journal article·2025-07Open access

Machine learning-based estimation of CO2 footprint and environmental-mechanical performance of blended cement concrete

Felipe Vargas, Iván La Fé-Perdomo, Jorge A. Ramos-Grez, Ivan Navarrete

Abstract

Blended cements with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are extensively used to mitigate the environmental impact of concrete. However, assessing their environmental performance often requires detailed data and time-intensive analyses. This study presents a machine learning-based methodology for the rapid estimation of the CO₂ footprint and environmental-mechanical performance (CO₂/MPa ratio) of concrete mixtures using only the proportions of their main components (i.e., ordinary portland cement (OPC), SCMs, aggregates, water, and water-reducing admixtures). The models were developed using a dataset of 246 mixtures compiled from the literature and validated against 15 experimentally tested mixtures. The results demonstrate that the Gaussian Process Regressor provides the highest predictive accuracy for both CO₂ footprint and CO₂/MPa ratio. Feature analysis revealed that OPC content has the highest impact on the CO₂ footprint, while aggregate fraction has the most significant influence on the CO₂/MPa ratio. An optimization framework was also implemented to explore the trade-offs among mix components, showing that increasing SCM content does not always lead to improved CO₂/MPa ratio, highlighting the need for balanced mixture design. The developed models offer a practical tool for supporting early-stage decision-making in construction projects by enabling rapid sustainability assessments of concrete mixtures, independent of specific SCM types , production methods, or geographical context.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning-based mix design tools to minimize carbon footprint and cost of UHPC. Part 2: cost and eco-efficiency density diagrams
2. Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928-201810.5194/essd-11-1675-2019 ↗
3. Achieving net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – a multidimensional analysis of residential building systems
4. ACI Committee 323, Low-Carbon Concrete: Code Requirements and Commentary, 2024.
5. United Nations Environment Programme, Yale Center for Ecosystems + Arquitecture, Building Materials and the Climate: Constructing a New Future, 2023.
6. World Green Building Council, Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon, 2019.
7. Research review of cement clinker chemistry10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.018 ↗
8. Novel modifications in a conventional clinker making process for sustainable cement production10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.259 ↗
9. Comparison of the electrochemical decarbonation of different-grade limestones used in cement manufacturing10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107307 ↗
10. Comparative LCA of recycled and natural aggregate concrete using Particle Packing Method and conventional method of design mix10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.328 ↗
11. Effects of fines content on packing density of fine aggregate in concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.022 ↗
12. Supplementary cementitious materials to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from concrete: can there be too much of a good thing?10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.008 ↗
13. Effective carbon emission reductions from using upgraded fly ash in the cement industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.136 ↗
14. Supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 ↗
15. F. Rivera, P. Martínez, J. Castro, M. López, Massive volume fly-ash concrete: A more sustainable material with fly ash replacing cement and aggregates, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.08.001.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.08.001 ↗
16. Composition of C-S-H in pastes with increasing levels of silica fume addition10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.04.016 ↗
17. Comparing the pozzolanic activity properties of obsidian to those of fly ash and blast furnace slag10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.185 ↗
18. Characterization and quantification of the pozzolanic reactivity of natural and non-conventional pozzolans10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104708 ↗
19. The study of using rice husk ash to produce ultra high performance concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.046 ↗
20. Use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the production of cement and concrete - a review10.1504/IJGENVI.2012.049382 ↗
21. Pre-treatment of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash for utilisation in cement mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.185 ↗
22. Development of a new supplementary cementitious material from the activation of copper tailings: Mechanical performance and analysis of factors10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.223 ↗
23. Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on viscosity of cement-based pastes10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106635 ↗
24. Influence of metakaolin and silica fume on the heat of hydration and compressive strength development of mortar10.1016/j.clay.2011.06.008 ↗
25. Design and performance of ternary blend high-volume fly ash concretes of moderate slump10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.082 ↗
26. Evaluation of environmental impact distribution methods for supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.048 ↗
27. Comparative sustainability assessment of binary blended concretes using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and ordinary portland cement (OPC)10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.010 ↗
28. Environmental impacts evaluation of treated copper tailings as supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104890 ↗
29. Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: a critical review10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005 ↗
30. Application of machine learning initiatives and intelligent perspectives for CO2 emissions reduction in construction10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135504 ↗
31. Predictive models for concrete properties using machine learning and deep learning approaches: a review
32. Enhancing property prediction and process optimization in building materials through machine learning: a review10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112031 ↗
33. Compressive strength prediction of metakaolin based high-performance concrete with machine learning10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.522 ↗
34. Prediction of concrete porosity using machine learning10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100794 ↗
35. Predicting the evolution of static yield stress with time of blended cement paste through a machine learning approach10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130632 ↗
36. Prediction of concrete and FRC properties at high temperature using machine and deep learning: A review of recent advances and future perspectives
37. Mapping the strength of agro-ecological lightweight concrete containing oil palm by-product using artificial intelligence techniques10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.108 ↗
38. Structural damage identification using ensemble deep convolutional neural network models
39. Developing bearing capacity model for geogrid-reinforced stone columns improved soft clay utilizing MARS-EBS hybrid method10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100906 ↗
40. Modeling of surface roughness in electro-discharge machining using artificial neural networks
41. Prediction of surface treatment effects on the tribological performance of tool steels using artificial neural networks10.3390/app9142788 ↗
