Performance of SMA Mix modified with waste plastic and fiber
Source abstract
Abstract
Waste materials are harmful to the environment when incinerated, dumped in open water, or landfilled. Present-day society faces a serious challenge from the growing amount of waste materials and the need for a sustainable solution. Due to the limited amount of natural raw materials, there is a global need to minimize the amount of waste. Using suitable waste materials, such as waste plastic, as additives in asphalt mixtures is a viable strategy, offering an alternative to virgin materials like polymer-modified asphalt binders. This research studied the influence of waste fibers as a stabilizer and recycled Polyethylene waste as an asphalt modifier in the Stone Mastic Asphalt mix (SMA). Two categories of the SMA mixes were produced, base and modified mixes, with three different mixes under each category. The rheological properties of the Recycled Polyethylene Modified Asphalt (RPMA) have been assessed using different Recycled Polyethylene (RP) dosages at the upper-performance temperature. In addition, two Recycled Fibers (RF), cellulose and jute, were used as stabilizing materials for SMA mixes. The impact of RP and RF on the SMA mixes was investigated using three tests: Drain-down resistance, moisture sensitivity, and rutting performance. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess the effect of the additives on the measured SMA properties. The results showed that adding RP and RF improved the SMA mixes' ability to hold the asphalt and fine material inside the mix and solved the drain-down problem by 81.43%. In addition, adding RP as an asphalt modifier greatly enhanced the moisture and rutting resistance by 47.5% and 93%, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Benchmarking pavement practices in data-scarce regions – case of Saudi Arabia10.1080/10298436.2019.1606914 ↗
2. Modeling resilient modulus and temperature correction for Saudi Roads10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:4(298) ↗
3. Quality of pavement construction in Saudi Arabia10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2001)6:3(129) ↗
4. A review on solutions for improving rutting resistance of asphalt pavement and test methods10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.151 ↗
5. State-of-the-art review on permanent deformation characterization of asphalt concrete pavements10.3390/su15021166 ↗
6. Effect of type of aggregate on permanent deformation of bituminous concrete mixes10.1080/14680629.2015.1091374 ↗
7. Rutting parameters for asphalt concrete for different aggregate structures10.1080/10298430903578960 ↗
8. Utilization of inferior quality aggregates in asphalt mixes: A systematic review
9. K. Almbaidheen G. Al-Khateeb W. Ziada M. Abulkhair Eff. Differ. Aggreg. Grada Rutting Perform. Asph. Mixtures UAE Roadways 2022 622 633 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_45.10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_45 ↗
10. Recycling of waste materials for asphalt concrete and bitumen: a review10.3390/ma13071495 ↗
11. Designing and construction SMA mixtures, state of the practice
12. Analysis of the behavior of SMA mixtures with different fillers through the semicircular bend (SCB) fracture test10.3390/ma12020288 ↗
13. Comparison of stone matrix asphalt mixtures with polymer-modified bitumen and shredded waste plastics10.1080/14680629.2015.1124799 ↗
14. Blazejowski · 2016
15. Using waste plastic bottles as additive for stone mastic asphalt10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.016 ↗
16. Performance of PET and nano-silica modified stone mastic asphalt mixtures
17. Dynamic properties and fatigue life of stone mastic asphalt mixtures reinforced with waste tyre rubber
18. Solid waste management in Saudi Arabia
19. Roadmap for development of waste-to energy facility in Saudi Arabia
20. Solid waste issue: sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003 ↗
21. An overview of the environmental pollution and health effects associated with waste landfilling and open dumping10.1007/s11356-022-21578-z ↗
22. Environmental impact: concept, consequences, measurement ☆
23. Life cycle assessment of roadworks in United Arab Emirates: Recycled construction waste, reclaimed asphalt pavement, warm-mix asphalt and blast furnace slag use against traditional approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120531 ↗
