Measurement of traction properties of ceramic tiles and its attention for preventing pedestrian falls
Source abstract
Abstract
Ceramic tiles are generally located in various community and industry venues because of their durability and ability to withstand blemishes, smells, and microorganisms. Thus, they are ideal for bathrooms, kitchens, entryways, laundry rooms, and utility areas. However, they can be extremely slippery in lubricated and even dusty environments. Regardless of the significance of this issue, the care aspects of ceramic tiles’ traction properties should have been systematically studied to avoid slip and fall incidence. The present study evaluates the slip resistance performance of ceramic tiles with different textures and identifies their controls on pedestrian fall prevention. For the ceramic tiles, the three most popular types of surface textures: smooth, moderately rough, and very rough, were chosen. Dynamic friction tests measured traction properties between the ceramic tiles and three shoes in four environments. The measurement results identified that the ceramic tiles exhibited high traction functioning under clean and dry conditions. Whilst the textures of ceramic tiles played a considerable role in soapsuds-covered moderately risky and oil-covered highly hazardous conditions. The current study also proposed a concept of an operational range of surface roughness and identified ideal boundaries of surface textures against diverse levels of slippery circumstances. The outcomes of the present study may be applied to enhance the surface design of ceramic tiles to preclude fall hazards in our community and workplaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Development of a more accurate assessment of roughness parameters for flooring
2. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) · 2022
3. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2022
4. Seasonal variations in incidence of fractures among elderly people10.1136/ip.6.1.16 ↗
5. Outdoor falls among middle-aged and older adults: a neglected public health problem10.2105/AJPH.2005.083055 ↗
6. Slips and falls in a cold climate: underfoot surface, footwear design and worker preferences for preventive measures10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.001 ↗
7. Outdoor pedestrian fall-related injuries among Swedish senior citizens - injuries and preventive strategies10.1111/scs.12153 ↗
8. Kim · 2017
9. Pedestrian falls: a review of the literature and future research directions10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.020 ↗
10. Hospital flooring safety and health: knowledge gaps and suggestions10.1080/10803548.2019.1688473 ↗
11. Kim · 2022
12. Assessment of fatigue resistance of aluminide layers on MAR 247 nickel super alloy with full-field optical strain measurements10.1007/s11665-017-2767-7 ↗
13. Aluminide thermal barrier coating for high temperature performance of MAR 247 nickel based superalloy10.3390/coatings11010048 ↗
14. Additive manufacturing of structural ceramics: a historical perspective10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.155 ↗
15. Adhesion of ceramic tile coating system on concrete block wall
16. Powder rheology and compaction behavior of novel micro-granulates for ceramic tiles10.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.039 ↗
17. Safety assessment of the community facilities for the prevention of pedestrian fall incidents: concrete footpaths and walkways10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001772 ↗
18. Friction measurements on “anti-slip” floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.014 ↗
19. Ceramic floor slipperiness classification – a new approach for assessing slip resistance of ceramic tiles10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.242 ↗
20. Analysis of slip safety risk by portable floor slipperiness tester in state institutions
21. A critical analysis of the relationship between shoe-floor wear and pedestrian/walkway slip resistance
22. Research on slip resistance measurements - a new challenge10.2486/indhealth.46.66 ↗
23. Slip-resistance measurements for assessing pedestrian falls: facts and fallacies
24. Functional levels of floor surface roughness for the prevention of slips and falls: clean-and-dry and soapsuds-covered wet surfaces10.1016/j.apergo.2012.04.010 ↗
25. Investigation of floor surface finishes for optimal slip resistance performance10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.005 ↗
26. Investigation and interpretation of flooring wear developments for pedestrian fall safety assessments10.1080/10402004.2017.1287318 ↗
27. Understanding friction and wear behaviours of smooth resilient surfaces: application for pedestrian fall safety improvements10.1155/2018/3280279 ↗
28. ISO 13006:2018(en) · 2018
29. ISO 17889-1:2021(en) · 2021
30. ASTM International · 2018
31. The surface roughness of a rubber soling material determines the coefficient of friction on water-lubricated surfaces10.1016/S0022-4375(98)00053-X ↗
32. Wear observation of shoe surfaces: application for slip and fall safety assessments10.1080/10402004.2014.980593 ↗
33. Identifying shoe wear mechanisms and associated tribological characteristics: the importance for slip resistance evaluation10.1016/j.wear.2016.04.020 ↗
34. A study on wear development of floor surfaces: impact on pedestrian walkway slip-resistance performance10.1016/j.triboint.2015.11.039 ↗
35. The dynamics of slipping accidents10.1016/0376-6349(81)90009-2 ↗
36. Slip resistance testing of shoes - new development10.1080/00140138308963314 ↗
37. Observation of the floor surface topography changes in pedestrian slip resistance measurements10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00024-X ↗
38. The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness10.1080/00140130110085565 ↗
39. Australian Standards AS/NZS 4663: slip resistance measurements of existing pedestrian surfaces
40. The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00055-7 ↗