Outdoor test facilities for the experimental performance evaluation of construction materials and systems: The BeTOP case
Source abstract
Abstract
Proposing new materials and systems to improve the performance and energy efficiency of buildings is often followed by performance evaluation to monitor how they perform and contribute. Experimental performance characterization of new and existing building materials and systems is crucial to understanding their behaviour in relation to indoor environmental and conditional changes, in addition to outdoor environmental changes. Full-scale experimental test cell facilities have been at the forefront of experimental performance evaluation in building-related research, as they can provide a realistic representation of buildings, which includes environmental conditions, building structure, and operational characteristics. In this paper, the new test cell facility of BeTOP, located in the city of Toronto, Ontario, is introduced as a full-scale experimental facility with the capability of multiple practical tests simultaneously. This paper describes the characteristics of this test cell, including structure details, testing capabilities, system details, previous testing campaigns, and future testing potential. The design of such a full-scale testing facility is shown to be crucial in a continental climate, such as Toronto, to observe the long-term performance of new systems under variable boundary conditions with cold winters and hot and humid summer seasons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wind and Air Flow Studies · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Energy conservation and renewable technologies for buildings to face the impact of the climate change and minimize the use of cooling10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.022 ↗
2. Outdoor test cells for building envelope experimental characterisation - a literature review10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.012 ↗
3. Experimental set-up for testing active and passive systems for energy savings in buildings – Lessons learnt10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.109 ↗
4. Switching from static to adaptable and dynamic building envelopes: A paradigm shift for the energy efficiency in buildings10.3233/FDE-150039 ↗
5. Simulation-based support for product development of innovative building envelope components10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.008 ↗
6. A photovoltaic forced ventilated façade (PV-FVF) as heat source for a heat pump: Assessing its energetical profit in nZEB buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111979 ↗
7. Double skin façade integrating semi-transparent photovoltaics: Experimental study on forced convection and heat recovery10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115647 ↗
8. Effect of dynamic characteristics of building envelope on thermal-energy performance in winter conditions: In field experiment10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.017 ↗
9. F. Favoino, R.C.G.M. Loonen, M. Doya, F. Goia, C. Bedon, and F. Babich, Building Performance Simulation and Characterisation of Adaptive Facades – Adaptive Facade Network. TU Delft Open for the COST Action 1403 adaptive facade network, 2018.
10. A. Janssens, S. Roels, and L. Vandaele, Full Scale test facilities for evaluation of energy and hygrothermal performance. 2011.
11. Energy savings due to the use of PCM for relocatable lightweight buildings passive heating and cooling in different weather conditions10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.007 ↗
12. “Design and performance of test cells as an energy evaluation model of facades in a mediterranean building area,”10.3390/en10111816 ↗
13. “A new test cell for the evaluation of thermo-physical performance of facades building components,”10.1080/14786451.2013.796943 ↗
14. “Experimental-simulation methodology for estimation of thermal parameters of adaptive facades in mild climate conditions: A water-flow glazing case study,”
15. “Experimental validation of a dynamic numeric model to simulate the thermal behavior of a facade,”
16. “Comparison of model complexities in optimal control tested in a real thermally activated building system,”
17. “Experimental evaluation of a climate façade: Energy efficiency and thermal comfort performance,”10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.010 ↗
18. “Experimental analysis of the energy performance of an ACTive, RESponsive and Solar (ACTRESS) façade module,”10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.044 ↗
19. C. Buxbaum, W. Gallent, S. Paulitsch, and O. Pankratz, “Hygric Performance of Shaded and Unshaded Highly Insulated, Lightweight Low-Sloped Roofs,” Soc. Heat. Refrig. Am. Eng. Inc, Air-Conditioning, 2010.
20. “The ZEB Test Cell Laboratory. A facility for characterization of building envelope systems under real outdoor conditions,”10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.718 ↗
21. “Energy retrofit using vacuum insulation panels: An alternative solution for enhancing the thermal performance of wood-frame walls,”10.1177/1744259113505748 ↗
22. “Case-based instruction for innovation education in engineering and technology,”
23. “A testing facility for the thermal characterization of building envelopes in outdoor operating conditions,”10.1007/978-3-030-19756-8_10 ↗
24. “MATRIX, a multi activity test-room for evaluating the energy performances of ‘building/HVAC’ systems in Mediterranean climate: Experimental set-up and CFD/BPS numerical modeling,”10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.044 ↗
25. “The NEXT.ROOM: Design principles and systems trials of a novel test room aimed at deepening our knowledge on human comfort,”
26. “Development of a Compatible, Low Cost and High Accurate Conservation Remote Sensing Technology for the Hygrothermal Assessment of Historic Walls,”
27. “Design and construction of a new metering hot box for the in situ hygrothermal measurement in dynamic conditions of historic masonries,”10.3390/en13112950 ↗
28. “Design of a new full-scale facility for building envelope test: FACT (FACade Tool),”10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.027 ↗
29. “Design and Development of a Two-storey Guarded Hot Box,”
30. CalTestBed, “Facilities Directory 2020: An Initiative to De-Risk Innovations and Accelerate Commercialization,” 2020.
31. P. Haves, B. Ravache, and M. Yazdanian, “Accuracy of HVAC Load Predictions: Validation of EnergyPlus and DOE-2 using FLEXLAB Measurements,” 2020. doi: 10.20357/B7H88D.10.2172/1619175 ↗
32. “Experimental investigation of latent heat thermal energy storage using PCMs with different melting temperatures for building retrofit,”10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.016 ↗
33. E. and C. C. Canada, “Historical weather data,” 2019. 〈https://toronto.weatherstats.ca〉.
34. “Assessing the impact of climate change on building heating and cooling energy demand in Canada,”
35. “Analysis of the cooling effects of higher alb e do surfaces during heat waves coupling the Weather Research and Forecasting model with building energy models,”
36. Effects of long-term climate change on global building energy expenditures10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.003 ↗
37. “Implications of passive energy efficiency measures on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of high-rise residential building envelopes,”10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111202 ↗
38. “Case studies of outdoor testing and analysis of building components,”10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.043 ↗
39. “Experimental performance evaluation of a climate-responsive ventilated building façade,”10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105233 ↗
40. “Parametric optimization of multifunctional integrated climate-responsive opaque and ventilated façades using CFD simulations,”
41. “Experimental evaluation of the cooling performance of radiant ceiling panels with thermal energy storage,”10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112021 ↗
42. “Design and control of radiant ceiling panels incorporating phase change materials for cooling applications,”10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117736 ↗
43. “Benefits of latent thermal energy storage in the retrofit of Canadian high-rise residential buildings,”10.1007/s12273-018-0436-x ↗