42. Heuristic algorithm-based semi-empirical formulas for estimating the compressive strength of the normal and high performance concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124467 ↗
43. Designing sustainable concrete mixture by developing a new machine learning technique10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120578 ↗
44. Green concrete containing diatomaceous earth and limestone: Workability, mechanical properties, and life-cycle assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.077 ↗
45. Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.035 ↗
46. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an alkali-activated binary concrete based on natural volcanic pozzolan: A comparative analysis to OPC concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.017 ↗
47. Mechanical, environmental and economic performance of structural concrete containing silica fume and marble industry waste powder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.192 ↗
48. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of self-consolidating concrete mixtures made with blended portland cements containing fly ash and limestone powder10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.003 ↗
49. Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on reduction of CO2 emissions from concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.018 ↗
50. Quality and durability properties and life-cycle assessment of high volume biomass fly ash mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.173 ↗
51. Comparative environmental life-cycle analysis of concretes using biomass and coal fly ashes as partial cement replacement material10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.124 ↗
52. Environmental evaluation of concrete with sewage sludge ash based on LCA
53. A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.029 ↗
54. Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.004 ↗
55. Life cycle assessment of completely recyclable concrete10.3390/ma7086010 ↗
56. The greenhouse gas implications of using ground granulated blast furnace slag as a cement substitute10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.082 ↗
57. Environmental evaluation of treated tailing as supplementary cementitious material10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.008 ↗
58. Design and properties of sustainable concrete10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.189 ↗
59. Comparative LCA of concrete with recycled aggregates: a circular economy mindset in Europe10.1007/s11367-020-01798-6 ↗
60. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials: cut-off vs. substitution10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121465 ↗
61. Effect of compressive strength and chloride diffusion on life cycle CO 2 assessment of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.335 ↗
62. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental sustainability of cementitious materials for 3D concrete printing: a systematic literature review
63. Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: a critical review10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005 ↗
64. XGBoost
65. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
66. Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning
67. Interpret Gaussian process models by using integrated gradients10.1002/minf.202400051 ↗
68. Enhanced Gaussian Process Model for predicting compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)10.3390/ma17246140 ↗
69. Socio-economic correlation analysis and hybrid artificial neural network model development for provincial waste electrical and electronic equipment generation forecasting in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138076 ↗
70. Research trends, themes, and insights on artificial neural networks for smart cities towards SDG-1110.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137300 ↗
71. Influence of coal ashes on fired clay brick quality: random forest regression and artificial neural networks modeling10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137153 ↗
72. A random forest-based model for the prediction of construction-stage carbon emissions at the early design stage10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129657 ↗
73. GIS-assisted modeling of wind farm site selection based on support vector regression10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135993 ↗
74. Combining rough set theory and support vector regression to the sustainable form design of hybrid electric vehicle10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127137 ↗
75. Improving short-term wind power prediction using hybrid improved cuckoo search arithmetic - support vector regression machine10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123739 ↗
76. Modelling the removal efficiency of hydrogen sulfide from biogas in a biofilter using multiple linear regression and support vector machines10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136965 ↗
77. Comparative analysis and experimental validation of statistical and machine learning-based regressors for modeling the surface roughness and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel specimens produced by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.021 ↗
78. Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization
79. Evaluating ML-based DDoS Detection with Grid Search Hyperparameter Optimization
80. Grid search in hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for prediction of HIV/AIDS test results
81. P. Liashchynskyi, P. Liashchynskyi, Grid Search, Random Search, Genetic Algorithm: A Big Comparison for NAS, 2019. 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06059〉.
82. Prediction of electricity generation from a combined cycle power plant based on a stacking ensemble and its hyperparameter optimization with a grid-search method10.1016/j.energy.2021.120309 ↗
83. Selecting the most important self-assessed features for predicting conversion to mild cognitive impairment with random forest and permutation-based methods10.1038/s41598-020-77296-4 ↗
84. K. Deb, S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, T. Meyarivan, A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: NSGA-II, in: 2000: pp. 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83.10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83 ↗
85. Multi-objective Optimization
86. Environmental impacts evaluation of treated copper tailings as supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104890 ↗
87. Environmental impacts evaluation of treated copper tailings as supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104890 ↗
88. Ecological, fresh state and long-term mechanical properties of high-volume fly ash high-performance self-compacting concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.074 ↗
89. Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.004 ↗
90. F. Vargas, I. La Fé-Perdomo, J.A. Ramoz-Grez, I. Navarrete, Replication Data for: The estimation of the CO2 footprint and environmental-mechanical performance of blended cement concrete using a machine learning approach [dataset], 2025. 〈https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/KP6UFA〉).10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04741 ↗
91. Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using ANN models: incorporating porosity, compressional wave velocity, and schmidt hammer data10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107347 ↗
92. Extending SC-PDSI-PM with neural network regression using GLDAS data and permutation feature importance10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105475 ↗
93. New aggregate grading models for low-binder self-consolidating and semi-self-consolidating concrete (Eco-SCC and Eco-semi-SCC)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120314 ↗
94. Optimizing supplementary cementitious material replacement to minimize the environmental impacts of concrete10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105049 ↗