Experimental and comparative investigation on fatigue performance of three typical welded joints of Q370qNH bridge weathering steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The weathering index of welded details, including butt-welded, non-load-carrying T-shaped and cruciform welded joints, fabricated with Q370qNH weathering steel was evaluated, and fatigue tests were conducted on the three types of welded details with a stress ratio of -1 to determine the fatigue modes and fatigue properties. The fatigue S-N curves of three typical welded joints are fitted using the fatigue data and compared with the existing fatigue specifications, such as Eurocode 3, IIW 2007 and China code Standard for Design of Steel Structures GB50017-2017. Total of 215 fatigue data are collected form the existing literature, the difference of fatigue performance between the WS welded joints and that of traditional structural steels was analyzed. Results show that the slope parameter m of S-N curve of Q370qNH butt-welded joint is 5.83, which is quite different from the recommended value of 3. The fitting S-N curves of T-shaped welded joints and cruciform welded joints are in relatively well correlation to the S-N design curves. The fatigue performance of non-load-carrying T-shaped welded joints is significantly better than that of butt-welded joints and load-bearing cruciform welded joints. FRI analysis based on the collected fatigue data of 13 types of metallic materials in this study indicates that the actual fatigue strength of Q370qNH welding details demonstrates a certain fatigue safety margin, especially for the non-load-carrying T-shaped welded joints.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang Y., Zheng K., Zhu J., et al. Research on corrosion and fatigue performance of weathering steel and High-Performance steel for bridges. Construction and Building Materials, 289(18): 123108.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123108 ↗
2. Research on corrosion behavior, mechanical properties and application of weathering steel in bridge
3. Weathering steels: from empirical development to scientific design. A review10.1016/j.corsci.2014.03.006 ↗
4. National review on use and performance of uncoated weathering steel highway bridge10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000580 ↗
5. Fatigue assessment of welded connections in I-Girder composite high-speed railway bridges10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001685 ↗
6. Experimental research and numerical analysis of welding residual stress of butt welded joint of thick steel plate
7. Effects of metallic microstructures on fatigue fracture of Q345 steel10.1007/s42243-019-00347-2 ↗
8. Corrosion-fatigue evaluation of uncoated weathering steel bridges10.3390/app9173461 ↗
9. Research progress and engineering application of long lasting high performance weathering steel bridges
10. Experimental study on fatigue crack behavior of bridge steel WNQ570 base metal and butt weld
11. Fatigue behavior of uncorroded butt welded joints made of bridge weathering steel10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.032 ↗
12. Fatigue behavior of uncorroded non-load-carrying bridge weathering steel Q345qDNH fillet welded joints10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105789 ↗
13. Effect of ultrasonic impact treatment on fatigue performance of butt joint of S355J2W+N weather resistant steel. Welding
14. Fatigue strength of weathering steel
15. Fatigue strength of weathered A588 steel beams10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:6(436) ↗
16. European , 2005. Committee for Standardization (CEN), EN 1993–1-9 Eurocode 3. Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–9: Fatigue, CEN, Brussels, 2005.
17. Hobbacher A. , 2007. Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components. International Institute of Welding, XIII-2151–07/XV-1254–07. Paris, France, May 2007.
18. ASTM , 2015. International. Standard Guide for Estimating the Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance of Low-Alloy Steels: ASTM G101–04,2020. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2015.
19. American , 2012. Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASTO LRFD bridge design specifications (6TH Ed.). Washington, D C, 2012.
20. Experimental study on fatigue performance of high strength steel welded joints10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.023 ↗
21. Standard for design of steel structures: GB 50017–2017. Beijing: China Planning Press,2017. (in Chinese).
22. AISC, 2010. Specification for structural steel buildings: ANSI/AISC 360–10. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010.
23. Re-analysis of fatigue data for welded joints using the notch stress approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.001 ↗
24. Experimental research on fatigue performance and fracture mechanism of Q345qD butt welds. Industrial
25. Fatigue performance test study on high strength steel Q460C and its welded connection. Building
26. Assessing the fatigue life of butt-welded joints under oblique loading by using local approaches10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.05.011 ↗
27. HE B L. Effect of ultrasonic impact treatment on fatigue properties of sma490bw weathering steel cross welded joint
28. Comparative analysis of fatigue performance between fully penetrated and partially penetrated cross joints
29. Statnikov E.S., Muktepavel V.O., Blomqvist A., 2012. Comparison of ultrasonic impact treatment (uit) and other fatigue life improvement methods. IIW-1506–00 (ex-doc. XIII-1817–00),2012.
30. Effect of preload and stress ratio on fatigue strength of welded joints improved by ultrasonic impact treatment10.1007/s40194-012-0018-y ↗
31. Pedersen M.M., Mouritsen O.Ø., Hansen M.R., et al., 2010. Comparison of post-weld treatment of high-strength steel welded joints in medium cycle fatigue. Doc. IIW-2077–09 (ex-doc. XIII-2272–09),2010.
32. Effect of loading type on the fatigue strength of asymmetric and symmetric transverse non‐load carrying attachments10.1111/ffe.12531 ↗
33. Trufiakov V.I., Statnikov E.S., Mikheev P.P., et al., 1998. The efficiency of ultrasonic impact treatment for improving the fatigue strength. IIW Doc. XIII-1745–98; 1998.
34. Code for design of highway steel structure bridges: JTG/D64–2015. Beijing: China communications press Co., Ltd, 2015. (in Chinese).