Behavior of deformation joints of RC utility tunnels considering multi-hazard conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Utility tunnels have been widely constructed worldwide to accommodate the lifeline infrastructure and ever-expanding municipal needs caused by fast population concentration and urbanization in recent years. Typical reinforced concrete utility tunnels consist of tunnel segments no longer than 30 m in length and deformation joints between adjacent segments. Although extensive research has been carried out on the seismic behavior of utility tunnels using shaking table testing and numerical method, little progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanical behavior of deformation joints under differential settlement and earthquake ground motion. Engineering practice has demonstrated that the deformation joints also play an important role in ensuring the functionability and durability of utility tunnels. In this research program, two groups of eight test models of utility tunnel deformation joints with shear dowel bars were constructed and tested under monotonic and reversed cyclic loading respectively, aiming to simulate the responses of the deformation joints subjected to differential settlement and earthquake excitation. Both ends of each shear dowel bar were inserted into adjacent segments for certain length, where one end is bonded with the segment concrete while the other debonded to allow for potential longitudinal movement due to temperature change. Concrete strength, dowel bar amount, insert length and layout were considered as the test variables. Test results indicated that concrete strength has little influence on the shear capacity of deformation joints. Placing dowel bars only at two vertical sides of the tunnel box-section can improve the deformation capacity and avoid concrete cracking at the bottom slab of the deformation joints. The reversed cyclic loading test results showed great seismic performance of the test models with great load bearing capacity, ductility, energy dissipation and stiffness. Although arranging all dowel bars at side walls can reduce the cracking of bottom slabs, the ductility and energy dissipation capacity are less favorable compared with placing dowel bars all around the box-section. In addition, although 10d is sufficient for the dowel bar insert length, it is suggested that use of 15d can help prevent severe concrete damages. The numerical analysis verified the test results and can be used for further study of the deformation joints of utility tunnels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Seismic damage classification and risk assessment of mountain tunnels with a validation for the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.11.002 ↗
2. A seismic design of underground structures10.1016/0886-7798(87)90011-3 ↗
3. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7 ↗
4. Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis10.1007/s11803-010-0037-x ↗
5. Numerical simulation of shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake excitation10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.023 ↗
6. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint
7. Large scale shaking table model test and analysis on seismic response of utility tunnel in non-homogeneous soil10.1007/s11803-021-2035-6 ↗
8. Three-dimensional nonlinear response of utility tunnels under single and multiple earthquakes10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106607 ↗
9. Numerical study on the behavior of utility tunnel subjected to ground surface explosion10.1016/j.tws.2020.107422 ↗
10. Mechanical behaviors of “easy cracking zones” of precast rectangular utility tunnels
11. Seismic behaviour of tunnels: from experiments to analysis10.1016/j.tust.2020.103334 ↗
12. Shaking table tests of the seismic response of a utility tunnel with a joint connection10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106133 ↗
13. Seismic behaviors of utility tunnel-soil system: with and without joint connections10.1016/j.undsp.2021.08.001 ↗
14. Response characteristics of rectangular tunnels in soft soil subjected to transversal ground shaking10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.003 ↗
15. Strength criterion of recycled aggregate concrete under triaxial compression: model calibration10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126201 ↗
16. Dynamic-response analysis of the branch system of a utility tunnel subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motions in different input mechanisms
17. Comparison between the seismic performance of buried pipes and pipes in a utility tunnel
18. Prefabricated UHPC-concrete-ECC underground utility tunnel reinforced by perforated steel plate: experimental and numerical investigations