journal article·2022-06Open access

Study of engineering properties of low-pH self-compacting concrete for concrete plug

Wei-Chien Wang, Jia-Chen Xue, Wei-Hsing Huang

Abstract

Engineered Barrier Systems (EBS) is the primary concept in the design of the Geological Disposal Facility (GDF). In the design of EBS, bentonite is usually used as a buffer/backfill material. Due to its unique design, the concrete plug, used to close the junction between the transport tunnel and the disposal tunnel, is made of self-compacting concrete. Because the high pH solution in normal concrete reduces the performance of bentonite, low-pH self-compacting concrete with pH value less than 11 must be used to manufacture concrete plug. The silica fume (SF) and fly ash (FA) were used as mineral admixtures to discuss the effect of the mineral admixture addition level, Increased use of cementitious materials, and w/p on the engineering properties of Low-pH Self-Compacting Concrete (LPSCC). The test result shows that adding SF and FA could effectively prolong the setting time. Using only SF, the initial setting time of the mix increased up to 4.2 h with the addition of 40 wt% SF, while the combination of 40 wt% SF + 10 wt% FA could also increase the initial setting time to 3.92 h, which was much longer than 2 h working time requirement. Furthermore, at 90 days of curing, the pH value of each mixture was lower than 11, while the compressive strength enhanced to 118–132% compared to the control group. This addition could increase compactness, which leads to relatively strong sulfate resistance. The compressive strength could be enhanced by increasing the cementitious materials, which in turn, increases the pH and dry shrinkage. The LPSCC would lose strength when the w/p was reduced. The SF reacted with Ca(OH)2 in the LPSCC to generate a C-S-H gel. It was the primary factor in the drop of pH. The existence of SF and FA improved the pore structure in the matrix, compacting the structure of LPSCC. All that has been stated above are the dominant mechanism for improving the engineering properties. The pH value of mixture B300W29 was only 10.6 at 90 d, and the compressive strength could reach 61.66 MPa. Moreover, its drying shrinkage was about 0.047% at 90 d, and 0.055% at 150 d. Therefore, it should be considered as a potential material for concrete plug. The swelling property of bentonite was tested to validate the LPSCC material. No evident influence on the swelling property of bentonite was found. Replacing the conventional concrete with the designed material in disposal facilities can effectively enhance safety.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Geotechnical and construction materials studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Bowen, M. (2021). “Forging a Path Forward on US Nuclear Waste Management: Options for Policy Makers.” Center on Global Energy Policy at SIPA, Columbia University.
2. Nuclear energy: status and future limitations10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.040 ↗
3. Schneider, M.,Harms, R.,Jungjohann, A. and Thurmann, A. (2019). “World Nuclear Waste Report 2019 - Focus Europe.” HBS, Germany.
4. Radioactive waste disposal: global experience and challenges
5. Development of geological disposal concepts10.1016/S1569-4860(06)09003-6 ↗
6. Pusch, R. and Svemar, C. (2004). “Comparison of Repository Concepts &Recommendations for Design and Construction of Future Safe Repositories.” International Progress Report IPR-04–55, SKB, Stockholm.
7. Current status of nuclear
8. Geological disposal of nuclear waste: a primer10.2113/gselements.12.4.233 ↗
9. Development and application of low-ph concretes for structural purposes in geological repository systems
10. SKB. (2017). “Safety Functions, Performance Targets and Technical Design Requirements for A KBS-3V Repository.” Posiva SKB Report 01, Kärnbränslehantering AB and Posiva Oy.
11. Haaramo, M., and Lehtonen, A. (2009). “Principle Plug Design for Deposition Tunnels.” POSIVA Working Report 2009–38, Posiva, Finland.
12. Calcium and sodium bentonite for hydraulic containment applications10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(438) ↗
13. Thermal-mechanical behavior of compacted GMZ Bentonite10.3208/sandf.51.1065 ↗
14. On the hydro-mechanical behaviour of MX80 bentonite-based materials10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.09.003 ↗
15. SKB. (2010). “Design, production and initial state of the buffer,”. SKB TR-10–15, Sweden, Stockholm.
16. SKB. (2010). “Design, production and initial state of the backfill and plug in deposition tunnels,”. SKB TR-10–16, Sweden, Stockholm.
17. A method for predicting alkali ion concentrations in cement pore solutions10.1680/adcr.1987.1.1.5 ↗
18. Modeling diffusion of an alkaline plume in a clay barrier10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.03.007 ↗
19. Mineralogical and microstructural changes accompanying the interaction of Boom Clay with ordinary Portland cement10.1680/adcr.2001.13.4.175 ↗
