Multi-objective optimization-based model calibration of masonry bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-objective optimization-based model calibration can be an intermediate solution between the computationally expensive probabilistic approaches and the single-objective optimization strategies that do not allow uncertainty quantification of the obtained solutions. This work addresses the multi-objective model calibration of two historic stone arch bridges using high-fidelity computational FE models. To implement the methodology, a five-step approach is proposed: experimental characterization through non-destructive testing techniques, non-parametric as-built geometric modeling, macro-finite element modeling, sensitivity analysis, and multi-objective optimization. The preferred solution among the Pareto front solutions is selected based on two different classical criteria, and the set of optimal solutions is further statistically analyzed to assess the validity of the identification process. The results show an average frequency error of 0.97% and 0.70% and an average MAC of 0.97 and 0.96 for each case study, respectively, thus highlighting the adequacy of the proposed methodology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Restoration models for quantifying flood resilience of bridges
2. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–201910.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 ↗
3. L. J. B, C.R.M. Cong Ye, Sin-Chi Kuok, Implementing bridge model updating for operation and maintenance purposes:examination based on UK practitioners’ views, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 〈https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1914115〉.10.1080/15732479.2021.1914115 ↗
4. Mechanical properties of masonry stone samples extracted from Mexican Colonial churches
5. D.V. Oliveira, P.B. Lourenco, C. Maruccio, Numerical analysis of a load test on a masonry arch bridge, in: Proceedings of the Arch’07-5th Int. Conf. Arch Bridg., 2007.
6. A multidisciplinary approach to calibrating advanced numerical simulations of masonry arch bridges10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.043 ↗
7. Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: application to Vilanova bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011 ↗
8. P.B. Lourenço, Computational Strategies for Masonry Structures, Delft Technical University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1996.
9. Recent advances in masonry modelling: micromodelling and homogenisation10.1142/9781848163089_0006 ↗
10. Structural analysis of masonry historical constructions. Classical and advanced approaches10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1 ↗
11. A detailed micro-modelling approach for the structural analysis of masonry assemblages10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.06.003 ↗
12. A detailed micro-model for brick masonry structures based on a diffuse cohesive-frictional interface fracture approach10.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.038 ↗
13. Seismic assessment of a historical masonry arch bridge10.31462/jseam.2018.01095104 ↗
14. S. Huerta, Mechanics of masonry vaults: the equilibrium approach, in: Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Semin. Hist. Constr. Guimarães, Port., no. February, pp. 47–70, 2001. [Online]. Available: 〈c:%5CUsers%5CUsuario%5CDesktop%5CPhD%5CPapers%5CHistoricalConstructions%5CHuertaS.-Mechanicsofmasonryvaults-Theequilibriumapproach.pdf〉.
15. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures10.1080/15583050601176868 ↗
16. Review of validation of the discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) method10.1002/nag.427 ↗
17. J.N. Reddy, Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Education.
18. A review of experimental investigations and assessment methods for masonry arch bridges10.1080/15732479.2015.1136655 ↗
19. Discrete element analysis of gothic masonry vaults for self-weight and horizontal support displacement10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.014 ↗
20. E. Sacco, Micro, multiscale and macro models for masonry structures, in: M. Angelillo (ed.), Mechanics of Masonry Structures, 2014.10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3_6 ↗
21. Residual capacity evaluation of masonry arch bridges by extended finite element method
22. Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis for load-carrying capacity prediction of a railway arch bridge10.1007/s40999-021-00608-w ↗
23. D’Altri · 2020
24. Two approaches for the analysis of masonry structures
25. Improved bridge evaluation through finite element model updating using static and dynamic measurements10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.011 ↗
26. Operational modal analysis and model updating of Riveted steel bridge
27. Review of finite element model updating methods for structural applications10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.041 ↗
28. State-of-the-art review on Bayesian inference in structural system identification and damage assessment10.1177/1369433218811540 ↗
29. S. Kariyawasam, L. Huyse, Providing safety – using probabilistic or deterministic methods, 2012. 〈https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90546〉.10.1115/IPC2012-90546 ↗
30. Stochastic model updating utilizing Bayesian approach and Gaussian process model10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.011 ↗
31. Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001 ↗
32. Sensitivity or Bayesian model updating: a comparison of techniques using the DLR AIRMOD test data10.1007/s00419-017-1233-1 ↗
33. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018 ↗
34. A multi-objective optimization approach for FE model updating based on a selection criterion of the preferred Pareto-optimal solution10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.084 ↗
35. Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.046 ↗
36. Understanding knee points in bicriteria problems and their implications as preferred solution principles10.1080/0305215X.2010.548863 ↗
37. M. Infantes, J. Naranjo-Pérez, A. Sáez, J.F. Jiménez-Alonso, Determining the best Pareto-solution in a multi-objective approach for model updating, in: Proceedings of the IABSE Symp. Guimaraes 2019 Towar. a Resilient Built Environ. Risk Asset Manag. - Rep., no. June 2021, 2019, pp. 523–30. 〈https://doi.org/10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0523〉.10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0523 ↗
38. E. Sevillano, R. Sun, R. Perera, Damage evaluation of structures with uncertain parameters via interval analysis and FE model updating methods, no. June 2016, 2017, pp. 1–22. 〈https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1901〉.10.1002/stc.1901 ↗
