Performance evaluation of waste glass in soil improvement: Influence of particle size of waste glass on mechanical, microstructural, and durability characteristics
Source abstract
Abstract
The accumulation of waste glass (WG) from construction and demolition waste is detrimental to the environment due to its imperishable nature; therefore, it is crucial to investigate a sustainable way to recycle and reuse the WG. To address this issue, this study examined the mechanical strength, microstructural characteristics, and environmental durability—specifically under wet-dry (WD) and freeze-thaw (FT) cycles—of WG obtained from construction and demolition waste, with a focus on its suitability as a binding material for soil improvement applications. Firstly, sand and WG were mixed, and an alkali solution was injected into the mixture, considering various parameters, including WG particle size, mixing proportions, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) concentration, and curing time. Subsequently, the effect of WG grain sizes on micromorphology characteristics and mineralogical phases was evaluated before and after the treatment through X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). The results revealed that reducing the WD particle size and increasing the WG/S ratio significantly improved the strength of the WG-treated samples. Additionally, decreasing the NaOH concentration and extending the curing time also positively influenced their strength. The UCS test results indicate that the particle size of WG significantly influenced the strength development of the samples, as the maximum compressive strength increased from 1.42 MPa to 7.82 MPa with the decrease in particle size. Although the maximum UCS values of the samples varied with different WG particle sizes, the values exceed the minimum criterion of 0.80 MPa required for use as a road substructure, as specified in the ASTM D4609 standard. Moreover, as WG grain size decreased, more geopolymer gels formed, continuing to fill the voids and making the overall structure denser, and the changes during geopolymerization were confirmed by XRD, SEM, FTIR, and UPV analysis. The optimum WG/S ratio was found to be 20%, with strength increasing by approximately 3.88 times higher as the WG/S ratio shifted from 5% to 20%. In addition, the optimum NaOH concentration was determined to be 10 M, as higher molarities led to a decrease in strength. Moreover, UPV results indicate that WG-treated sand soils exhibited UPV values 9.4–13 times greater than untreated soils. The WD and FT test results indicate that WG-treated samples experienced more rapid disintegration in the WD cycle than in the FT cycle; however, a decrease in WG particle size resulted in reduced disintegration effects in both WD and FT conditions. In both the FT and WD cycles, the declining trend exhibited a stable tendency around the eighth cycle. Nevertheless, the WD cycling damage considerably intensified disintegration, causing a profound deterioration in the structural integrity of the samples. As a result, repeated WD cycles lead to the formation of microcracks, which progressively weaken soil aggregation and reduce the overall strength of the samples. Consequently, this green and simple soil improvement technique can provide more inspiration for reducing waste and building material costs through efficient use of construction and demolition waste.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Reinforcement of problematic soils using geotextile encased stone/sand columns10.1007/s12517-022-10561-0 ↗
2. Foundation design on problematic soils with high underground water level10.7764/rdlc.19.3.233-245 ↗
3. Strengthening of Korean residual soil with β-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.030 ↗
4. Soil improvement using waste materials: a review
5. Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer—an environmentally friendly soil stabilizer
6. A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685 ↗
7. Production, characterization and performance of green geopolymer modified with industrial by-products10.1038/s41598-024-55494-8 ↗
8. Evaluating the crushing characteristics of recycled construction and demolition waste for use in road bases10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100543 ↗
9. Performance and prediction of long-term settlement in road embankments constructed with recycled construction and demolition waste10.1007/s11440-022-01473-0 ↗
10. Suitability of recycled construction and demolition aggregates as alternative pipe backfilling materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.005 ↗
11. Laboratory evaluation of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.105 ↗
12. High temperature performance of geopolymers based on construction and demolition waste
13. What a waste: a global review of solid waste management
14. Review on sustainable construction and demolition waste management—challenges and research prospects10.3390/su16083289 ↗
15. Recycling of construction and demolition waste generated by building infrastructure for the production of glassy materials10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.157 ↗
16. Concrete/glass construction and demolition waste (CDW) synergies in ternary eco-cement-paste mineralogy10.3390/ma15134661 ↗
17. Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: a global perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085 ↗
18. Natural additives and biopolymers for raw earth construction stabilization – a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124507 ↗
19. Properties of concrete containing waste glass10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.07.003 ↗
20. Management and recycling of waste glass in concrete products: current situations in Hong Kong10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.10.006 ↗
21. Recycling of unseparated construction and demolition waste (UCDW) through geopolymer technology10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127771 ↗
22. Effect of the particle size range of construction and demolition waste on the fresh and hardened-state properties of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars with total replacement of sand10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.026 ↗
23. Optimizing mechanical performance of geopolymers produced from construction and demolition waste: a comparative study of materials from different origins10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136171 ↗
24. Construction wastes as raw materials for geopolymer binders
25. Effect of synthesis parameters on the quality of construction and demolition wastes (CDW) geopolymers10.1016/j.apt.2014.11.012 ↗
26. Compositional differences in construction and demolition wastes (CDWs) for geopolymer mortars: a comparative study using different precursors and alkaline reagents10.3390/min14040376 ↗
27. Synthesis of geopolymer using alkaline activation of building-related construction and demolition wastes10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138335 ↗
28. On the mechanical damage to tailings sands subjected to dry–wet cycles10.1007/s10064-018-1427-y ↗
29. Influence of freeze-thaw cycles on mechanical properties of a silty sand10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.05.019 ↗
30. Performance assessments of plastering mortars with partial replacement of aggregates with glass waste10.3390/buildings14020507 ↗
31. Concrete with recycled glass as fine aggregates
32. Reuse of ground waste glass as aggregate for mortars10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.009 ↗
33. Combined use of waste concrete and glass as a replacement for mortar raw materials10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.041 ↗
34. Experimental evaluation of alkali-activated and portland cement-based mortars prepared using waste glass powder in replacement of fly ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132124 ↗
35. Preparation of environmental-friendly cementitious material from red mud and waste glass sludge by mechanical activation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135861 ↗
36. Experimental investigation into the potential of recycled concrete and waste glass powders for improving the sustainability and performance of cement mortars properties
37. Demolition waste glass usage in the construction industry10.3390/infrastructures8120182 ↗
38. Stabilization of clay with waste soda lime glass powder10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.705 ↗
39. Assessment of subgrade soil improvement by waste glass powder
40. Effects of waste glass powder on the geotechnical properties of loose subsoils10.28991/cej-03091137 ↗
41. , Use of waste glass powder in improving the properties of expansive clay soils
42. Efficient & effective improvement and stabilization of clay soil with waste materials10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.333 ↗
43. Experimental investigation on mechanical response of soil reinforced by carbon nanotubes and silica dioxide nanoparticles10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134203 ↗
44. Swelling and strength characteristics of sand treated with paper sludge ash-based stabilizer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127849 ↗
45. Performance evaluation of cohesionless soils stabilized using metakaolin-based geopolymer for infrastructure applications
46. Fundamental Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Sand Treated by a PS Ash-Based Improving Material
47. M.O. Djandjieme, K. Hayano, H. Yamauchi, Effects of dry-wet cycles on the mechanical properties of sand treated with paper sludge ash-based stabilizer, in: 9 th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, Greece, 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53243/ICEG2023-139.
48. Strength of a sandy gypseous soil improved with fly ash geopolymer10.37650/ijce.2024.180106 ↗
49. Improving the performance of soil using sustainable geopolymer10.61132/konstruksi.v2i4.498 ↗
50. Experimental investigation of the feasibility of stabilizing inshore silty sand soil using geopolymer based on ceramic waste powder: an approach to upcycling waste material for sustainable construction
51. A. Abdulkareem, T. Ahmed, N. Kwad, Effect of incorporating kaolinite geopolymer on some mechanical properties of subgrade soil, in: 2023: pp. 680–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003299127-89.10.1201/9781003299127-89 ↗
52. The innovative Fiber reinforced geopolymer fly ash-based geopolymer in loose sand stabilization10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44.93-105 ↗