20. The Fate of Smectite in KOH Solutions10.2138/am.2006.2151 ↗
21. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. (2010). “Geological Disposal-Generic Disposal System Technical Specification.” NDA Report No. NDA/RWMD/044, NDA, UK.
22. Modelling Concrete Interaction with A Bentonite Barrier10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1876 ↗
23. Bodén, A. and Sievänen, U. (2005). “Low-pH injection grout for deep repositories-Summary report from a co-operation project between NUMO (Japan), Posiva (Finland) and SKB (Sweden),” SKB R-05–40, Sweden, Stockholm.
24. Formulating a low-alkalinity, high-resistance and low-heat concrete for radioactive waste repositories.” R&D on Low-pH cement for a geological repository, second low-pH workshop, Enresa
25. Savage, D., and Benbow, S. (2007). “Low pH Cements,” SKI Report 2007:32, Sweden, Stockholm.
26. Design and characterization of low-heat and low-alkalinity cements10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.12.002 ↗
27. Development of low-alkali cement for application in A JAEA URL”
28. Design of Low-pH Cementitious Materials Based on Functional Requirements
29. Vogt, C., Lagerblad, B., Wallin, K., Baldy, F. and Jonasson, J.-E. (2009). “Low pH Self-Compacting Concrete for Deposition Tunnel Plugs.” SKB R-09–07, SKB, Stockholm.
30. Holt, E., Leivo, M. and Vehmas, T. (2014). “Low-pH Concrete Developed for Tunnel End Plugs Used in Nuclear Waste Containment,” Concrete Innovation Conference 2014, June 11–13. Oslo, Norway.
31. Vehmas, T., Schnidler, A., Löija, M., Leivo, M. and Holt, E. (2017). “Reference Mix Design and Castings for Low-pH Concrete For Nuclear Waste Repositories.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First Annual Workshop of the HORIZON 2020 CEBAMA Project(KIT Scientific Reports; 7734), Barcelona, Spain.
32. Vehmas, T., Leivo, M., Holt, E., Alonso, M.C., García, J.L., Fernández, Á., Isaacs, M., Rastrick, E., …Schäfer,T. (2018). “Cebama Reference Mix Design for Low-pH Concrete and Paste, Preliminary Characterisation.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second Workshop of the HORIZON 2020 CEBAMA Project (KIT Scientific Reports 7752), Espoo, Finland.
33. Collepardi, M., and M. Valente. (2006). “Recent Developments in Superplasticizers.” in Proc., 8th CANMET/ACI Int. Conf.: Superplasticizers and other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, 1–9. Detroit: American Concrete Institute.
34. Bamforth, P.B., Baston, G.M.N., Berry, J.A., Glasser, F.P., Heath, T.G., Jackson, C.P., Savage, D. and Swanton, S.W. (2012). “Cement Materials for Use As Backfill, Sealing and Structural Materials in Geological Disposal Concepts. A Review of Current Status,” Serco, RP0618–252A, UK.
35. Utilization of fly ash with silica fume and properties of portland cement-fly ash-silica fume concrete”10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.003 ↗
36. Effects of nano-SiO2 on early strength and microstructure of steam-cured high volume fly ash cement system10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.214 ↗
37. Development of high-volume low-lime and high-lime fly-ash-incorporated self-consolidating concrete10.1680/macr.2007.59.2.97 ↗
38. Influence of addition of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on properties of high performance concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003025 ↗
39. Effect of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on large amounts of fly ash cements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.069 ↗
40. SENO, Y., NAKAYAMA, M., SUGITA, Y., YANAI, K. and Fujita, T. (2016). “Basic Properties of the Concrete using the Low Alkaline Cement (HFSC) Developed.” JAEA-Research 2016–011, Hokkaido, Japan. (in Japanese).
41. Aggregates and the deformation properties of concrete
42. Bodén, A. and Pettersson, S. (2011). “Development of rock bolt grout and shotcrete for rock support and corrosion of steel in low-pH cementitious materials.” SKB R-11–08, SKB, Stockholm.
43. Richard, V. (2012). “Low-pH concrete plug for sealing the KBS-3V deposition tunnels.” SKB R-11–04, SKB, Stockholm.
44. Deterioration of swelling pressure of compacted Gaomiaozi bentonite induced by heatcombined with hyperalkaline conditions10.1016/j.sandf.2019.12.008 ↗
45. Effects of hyperalkaline solutions on the swelling pressure of compacted Gaomiaozi (GMZ) bentonite from the viewpoint of Na+, cations and OH– anions10.1016/j.clay.2018.04.023 ↗
46. Reactivity of the cement-bentonite interface with alkaline solutions using transport cells10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.02.016 ↗
47. Effects of pH and temperature on the swelling pressure and hydraulic conductivity of compacted GMZ01 bentonite10.1016/j.clay.2014.08.002 ↗
48. Effect of synthetic water and cement solutions on the swelling pressure of compacted Gaomiaozi(GMZ) bentonite: the Beishan site case, Gansu, China10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.08.002 ↗