39. A novel load-dependent sensor placement method for model updating based on time-dependent reliability optimization considering multi-source uncertainties
40. Multi-objective optimisation of mild steel embossed plate shear connector using artificial neural network-integrated genetic algorithm
41. Multi-objective optimization on mechanical properties of glass-carbon and durian skin fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) hybrid composites using the extreme mixture design response surface methodology
42. A multi-objective optimization approach for supply chain design of alum sludge-derived supplementary cementitious material
43. A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.004 ↗
44. Concurrent multi-scale modelling and updating of long-span bridges using a multi-objective optimisation technique10.1080/15732479.2012.683198 ↗
45. Multi-objective optimization of a composite orthotropic bridge with RSM and NSGA-II algorithm
46. A collaborative machine learning-optimization algorithm to improve the finite element model updating of civil engineering structures
47. Finite element model updating based on eigenvalue and strain energy residuals using multiobjective optimisation technique10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.09.008 ↗
48. A new multi-objective approach to finite element model updating10.1016/j.jsv.2014.01.015 ↗
49. Updating numerical models of masonry arch bridges by operational modal analysis10.1080/15583058.2013.850557 ↗
50. ND testing and establishing models of a multi-span masonry arch bridge
51. Finite-element analysis and vibration testing of a two-span masonry arch bridge10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000060 ↗
52. An integrated approach for the numerical modeling of severely damaged historic structures: application to a masonry bridge
53. Non-destructive means and methods for structural diagnosis of masonry arch bridges10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.021 ↗
54. Structural characterization of a stone arch bridge by experimental tests and numerical model updating10.1080/15583050701241208 ↗
55. Calibration of the numerical model of a stone masonry railway bridge based on experimentally identified modal parameters10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.044 ↗
56. A hybrid macro-modelling strategy with multi-objective calibration for accurate simulation of multi-ring masonry arches and bridges10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106769 ↗
57. S.A. Blanco, M.D. Fuentes, C.N. Ortiz, Pontes históricas de Galicia, 1991.
58. Geometric issues and ultimate load capacity of masonry arch bridges from the northwest Iberian Peninsula10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.006 ↗
59. El trazado de la Vía 18 del Itinerario de Antonino en Galicia
60. Structural analysis of Monforte de Lemos masonry arch bridge considering the influence of the geometry of the arches and fill material on the collapse load estimation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.107 ↗
61. Reliability-based structural assessment of historical masonry arch bridges: the case study of Cernadela bridge
62. Faro Focus 3 D (FARO Technologies Inc., Lake Mary, Florida, USA). 〈https://www.faro.com/〉.
63. FARO ® SCENE Software. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.faro.com/es-MX/Products/Software/SCENE-Software〉.
64. CloudCompare version 2.6.1. user manual. [Online]. Available: 〈http://www.danielgm.net/cc/〉.
65. Structural analysis of the Roman Bibei bridge (Spain) based on GPR data and numerical modelling10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.010 ↗
66. Ancient stone bridge surveying by ground-penetrating radar and numerical modeling methods10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000497 ↗
67. A novel methodology for the structural assessment of stone arches based on geometric data by integration of photogrammetry and ground-penetrating radar10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.004 ↗
68. Brincker · 2015
69. R. Cantieni, Experimental methods used in system identification of civil engineering structures, in: Proceedings of the 1st Int. Oper. Modal Anal. Conf. IOMAC 2005, no. November, 2005.
70. BRÜEL & KJAER and HBK company. 〈https://www.bksv.com/〉.
71. Artemis Modal, Aalborg East Denmark, 1999, [Online]. Available: 〈https://svibs.com/artemis-modal/〉.
72. Operational modal analysis and finite element model updating of ultra-high-performance concrete bridge based on ambient vibration test
73. Model updating of a masonry tower based on operational modal analysis: the role of soil-structure interaction
74. P.A. Rune Brincker, Lingmi Zhang, Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition, in: IMAC 18 Proc. Int. Modal Anal. Conf. (IMAC), San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2000.
75. Integrating geomatic approaches, operational modal analysis, advanced numerical and updating methods to evaluate the current safety conditions of the historical Bôco Bridge10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.084 ↗
76. MATLAB, The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts. [Online]. Available: 〈https://es.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html〉.
77. Autodesk Revit. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.autodesk.es/products/revit/overview?term=1-YEAR&tab=subscription〉.
78. Computational Mechanics department of TNO Building and construction research institute, DIANA FEA BV Documentation, Delft, The Netherlands, 2003. [Online]. Available: 〈https://dianafea.com〉.
79. JCSS, Probabilistic Model Code – Part 1: Basis of Design, 2001. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.jcss-lc.org/jcss-probabilistic-model-code/〉.
80. JCSS, Probabilistic Model Code – Part 2: Load Models, 2001, pp. 1–73.
81. JCSS, Probabilistic Model Code – Part 3: Material Properties, Jcss, 2002, p. 73. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.jcss-lc.org/jcss-probabilistic-model-code/〉.
82. Reliability-based assessment of existing masonry arch railway bridges10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.030 ↗
83. P.B. Lourenço, J.M. Pereira, Seismic Retrofitting Project: Recommendations for Advanced Modeling, 2018. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/recommendations_advanced_modeling.html〉.
84. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code
85. J. Gibbons, C. Subhabrata, M. Dekker, Nonparametric statistical inference, 2003.
86. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
87. D. Kalyanmoy, Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: an introduction, in: Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing, 2011.
88. The modal assurance criterion – twenty years of use and Abuse.pdf