53. Strength of a sandy gypseous soil improved with fly ash geopolymer10.37650/ijce.2024.180106 ↗
54. A.C.D.-18 on S. and ASTM, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1, ASTM international, 2017.
55. Investigating geopolymer mortar incorporating industrial waste using response surface methodology: a sustainable approach for construction materials
56. Durability assessment of mechanochemically activated geopolymer concrete with a low molarity alkali solution
57. Comparative study on geopolymer binders based on two alkaline solutions (NaOH and KOH)
58. Properties of class F fly ash based geopolymer mortar produced with alkaline water10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.031 ↗
59. Sustainable fabrication of lightweight geopolymer foams from silica-fume and zeolite tuffs: utilizing Al as foaming agent for thermal insulation
60. Valorization of high-volume crushed waste glass as fine aggregate in foamed geopolymer
61. Improvement of mechanical strength of low-plasticity clay soil using geopolymer-based materials synthesized from glass powder and copper slag
62. Effect of curing temperature on geopolymerization of metakaolin-based geopolymers10.1016/j.clay.2014.06.024 ↗
63. Effect of curing temperature on mechanical properties of sanitary ware porcelain based geopolymer mortar10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-08-01 ↗
64. Influence of curing temperature and pressure on the mechanical and microstructural development of metakaolin-based geopolymers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135852 ↗
65. D. ASTM, 2166; Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2016).
66. A new framework for identifying cementation level of MICP-treated sands10.1061/9780784481592.005 ↗
67. ASTM-D560, Test methods for freezing and thawing compacted soil cement mixtures, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2016) (2016).
68. ASTM-D559, Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2015) (2015).
69. Mechanical behaviors of hydrogel-impregnated sand10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.141 ↗
70. Variability in unconfined compression strength of pavement materials stabilised with cementitious binders
71. Effect of synthesis parameters on the quality of construction and demolition wastes (CDW) geopolymers10.1016/j.apt.2014.11.012 ↗
72. Properties of inorganic polymer (geopolymer) mortars made of glass cullet10.1007/s10853-011-6107-2 ↗
73. A.S. for T. and Materials.C.D. on S. and ASTM, Standard guide for evaluating effectiveness of admixtures for soil stabilization, ASTM International, 2008.
74. Using of recycled clay brick/fine soil to produce sodium hydroxide alkali activated mortars10.1177/13694332211015742 ↗
75. The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082 ↗
76. Industrial production of fly ash and sand-based geopolymer bricks using different molarity of NaOH solution, and assessment of their mechanical and durability properties
77. A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.031 ↗
78. Preparation and characterisation of fly ash based geopolymer mortars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.012 ↗
79. Experimental investigation of the compressive and tensile strengths of geopolymer mortar: the effect of sand/fly ash (S/FA) ratio10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.030 ↗
80. Performance of eco-friendly polymers for soil stabilization and their resistance to freeze–thaw action10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131133 ↗
81. Compressive strength freeze and thow durability correlation in soil cement design (RESEARCH NOTE)
82. Numerical simulation of wetting-induced collapse in partially saturated granular soils10.1007/s10035-019-0921-7 ↗
83. Full 3D investigation and characterisation of capillary collapse of a loose unsaturated sand using X-ray CT10.1007/s10035-013-0452-6 ↗
84. Effect of overconsolidation ratio on dynamic properties of binary mixtures of silica particles10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.015 ↗
85. Time-dependent variations of compressive strength and small-strain stiffness of sands grouted with microfine cement
86. Geopolymerization process of alkali–metakaolinite characterized by isothermal calorimetry10.1016/j.tca.2009.04.002 ↗
87. Potential utilization of waste glass powder as a precursor material in synthesizing ecofriendly ternary blended geopolymer matrix
88. Waste glass as partial mineral precursor in alkali-activated slag/fly ash system10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.012 ↗
89. Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.044 ↗
90. Elaboration of geopolymer binder from pharmaceutical glass waste and optimization of its synthesis parameters10.1007/s10163-021-01213-8 ↗
91. Effect of particle contact bond on shear modulus10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:8(1216) ↗
92. The effect of ionic contaminants on the early-age properties of alkali-activated fly ash-based cements10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00724-4 ↗
93. Strength, microstructure, efflorescence behavior and environmental impacts of waste glass geopolymers cured at ambient temperature10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119610 ↗
94. Field simulation technique to enhance the mechanical strength and elemental composition of soft clay soil using thermal treatment