journal article·2023-12Open access

Reuse of engineering waste soil and recycled fine aggregate to manufacture eco-friendly unfired clay bricks: Experimental assessment, data-driven modeling and environmental friendliness evaluation

Weiwei Xiong, Yicun Chen, Jinjun Xu, Zhe Zhang, Chaofeng Liang

Abstract

In order to explore the possible application of engineering waste soil (EWS) and recycled fine aggregate (RFA) in cement-based unfired clay bricks (CUCB), this paper utilizes the orthogonal experiment to investigate the combined utilization of EWS and RFA to fabricate eco-friendly CUCB. The study employs an L9 (34) orthogonal table with four factors and three levels for designing mix proportions. The factors include the ratios of water-to-cement (w/c), cement-to-EWS (c/e), RFA-to-EWS (r/e) and additive content. CUCB were tested for density, compressive strength, and flexural strength; and the impact of each factor on these properties was analyzed. The test results reveal that the eco-friendly CUCB exhibit lightweight characteristics and desirable mechanical properties. The ratio of flexural strength-to-compressive strength for eco-friendly CUCB ranges from 0.23 to 0.28, indicating that eco-friendly CUCB have good toughness. Data-driven models was developed to construct the relationships between target properties (i.e., density, compressive strength, and flexural strength) and four factors. The optimal mix proportion for physical and mechanical properties was determined to be w/c=0.55, c/e =0.3, r/e =0.4 and additive content=10%, with predicted compressive and flexural strengths of 19.68 MPa and 5.19 MPa, respectively. In addition, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was performed to figure out the strength enhancement mechanism of eco-friendly CUCB with varying mix proportions. Environmental friendliness evaluation shows that the optimal mix pro-portion is more environmentally friendly to fabricate CUCB from the perspective of strength-normalized carbon footprint and energy consumption. Using large quantity of cement cannot increase the compressive strength and only acts as filler in the microstructure of eco-friendly CUCB.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Carbon emission-based life cycle assessment of rural residential buildings constructed with engineering bamboo: a case study in china
2. Life cycle assessment of steel-glued laminated bamboo (glubam) hybrid truss in china10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113218 ↗
3. Experimental investigation on physical and mechanical properties of excavated soil- and fine recycled concrete aggregate-based unfired clay bricks containing compound additives
4. Recycled aggregate from c&d waste & its use in concrete - a breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.003 ↗
5. Load-carrying capacity of circular recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns under axial compression: reliability analysis and design factor calibration
6. Effects of coral, recycled and natural coarse aggregates on the mechanical properties of concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.111 ↗
7. A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029 ↗
8. Compressive strength and elastic modulus of rbac: an analysis of existing data and an artificial intelligence based prediction
9. Feasibility assessment for partial replacement of fine aggregate to attain cleaner production perspective in concrete: a review10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.130 ↗
10. Reuse of construction spoil in china: Current status and future opportunities10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125742 ↗
11. Novel prediction models for composite elastic modulus of circular recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tubes10.1016/j.tws.2019.106317 ↗
12. Effects of concrete waste on characteristics of structural fired clay bricks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119362 ↗
13. Characterization of sustainable interlocking burnt clay brick wall panels: an alternative to conventional bricks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117190 ↗
14. Sustainable unfired bricks manufacturing from construction and demolition wastes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.026 ↗
15. Utilisation of dewatered extracted soil in concrete blocks produced with portland cement or alkali-activated slag: engineering properties and sustainability
16. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of concrete building blocks incorporating recycled concrete aggregates10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.069 ↗
17. Use of recycled concrete aggregates from precast block for the production of new building blocks: an industrial scale study10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104786 ↗
18. Sustainable reuse of excavated soil and recycled concrete aggregate in manufacturing concrete blocks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127917 ↗
19. Properties of using excavated soil waste as fine and coarse aggregates in unfired clay bricks after dry-wet cycles
20. National Standard of China, Common portland cement, GB 175–2007. Beijing: China Standards Press: 2007.
21. National Standard of China, Pebble and crushed stone for construction, GB/T 14685–2022. China Standards Press: Beijing, 2022.
22. Calcium chloride acceleration in ordinary portland cement10.1680/jmacr.17.00079 ↗
23. Fly ash addition in clayey materials to improve the quality of solid bricks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.001 ↗
24. Modification experimental research on alkali-activated rammed earth material for hanzhong rural traditional houses
25. Estimation of the permeability of silica fume cement concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.033 ↗
26. Effects of accelerator-water reducer admixture on performance of cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118187 ↗
27. Industrial Standard of Building Materials of China, Construction wastes recycled aggregate solid brick, JG/T 505–2016. China Standard Press: Beijing, 2016.
28. National Standard of China, Test methods for wall bricks, GB/T 2542–2012. China Standards Press: Beijing, 2012.
29. A novel material for lightweight concrete production10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.05.002 ↗
30. Mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene lightweight aggregate concrete and brick10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.030 ↗
31. National Stanard of China, Uniform technical code for wall materials used in buildings, GB 50574–2010. China Building Industry Press: Beijing, 2010.
32. Life cycle carbon emission reduction potential of a new steel-bamboo composite frame structure for residential houses
33. Carbon emission analyses of concretes made with recycled materials considering co2 uptake through carbonation absorption10.1002/suco.201900577 ↗
34. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010 ↗
35. A calculation model for compressive strength of cleaner earth-based construction with a high-efficiency stabilizer and fly ash10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.153 ↗
36. Goedkoop M., Oele M., Leijting J., Ponsioen T., Meijer E. Introduction to lca with simapro. https://wwwpre-sustainabilitycom/download/SimaPro8IntroductionToLCApdf,. 2016.
37. Comparison of embodied energies of ordinary portland cement with bayer-derived geopolymer products10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.008 ↗
38. Design and assessment of eco-friendly ultra-high performance concrete with steel slag powder and recycled glass powder10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118356 ↗
39. Comparative assessment of embodied energy of recycled aggregate concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.118 ↗
40. Multi-scale study on synergistic effect of cement replacement by metakaolin and typical supplementary cementitious materials on properties of ultra-high performance concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125082 ↗