journal article·2025-07Open access

Recycled cross-laminated timber as a low environmental impact alternative to virgin material: Latvia case study

Peteris Vasuks, Ilze Vamza, Megija Valtere, Tereza Bezrucko, Dagnija Blumberga

Abstract

Building with wood has become more popular and so has the circularity concept and carbon storage in products. This study aims to analyse the life cycle impacts of cross-laminated timber (CLT) recycling. Functional unit of 1 m 3 was chosen for the CLT and recycled cross-laminated timber (ReCLT) comparison. For the life cycle assessment, the ReCiPe methodology was used allowing to calculate midpoint and endpoint accumulated impacts of both ReCLT and CLT, therefore allowing for the best comparison. Overall, the ReCLT showed significantly reduced environmental impacts in endpoint categories from 50 % to 80 % reduction in the single score evaluation. Although midpoint impacts showed mostly reduced environmental impacts, e.g., global warming, land use and others, the water eutrophication – both marine and freshwater, leading to think for improvements in the recycling process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Sustainable Design and Development · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Cross-laminated timber for building construction: a life-cycle-assessment overview
2. Maria Fernanda Laguarda Mallo and Omar Espinoza, Cross-Laminated Timber Vs. Concrete/Steel: Cost Comparison Using A Case Study, presented at the WCTE2016 World Conference on Timber Engineering, Vienna, Austria, 2017.
3. Emerging technologies for the development of wood products towards extended carbon storage and CO2 capture
4. Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091 ↗
5. Complete circularity in cross-laminated timber production
6. Life cycle assessment as a guide for designing circular business models in the wood panel industry: a critical review10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131729 ↗
7. Life cycle assessment of reprocessed cross laminated timber in Latvia
8. Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5 ↗
9. Recycling and End-of-Life Scenarios for Timber Structures
10. Making LCA results count, PRé Sustainability. (Accessed: Nov. 25, 2024)Available: https://pre-sustainability.com/articles/consider-your-audience-when-doing-lca/.
11. Ranganathan · Greenh. Gas. Protoc.: A Corp. Account. Report. Stand. · 2004
12. 2006 Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework, 14040, Geneva, Switzerland., 2006. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html〉.
13. Environmental response of a CLT floor panel: lessons for moisture management and monitoring of mass timber buildings10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.038 ↗
14. Cross laminated timber (CLT) as an alternative form of construction wood10.5552/drind.2017.1728 ↗
15. Stora Enso, 2021KVH ® structural timber, EPD S-P-02153,Available: 〈https://www.storaenso.com/-/media/documents/download-center/certificates/wood-products-approvals-and-certificates/epd/stora-enso-epd-kvh-2021.pdf〉.
16. Timberlink Australia Pty Ltd, Cross laminated timber (CLT) glue laminated timber (GLT), EPD EPD-IES-0007432:002 (S-P-07432), 2019. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.environdec.com/library/epd7432〉.
17. Financiera Maderera S.A., CLT (Cross Laminated Timber), EPD EPD-IES-0010735:002 (S-P-10735), 2019. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.environdec.com/library/epd10735〉.