Behavior of one-way steel, BFRP, and GFRP reinforced concrete slabs under monotonic and cyclic loadings: Experiments and analyses
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper experimentally investigated the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of one-way basalt and glass fibre-reinforced polymers (BFRP and GFRP) reinforced concrete (RC) slabs compared with that of traditional steel RC ones. A total of nine 2000×700×100 mm RC slabs, including three BFRP RC (BRC), three GFRP RC (GRC), and three steel RC (SRC) slabs, were tested. The results indicated that the behaviour of BRC and GRC slabs was governed by the elastic characteristic of FRP bars, resulting in a more uniform curvature of the slabs. The behaviour and failure modes of BRC and GRC slabs were comparable with those of SRC slabs. The similarity and difference were characterized by the rupture of FRP bars and the yielding of steel bars. Postcrack stiffness of BRC and GRC slabs was significantly lower than that of SRC slabs and was marginally affected by the effect of cyclic loading. The ultimate loads and ultimate deflections of BRC and GRC slabs were ∼2.0 and 1.6–2.0 times those of SRC slabs, respectively. Concepts of ductility, safety factor, and warning index were introduced and quantified for FRP RC slabs. BRC and GRC slabs had a significantly higher ductility (8.5–10.4) than SRC slabs (5.1–6.2), showing a highly ductile behaviour. SRC slabs had a safety factor of 1.0–1.1, while BRC and GRC slabs had a significantly higher safety factor of 3.8, showing their lower failure probability of BRC and GRC slabs when they are designed at a similar load as SRC slabs. The warning index of SRC slabs was 14.4–30.2, and that of BRC and GRC slabs was 65.1–71.6 and 63.9–86.0, respectively. The strength, ductility, safety factor, recovery, and warning index of BRC and GRC slabs were high, confirming their advanced characteristics. Under cyclic loading, BRC and GRC slabs have significantly larger stiffness degradations (4.4 %–7.2 %/cycle) than SRC slabs (1.62 %−3.2 %/cycle). The results of theoretical analyses showed that the strengths of BRC and GRC slabs can be reasonably predicted. The outcomes indicate the high potential use of FRP reinforcement for slabs in engineering practice.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Benmokrane, H. Rahman, Durability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction: Proceedings of the First International Conference (CDCC'98), Sherbrooke (Quebec) Canada, August 5-7, 1998, ..
2. A. Mufti, M. Onofrei, B. Benmokrane, N. Banthia, M. Boulfiza, J. Newhook, B. Bakht, G. Tadros, P. Brett, Durability of GFRP Reinforced Concrete in Field Structures, Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement for reinforced concrete structures (FRPRCS-7), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2005, pp. 1361-1378.
3. Behaviour of one-way concrete slabs reinforced with CFRP grid reinforcements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.007 ↗
4. Concrete Slabs Reinforced with FRP or Steel Reinforcements10.1177/0731684408089487 ↗
5. Testing of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.028 ↗
6. Flexural behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced concrete slab strips reinforced with BFRP and GFRP bars10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.016 ↗
7. Serviceability of one-way high-volume fly ash-self-compacting concrete slabs reinforced with basalt FRP bars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.044 ↗
8. Flexural behavior of basalt fiber–reinforced concrete slab strips with BFRP bars: experimental testing and numerical simulation10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001002 ↗
9. Nonlinear finite element analysis of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.024 ↗
10. Flexural behavior of HSC one way slabs reinforced with basalt FRP bars
11. Performance of two-way concrete slabs reinforced with basalt and carbon FRP rebars10.3390/jcs6030074 ↗
12. Punching shear behavior of FRP reinforced concrete slabs under different opening configurations and loading conditions
13. Flexural behavior and crack width prediction of UHPC slabs reinforced with FRP bars
14. Behavior of GFRP reinforced concrete slabs with openings strengthened by CFRP strips10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101033 ↗
15. Impact response of hybrid FRP-steel reinforced concrete slabs10.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.013 ↗
16. Evaluation of impact response of thermal-damaged FRP-RC slabs: Effects of FRP bar type and concrete cover thickness
17. Dynamic performance of concrete slabs reinforced with steel and GFRP bars under impact loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.038 ↗
18. Effect of global stiffness on the force response of thin GFRP reinforced concrete slabs subjected to impact loading10.1016/j.tws.2023.111300 ↗
19. Shear behavior of post-tensioned FRP-reinforced concrete slabs under static and fatigue loading10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.066 ↗
20. Shear capacity of continuous concrete slabs with CFRP reinforcement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126117 ↗
21. Prediction of punching shear capacities of two-way concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.05.009 ↗
22. Punching shear strength and deformation for FRP-reinforced concrete slabs without shear reinforcements
23. A new formula of punching shear strength for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) or steel reinforced two-way concrete slabs10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113471 ↗
24. Shear behaviour of one-way high strength plain and FRC slabs reinforced with basalt FRP bars10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116234 ↗
25. Experimental and numerical investigation of compressive membrane action in GFRP-reinforced concrete slabs10.3390/polym15051230 ↗
26. Fire tests on full-scale FRP reinforced concrete slabs10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.060 ↗
27. Evaluating the fire endurance of concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars: considerations for a holistic approach10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.013 ↗
28. Structural behaviour of FRP reinforced concrete slabs in fire10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111058 ↗
29. Fire resistance of concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars. Part I: experimental investigations on the mechanical behavior10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.025 ↗
30. Fire resistance of concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars. Part II: experimental results and numerical simulations on the thermal field10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.026 ↗
31. Fire behaviour of GFRP-reinforced concrete slab strips. Effect of straight and 90° bent tension lap splices10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114904 ↗
32. Impact of elevated temperature on the behavior of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with GFRP bars10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.079 ↗
33. ASTM, ASTM C39/C39M-18, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens., ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States., 2001.
34. ASTM, ASTM A615/A615M-20 Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States., 2020.
35. ASTM, ASTM D7205/D7205M 2021, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States, 2021.
36. ACI, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19), American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331, U.S.A., 2019.
37. Repair of fire-damaged RC slabs with basalt fabric-reinforced shotcrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.043 ↗
38. Strengthening of one-way reinforced concrete slabs using near surface mounted bars
39. Combined effects of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer flexural reinforcements and post installed shear dowels on the performance of flat slabs10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111848 ↗
40. ASCE · 2007