journal article·2024-10-01Open access

Energy Consumption Prediction of Additive Manufactured Tensile Strength Parts Using Artificial Intelligence

Osman Ulkir, Mehmet Said Bayraklılar, Melih Kuncan

Abstract

The manufacturing sector's interest in additive manufacturing (AM) methods is increasing daily. The increase in energy consumption requires optimization of energy consumption in rapid prototyping technology. This study aims to minimize energy consumption with determined production parameters. Four machine learning algorithms are preferred to model the energy consumption of the fused deposition modeling-based 3D printer. The real-time measured test sample data were trained, and the prediction model between the parameters of 3D fabrication and the energy consumption was created. The predicted model was evaluated using five performance criteria. These are mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), R -squared ( R 2 ), and explained variance score (EVS). It has been seen that the Gaussian Process Regression model predicts energy consumption in the AM with high accuracy: R 2 = 0.99, EVS = 0.99, MAE = 0.016, RMSE = 0.022, and MSE = 0.00049.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electric and Energy, Mus Alparslan University, Mus, Turkey.

Department of Civil Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/168781401882288010.1177/1687814018822880 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12689710.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126897 ↗
3. 10.1080/10426914.2020.186619510.1080/10426914.2020.1866195 ↗
4. 10.1089/3dp.2019.011610.1089/3dp.2019.0116 ↗
5. 10.1089/soro.2019.008110.1089/soro.2019.0081 ↗
6. 10.1080/17434440.2020.175677110.1080/17434440.2020.1756771 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.003 ↗
8. 10.1039/D0MH01322F10.1039/D0MH01322F ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.10510.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.105 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.02910.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.029 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
12. Haleem A, , Javaid M. Additive manufacturing applications in industry 4.0: A review. J Ind Integr Manag, 2019; 4:1930001; doi: 10.1142/S2424862219300011
13. 10.3390/jmmp204006410.3390/jmmp2040064 ↗
14. Ulkir O. Conductive additive manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene filaments: Statistical approach to mechanical and electrical behaviors. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2023; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0287
15. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11011010.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110110 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10462-020-09876-910.1007/s10462-020-09876-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.12251510.1016/j.energy.2021.122515 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.05010.1016/j.renene.2020.11.050 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001 ↗
21. 10.1111/jiec.1266410.1111/jiec.12664 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.01310.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013 ↗
23. 10.1080/00207543.2014.93701310.1080/00207543.2014.937013 ↗
24. 10.1504/IJMR.2017.08365110.1504/IJMR.2017.083651 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00512.x10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00512.x ↗
26. 10.1007/s40684-014-0033-010.1007/s40684-014-0033-0 ↗
27. Murphy C Meisel N Simpson TW et al. Predicting part mass required support material and build time via autoencoded voxel patterns. In: 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Elsevier: Austin TX USA; 2018; pp. 1660–1674.
28. 10.1063/1.501710310.1063/1.5017103 ↗
29. 10.1109/TCST.2019.294975710.1109/TCST.2019.2949757 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y ↗
31. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.06810.1016/j.energy.2018.09.068 ↗
32. 10.4316/AECE.2018.0200110.4316/AECE.2018.02001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10594110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941 ↗
34. Hu YH, , Yu SC, , Qi X, et al. An overview of multiple linear regression model and its application. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2019; 53:653–656; doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.06.021
35. Wu D, , Xu J. On the optimal weighted L2 regularization in overparameterized linear regression. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 2020; pp. 1–12.
36. Gupta B, , Rawat A, , Jain A, et al. Analysis of various decision tree algorithms for classification in data mining. Int J Comput Appl, 2017; 163:15–19; doi: 10.5120/ijca2017913660
37. 10.1007/s11356-021-15662-z10.1007/s11356-021-15662-z ↗