24. Sustainable road design: promoting recycling and non-conventional materials10.3390/su11216106 ↗
25. Sustainability assessment of green asphalt mixtures: a review10.3390/environments6060073 ↗
26. Recycling of waste materials for asphalt concrete and bitumen: a review10.3390/ma13071495 ↗
27. M. Buncher, M. Anderson, Asphalt Mix Design Methods, Manual Series No. 02 (MS-2), 7th Edition, 2014.
28. Dalhat · 2017
29. Asphalt surface mixtures with improved performance using waste polymers via dry and wet processes10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002022 ↗
30. Asphalt binder modification with plastomeric compounds containing recycled plastics and graphene10.3390/ma15020516 ↗
31. UV-aging resistance of packaging Waste PE modified asphalts10.1080/03602550902995059 ↗
32. The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: a review
33. Performance of recycled plastic waste modified asphalt binder in Saudi Arabia10.1080/10298436.2015.1088150 ↗
34. Performance evaluation of utilization of waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.015 ↗
35. Dynamic properties of stone mastic asphalt mixtures containing waste plastic bottles10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.054 ↗
36. Evaluation of the performance of two Australian waste-plastic-modified hot mix asphalts10.3390/recycling7020016 ↗
37. Investigate the use of recycled polyvinyl chloride (PVC) particles in improving the mechanical properties of stone mastic asphalt (SMA)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126780 ↗
38. Properties of stone matrix asphalt modified with polyvinyl chloride and nano silica10.3390/polym13142358 ↗
39. Biodegradation of polyethylene: a brief review10.1186/s13765-020-00511-3 ↗
40. McDaniel · 2015
41. Applications of synthetic, natural, and waste fibers in asphalt mixtures: a citation-based review10.3390/polym15041004 ↗
42. American Association of State Highway and Transportation (AASHTO), Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA), AASHTO Designation: M 325–08 (2012), 2015.
43. Rutting and fatigue properties of cellulose fiber-added stone mastic asphalt concrete mixtures10.1155/2019/5604197 ↗
44. Hybrid modification of stone mastic asphalt with cellulose and basalt fiber10.1155/2020/5671256 ↗
45. Volumetric properties and resilient modulus of stone mastic asphalt incorporating cellulose fiber10.1088/1757-899X/712/1/012028 ↗
46. Behavior of natural fiber in stone matrix asphalt mixtures using two design methods10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000815 ↗
47. Performance evaluation of stone matrix asphalt using indonesian natural rock asphalt as stabilizer10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.09.007 ↗
48. Rubber modified binders as an alternative to cellulose fiber – SBS polymers in Stone Matrix Asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.028 ↗
49. Use of Jute Fibre in Stone Matrix Asphalt10.1080/14680629.2004.9689971 ↗
50. Charles S. Hughes, Designing and Constructing SMA Mixtures— State-of-the-Practice, 2002.
51. Recycled polyethylene waste as binder stabilizer for SMA mix in gulf environment
52. Analysis of waste polyethylene (PE) and its by-products in asphalt binder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122492 ↗
53. Review on laboratory preparation processes of polymer modified asphalt binder
54. Using waste plastics as asphalt modifier: a review
55. Storage stability and high-temperature performance of asphalt binder modified with recycled plastic10.1080/14680629.2016.1207554 ↗
56. Habib · 2015
57. 2011 National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. doi: 10.17226/14524.
58. Effects of asphalt binder modifying with polypropylene on moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures with thermodynamically concepts10.3311/PPci.11570 ↗
59. Estimating the moisture damage of asphalt mixture modified with nano zinc oxide10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x ↗
60. Effects of moisture damage on asphalt mixtures
61. Investigate the effect of using polymeric anti-stripping additives on moisture damage of hot mix asphalt10.1080/19648189.2018.1517697 ↗
62. Evaluation of the effect of nano-TiO 2 on the adhesion between aggregate and asphalt binder in hot mix asphalt10.1080/19648189.2016.1229227 ↗
63. Assessing moisture damage of asphalt-aggregate systems using principles of thermodynamics: effects of recycled materials and binder aging10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002846 ↗
64. Influence of gradation on asphalt mix rutting resistance measured by Hamburg Wheel Tracking test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117674 ↗
65. A criterion of asphalt pavement rutting based on the thermal-visco-elastic-plastic model10.1080/10298436.2020.1792470 ↗
66. A review on solutions for improving rutting resistance of asphalt pavement and test methods10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.151 ↗
67. Integrated experimental and numerical study on permanent deformation of asphalt pavement at intersections10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000745 ↗
68. Evaluation of asphalt binder rutting parameters10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.058 ↗
69. Montgomery · 2017
70. 2011 National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. doi: 10.17226/14524.
71. Robert N. Hunter, The Shell Bitumen Handbook, in: 6th edition, ICE Publishing, 2015: p. 567.10.1680/tsbh.58378 ↗
72. Stabilizing and reinforcing effects of different fibers on asphalt mortar performance10.1007/s12182-014-0011-8 ↗
73. Warm mix asphalt technology: An up-to-date review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122128 ↗