journal article·2020-12Open access

Durability and leach-ability evaluation of K-based geopolymer concrete in real environmental conditions

Peiman Azarsa, Rishi Gupta

Abstract

Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) as an alternative to Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) is a cement-less and green construction material which is produced by mixing industrial by-products with an alkaline solution. In this study, PCC and Potassium-based (K-based) GPC synthesized with 50 % fly-ash and 50 % bottom-ash were exposed to the real environmental conditions to evaluate their chemical metals leach-ability and durability over 150 and 240 days of exposure respectively. The mix contained potassium hydroxide concentration of 12 molarity, potassium silicate/potassium hydroxide ratio of 1.47, alkaline solution/ashes (fly-ash and bottom-ash) ratio of 0.54 and total aggregate content of 1800 kg/m3. To develop GPC, two methods of curing (steam curing and dry curing) were used to increase the compressive strength of GPC. According to the result of compression test, the compressive strength of steam-cured GPC increased 3.5 times when temperature elevated from ambient temperature (̴10 °C) to 80 °C. While, an increase in compressive strength of dry-cured GPC samples was 2.3 times. Non-Destructive Tests (NDT)s including Schmidt hammer, ultrasonic pulse velocity and resonant frequency test were employed to measure the relative dynamic modulus of elasticity. In this study, paver block has been selected as an application since to the best of our knowledge, there is no work reported the effect of real environmental conditions on leach-ability and mechanical properties of K-based GPC paver blocks. Two areas were paved with a total of 150 GPC and 210 PCC paver blocks. The results of the NDTs in area 1 show that the average velocity and compressive strength of GPC decreased approximately 11.6 % and 23.4 % respectively. While, the average velocity and compressive strength of PCC decreased about 8.3 % and 8.2 % respectively. In area 2, the average rate of velocity and compressive strength loss of GPC was about 12.03 % and 19.51 % respectively. Whereas, maximum decrease in average velocity and compressive strength of PCC over 240 days of exposure was 5.28 % and 9.65 % respectively. Leach-ability of GPC as another innovative aspect of current study was also measured using HACH strips since the release of heavy metals can be a concern in GPC. The results indicate that due to the heat-treatment of GPC paver blocks, all the parameters including total alkalinity, total hardness, pH, total chlorine, phosphate, copper, ammonia, iron, nitrate and nitrite were within the standard domain and were constant over 150 days of exposure. The relative dynamic modulus of elasticity power function model and exponential function model were established to find a suitable damage predictive model for both types of concrete. It was concluded that due to the higher values of Adj.R2 for both GPC (0.96) and PCC (0.92), the power function relationship compared well with the exponential function.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. Microstructure and strength properties of mortar containing waste ceramic nanoparticles10.1007/s13369-018-3154-x ↗
2. Enhanced performance of green mortar comprising high volume of ceramic waste in aggressive environments10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.024 ↗
3. Enhancing mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.137 ↗
4. Influence of palm oil fuel ash on fresh and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete
5. Geopolymer binder: a veritable alternative to Portland cement
6. Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036 ↗
7. Study of mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012009 ↗
8. The effect of aggressive environments on the properties of a low calcium fly ash based geopolymer and the ordinary Portland cement pastes10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.085 ↗
9. Comparative analysis between properties and microstructures of geopolymeric concrete and portland concrete10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.08.008 ↗
10. Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083 ↗
11. Abualrous · 2017
12. Chemicals in the environment
13. Feasibility studies on compressive strength of Ground coal ash geopolymer mortar10.3311/PPci.7696 ↗
14. Synthesis and characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash based geopolymers–a comparative study10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.012 ↗
15. Fly ash/Kaolin based geopolymer green concretes and their mechanical properties10.1016/j.dib.2015.10.029 ↗
16. Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.023 ↗
17. Concentration of NaOH and the effect on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.568 ↗
18. Alkali-activated slag concrete: fresh and hardened behaviour10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.003 ↗
19. Potassium based geopolymer for passive fire protection of concrete tunnels linings10.1016/j.tust.2014.05.003 ↗
20. Hosan · 2015
