Based Asphalt Compaction Analyzer, 2006.
21. A machine-learning approach for extracting modulus of compacted unbound aggregate base and subgrade materials using intelligent compaction technology
22. Roller-integrated compaction monitoring for hot-mix asphalt overlay construction10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000602 ↗
23. Investigation of the correlations between the field pavement in-place density and the intelligent compaction measure value (ICMV) of asphalt layers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123439 ↗
24. In-time density monitoring of in-place asphalt layer construction via intelligent compaction technology10.1007/978-981-99-2392-2 ↗
25. Study of regression algorithms and influent factors between intelligent compaction measurement values and in-situ measurement values
26. Compaction meter on vibrating rollers for improved compaction control
27. H and S.A. Thurner, Continuous compaction control, CCC, Intl. Conf. on Compaction, Paris (1980) 237–245.
28. Sandström · 1994
29. Vapnik · 1995
30. Smola · 2004
31. Automated pavement patch detection and quantification using support vector machines10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000724 ↗
32. F. Seraj, B.J. van der Zwaag, A. Dilo, T. Luarasi, P. HavingaRoADS: a road pavement monitoring system for anomaly detection using smart phones, in: 2016: pp. 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29009-6_7..10.1007/978-3-319-29009-6_7 ↗
33. L. BreimanRandom forests, Mach. Learn, Mach Learn 45 (2001) 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.2001.
34. J.H. Friedman, 999 reitz lecture greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine 1, 2001.10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
35. Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis10.1016/j.aap.2019.105405 ↗
36. An ensemble tree-based prediction of Marshall mix design parameters and resilient modulus in stabilized base materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132833 ↗
37. T. Chen, C. Guestrin XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, association for computing machinery: pp. 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.2016.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
38. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting model for predicting dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123642 ↗
39. G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, T.-Y. Liu, LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, n.d. 〈https://github.com/Microsoft/LightGBM〉.
40. An improved chaotic firefly algorithm for global numerical optimization10.2991/ijcis.2018.25905187 ↗
41. X.-S. Yang, Firefly Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization, in: 2009: pp. 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04944-6_14.10.1007/978-3-642-04944-6_14 ↗
42. S.M. Lundberg, P.G. Allen, S.-I. Lee, A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, n.d. 〈https://github.com/slundberg/shap〉.
43. A novel approach to explain the black-box nature of machine learning in compressive strength predictions of concrete using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)
44. Performance improvement of empirical models for estimation of global solar radiation in India: A k-fold cross-validation approach
45. R. Kohavi, A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, in: Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, Morgan-Kaufmann, 1995, pp. 1137–1145.