Numerical investigation of jacking method for asymmetric settlement rectification in tilted concrete buildings
Source abstract
Abstract
In the town of Fereshteh, Tabriz, Iran, there is a growing concern regarding the tilting of recently constructed buildings. This uneven settlement issue can be primarily attributed to variations in loose fill material thickness, elevated groundwater levels, and the presence of loose sandy layers intermixed with clayey layers. The challenges posed by these tilted structures are further compounded when dealing with historically significant buildings, making demolition an undesirable and wasteful solution. Therefore, alternative restoration methods must be explored. This study focuses on the application of the jacking technique to rectify the tilt observed in reinforced concrete buildings ranging from four to eight stories in height. To simulate the rectification process, numerical modeling using the finite element method was employed. The strategic placement of jacks was critical, as they applied force until the foundation achieved equal vertical displacement on both sides or until the uneven settlement was reduced to an acceptable level. Ensuring the structural integrity of the building during this rectification process was of paramount importance to prevent cracking or collapse due to the forces exerted by the jacks. The investigation into internal forces within the structural elements revealed an interesting pattern. Elements on the first floor experienced significantly higher internal forces compared to their counterparts on upper floors. Stress concentration was notably observed at the intersection point of the columns and the foundation surface. This highlights the critical importance of positioning the jacks directly beneath the axis of the columns or bearing elements to ensure effective rectification. Based on the results obtained for the studied structures, it becomes evident that employing the jacking method becomes unfeasible when a section of the raft experiences a settlement exceeding 10 cm. This is due to the drastic change in stress distribution conditions within the structural components under such circumstances. However, the jacking method remains a viable and effective solution for settlements below this threshold, rectifying uneven structural settlements without causing harm to the structural elements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Deformation analysis and reinforcement of Jin-gang tower in jacking method10.1108/WJE-04-2016-021 ↗
2. Soil areas numerical determination aimed at correction of a building tilt
3. Marchi · 2008
4. Rectification an 11-storey vertically deflected residential building10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.050 ↗
5. Iterative search for optimized configurations of micro-tunneling as a compensation method for rectifying tilted structures based on numerical simulations
6. Underexcavation for leveling buildings in Mexico City: case of the Metropolitan Cathedral and the Sagrario Church10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2001)7:3(61) ↗
7. Leaning tower of Pisa: behavior after stabilization operations
8. Han · 2015
9. Jacking tilted building by automatic multiple grouting
10. Inclined buildings–some reasons and solutions
11. Methods of removing buildings deflection used in Poland
12. Beton Peykar Arian. Co: https://betonpeykar.com/shortcode-projects/.
13. Straightening two tilted buildings using two different techniques
14. Slope topographic impacts on the nonlinear seismic analysis of soil-foundation-structure interaction for similar MRF buildings10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107365 ↗
15. Numerical prediction of undrained cyclic triaxial experiments on saturated Kasai river sand using two constitutive models of liquefaction10.1007/s10064-021-02449-2 ↗
16. Non-linear soil–structure interaction in disconnected piled raft foundations10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.08.014 ↗
17. Iranian National Building Code, 2013. Design Loads for Buildings. Office of national construction codes, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, TEH, IRI.
18. Iranian National Building Code, 2013. Foundation and construction. Office of national construction codes, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, TEH, IRI.
19. Iranian National Building Code, 2013. Design and construction of RC buildings. Office of national construction codes, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, TEH, IRI.
20. Design criteria for reinforced columns under axial load and biaxial bending
21. A full 3-D finite element analysis of tunneling–adjacent structures interaction10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00047-2 ↗
22. Potts · 2001
23. MIDAS IT. Co. Ltd., 2021. Midas GTS NX-computer software. URL: 〈https://globalsupport.midasuser.com/helpdesk/KB/View/32636343-midas-gts-nx-manuals-and-tutorials〉.
24. A direct time-domain FEM-SBFEM-SBPML method for soil-structure interaction analysis using quadtree mesh10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105597 ↗
25. Practical large-deformation finite-element method for 3D geotechnical problems involving free surface deformations10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001648 ↗
26. Influence of size and load-bearing mechanism of piles on seismic performance of buildings considering soil–pile–structure interaction10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869 ↗
27. Three-dimensional seismic nonlinear analysis of topography–structure–soil–structure interaction for buildings near slopes10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002301 ↗
28. Butler, H.D., Hoy, H.E., 1977. The Texas quick load test method for foundation load testing user's manual. FHWA IP-77.8, FHWA Implementation Division, WA, USA.
29. Numerical investigation of rigidity and flexibility parameters effect on superstructure foundation behavior using three-dimensional finite element method
30. Fundamental principles that govern retrofitting of reinforced concrete columns by steel and FRP jacketing10.1260/136943306778812769 ↗