21. Reactivity, workability and strength of potassium versus sodium-activated high volume fly ash-based geopolymers
22. Geopolymeric materials prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.031 ↗
23. Utilization of industrial By-products in concrete10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.192 ↗
24. Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.031 ↗
25. Khandol · 2016
26. Long-term leaching of toxic trace metals from Portland cement concrete10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00200-2 ↗
27. Leaching of metals from cement under simulated environmental conditions10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.008 ↗
28. Leaching assessment of concrete made of recycled coarse aggregate: physical and environmental characterisation of aggregates and hardened concrete10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.001 ↗
29. Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: microstructure and metal leaching10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.063 ↗
30. C618/C618M · 2017
31. Physical and mechanical properties of fly ash and slag geopolymer concrete containing different types of micro-encapsulated phase change materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.016 ↗
32. Freeze-thaw resistance of class F fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.166 ↗
33. Preparation of a geopolymer from red mud slurry and class F fly ash and its behavior at elevated temperatures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.034 ↗
34. Comparison of the characteristics of bottom and fly ashes generated from various incineration processes10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.099 ↗
35. Characterization and application of municipal solid waste incineration(MSWI) bottom ash and waste granite powder in alkali activated slag10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.218 ↗
36. Current state of K-based geopolymer cements cured at ambient temperature
37. Prediction of the compressive strength from resonant frequency for low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002228 ↗
38. Belforti · 2017
39. IS 15658 · 2006
40. Cenospheres: a review," a review10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.059 ↗
41. Plerosphere and its role in reduction of emitted fine fly ash particles from pulverized, coal-fired power plants10.1016/j.fuel.2008.08.015 ↗
42. Bridging the gap between research and standards10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.012 ↗
43. Fly ash utilization: a brief review in Indian context
44. Davidovits · 2015
45. Novel approach to microscopic characterization of cryo formation in air voids of concrete10.1016/j.micron.2019.04.004 ↗
46. ASTM C33/C33M · 2015
47. ASTM C192/C192M · 2015
48. Compressive strength conversion factors of concrete as affected by specimen shape and size," research journal of applied sciences
49. Shape-effect in the effective laws of Plain and rubberized concrete
50. EN 206 · 2014
51. ASTM C39/C39M · 2015
52. ASTM C805/805M · 2013
53. ASTM C597/C597M · 2016
54. Relationship between compressive strength and UPV of GGBFS based geopolymer mortars exposed to elevated temperatures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.006 ↗
55. AccuaWeather · 2017
56. ASTM C215/C215M · 2016
57. Study on the factors of affecting the immobilization of heavy metals in fly ash-based geopolymers10.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.019 ↗
58. USEPA · 2016
59. The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.069 ↗
60. Effect of calcium on geopolymerization of aluminosilicate wastes
61. The effect of heat-curing on transport properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.210 ↗
62. An overview on the influence of various factors on the properties of geopolymer concrete derived from industrial by-products10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.065 ↗
63. Specimen shape and size effects on the concrete compressive strength under static and dynamic tests10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.069 ↗
64. Uncertainties of concrete parameters in shear capacity calculation of RC members without shear reinforcement
65. ACI 318 · 2014
66. Permeability and abrasion resistance of geopolymer concrete
67. Monteiro · 2014
68. Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.056 ↗
69. Calculations relating to concrete and masonry
70. Corrosion of steel in concrete structures
71. The role of open and closed curing conditions on The leaching properties of fly ash-slag-based geopolymer10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.075 ↗
72. Kozisek · 2004
73. Synthesis and heavy metal immobilization behaviors of slag based geopolymer10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.033 ↗
74. Workability and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash-slag concrete cured at ambient temperature10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.008 ↗
75. Indian Standard 1331 · 2016
76. Freeze–thaw cycle test and damage mechanics models of alkali-activated slag concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.006 ↗