journal article·2023-07Open access

Research on the selection of polyurethane adhesive and direct tensile properties of polyurethane rubber particle mixture

Junfeng Gao, Jiakang Chen, Xianwei Meng, Hainian Wang, Ning Xu

Abstract

Poroelastic road surface has been found to be an effective solution for the traffic noise due to their porosity and elastic properties compared with conventional asphalt surface. However, the appropriate polyurethane for road utilization is still unclear and undetermined, the tensile properties of polyurethane rubber particle mixture based on different types of polyurethane adhesive and rubber particles were rarely studied. This study aims to primarily select the road polyurethane adhesive, investigate the stage changes during the tensile test and the interface change after the fracture of polyurethane rubber particle mixture (PRPM). Rubber particles with one size and four different types (F2, F5, T, TA) of polyurethane with five dosages (15%, 18%, 21%, 24%, 27%) were adopted to prepare polyurethane rubber particle mixtures. A bonding and curving equipment based on direct tensile test was developed, while a dog bone shape mold for forming specimens was self-designed. The results showed that the direct tensile change process of polyurethane rubber particle mixture could be divided into four stages: reaction delay stage, elastic deformation stage, fracture stage and post-fracture stage. With the increase of polyurethane content, the damaging effect of the mixture gradually transitioned from the polyurethane-rubber interface adhesion to the polyurethane-polyurethane interface binder cohesion. The polyurethane rubber particle mixture with polyurethane type F2 had high tensile properties at the content of 18%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Analysis on fatigue crack growth laws for crumb rubber modified (CRM) asphalt mixture10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.014 ↗
2. Investigation of the rheological modification mechanism of crumb rubber modified asphalt (CRMA) containing TOR additive10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.031 ↗
3. High-temperature rheological behavior and fatigue performance of lignin modified asphalt binder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117063 ↗
4. Use of shredded rubber tire aggregates for roller compacted concrete pavement10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.052 ↗
5. Performance of dry mixed rubber-plastic composite modified asphalt mixture10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004407 ↗
6. Blending efficiency of reclaimed asphalt rubber pavement mixture and its correlation with cracking resistance10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106506 ↗
7. Grafting waste rubber powder and its application in asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121881 ↗
8. Technical, economic, and environmental investigation of the effects of rubber powder additive on asphalt mixtures10.1061/JPEODX.0000142 ↗
9. High-temperature rheological behavior and fatigue performance of lignin modified asphalt binder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117063 ↗
10. Evaluation of the effect of bio-oil on the high-temperature performance of rubber modified asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.064 ↗
11. Characterization of low temperature crack resistance of crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures using semi-circular bending tests10.1520/JTE20150145 ↗
12. The performance of asphalt binder with trichloroethylene: Improving the efficiency of using reclaimed asphalt pavement10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.164 ↗
13. E. Jerzy, S. Ulf, Ś.-Ż. Beata, Tyre/road noise reduction by a poroelastic road surface, Inter-Noise, 2014.
14. Suitability of PoroElastic Road Surface (PERS) for urban roads in cold regions: mechanical and functional performance assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.228 ↗
15. The poroelastic road surfaceeresults of an experiment in Stockholm
16. U. Sandberg, L. Gucbert, Pooelastic road surface (pers): a review of 30 years of R and D work, in: Inter-noise and Noise-con Congress and Conference Proceedings, Inter-noise and Noise-con Congress and Conference Proceedings, 2011, pp. 3014–21.
17. S. Ulf, G. Luc, PERSUADE – A European project for exceptional noise reduction by means of poroelastic road surfaces, inter. noise 2011, Japan, 2011.
18. G. Luc, S. Ulf, PERSUADE Final Teachnical Report, 2016.
19. Traffic open time prediction of fog seal with sand using image processing technology10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.070 ↗
20. Effects of coarse aggregate angularity on the microstructure of asphalt mixture10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.170 ↗
21. Understanding the fundamental material properties of low-noise poroelastic road surfaces10.1080/10298436.2011.608798 ↗
22. N.-A. Nilsson, Possible method of reducing external type noise, in: Proce. of the International Tire Noise Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 1979.
23. Ultra low noise poroelastic road surfaces10.3390/coatings6020018 ↗
24. K. Kazuyuki, Present status of porous elastic rubber surface (PERS) in Japan, in: Proc. of Inter-Noise, Osaka, Japan, 2011.
25. F. Hitoshi, A. Yoshifumi, H. Kouji, Performace of the porous elastic road surface (PERS) as low noise pavement, in: Proc. of the Inter-Noise, Osaka, Japan, 2011.
26. G. Luc, S. Ulf, Development of the ultra low noise poroelastic road surface: the findings of The PERSUADE project, in: Proc. of 23th International Congress on Sound & Vibration, 2016.
27. Effects of material composition on mechanical and acoustic performance of poroelastic road surface (PERS)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.207 ↗
28. Risks related to car fire on innovative poroelastic road surfaces-PERS10.1002/fam.2231 ↗
29. Evaluation of structural performance of poroelastic road surfacing pavement subjected to rolling–truck tire loads10.3141/2591-07 ↗
30. Shear strength between poroelastic road surface and sublayer with different bonding agents10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002216 ↗
31. Performance evaluation of polyurethane/epoxy resin modified asphalt as adhesive layer material for steel-UHPC composite bridge deck pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123364 ↗
32. Laboratory evaluation on comprehensive performance of polyurethane rubber particle mixture10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.044 ↗
33. B.S. Kim, B.K. Kim, Enhancement of hydrolytic stability and adhesion of waterborne polyurethanes, vol. 97(no. 5), 2005, pp. 1961–9.10.1002/app.21984 ↗
34. A solventless castor oil-based PU adhesive for wood and foam substrates10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.07.001 ↗
35. Ultraviolet, water, and thermal aging studies of a waterborne polyurethane elastomer-based high reflectivity coating10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.11.005 ↗
36. N. Akram, K.M. Zia, N. Mumtaz, M. Saeed, M. Usman, S. Rehman, Polyurethane coatings, Polym. Coat., 2020.10.1002/9781119655145.ch7 ↗
37. Use of nonuniform stress-state tests to determine fracture energy of asphalt mixtures accurately10.3141/2181-07 ↗
38. Characterization of the tensile properties of open graded friction course mixtures based on direct and indirect tension tests10.1520/JTE102687 ↗
39. Fracture energy density of interstitial component of asphalt mixtures10.1617/s11527-018-1251-7 ↗
40. J.J. Bikerman, The Science of Adhesive Joints, Academic Press, New York, 1961.
41. Causes of poor adhesion: weak boundary layers10.1021/ie51403a010 ↗