journal article·2024-07Open access

Comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption and carbon emissions of asphalt pavement recycling technology

Decai Wang, Lan Yang, Qunlei Zhang, Yuanxun Zheng, Lei Hu, Kai Cheng, Jiawei Wei

Abstract

To assess the energy saving and emission reduction effects of recycling technology, the quantitative analysis of energy consumption and carbon emission of recycled asphalt pavement is conducted of asphalt mixture production, transportation, paving and compaction. Firstly, the calculation model for energy consumption and carbon emissions of recycled asphalt pavement is established during the construction stage. In addition, the energy consumption and carbon emission of four recycling technologies, including the HCPR, HIR, CCPR and CIR, were compared. Finally, the FCE method is used to evaluate the actual effect of energy saving and emission reduction from the perspectives of the ecological benefit and the economic benefit. The research results indicate the most serious stage of energy consumption is the new material production stage, and the most serious stage of carbon emission is the asphalt mixture production stage of recycled asphalt pavement. Taking the HCPR technology as an example are calculated in detail. The energy consumption of the HCPR technology in the four stages of the construction stage was 17.59 MJ, 344.45 MJ, 228.51 MJ and 25.85 MJ, respectively, and the emissions in the four stages of the construction stage were 1307.89 g, 5971.28 g, 19251.24 g and 1949.82 g, respectively. For different recycling technologies in the construction stage, the energy-saving ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 13.62%, 9.61% and 19.24% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, which have a certain energy-saving effect. However, the energy consumption of CIR reduced by 43.63%, which the energy saving effect is most significant. Moreover, the emission reduction ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 2.3%, 9.23% and 1.01% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, the emission of CIR reduced by 30.76%, so the emission reduction effect of CIR is most significant. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation score of the CIR technology with the most significant energy saving and emission reduction effect is 0.8021 in terms of ' ecological benefits ' and 0.8074 in terms of ' economic benefits '. In summary, it is recommended to adopt CIR technology in the engineering project, which can achieve the most significant energy-saving and emission reduction effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Review of very high-content reclaimed asphalt use in plant-produced pavements: state of the art.10.1080/10298436.2014.893331 ↗
2. I.L. Al-Qadi, Q. Aurangzeb, S.H. Carpenter, W.J. Pine, J. Trepanier, 2012, Impact of High RAP Contents on Structural and Performance Properties of Asphalt Mixtures, 2012, 0197-9191.
3. Performance evaluation of temperature effect on hot in-place recycling asphalt mixtures10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124093 ↗
4. Quantifying the effective mobilized RAP content during hot in-place recycling techniques10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127953 ↗
5. Influence of mobilized RAP content on the effective binder quality and performance of 100% hot in-place recycled asphalt mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127941 ↗
6. Study on carbon emission of epoxy recycled pavement based on whole life cycle
7. Analysis of carbon emission during HIR asphalt pavement construction
8. Blending efficiency improvement and energy investigation of recycled asphalt mixture involved warm mix technology
9. N. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. Bai, , 2022, Road life-cycle carbon dioxide emissions and emission reduction technologies: A review [J]. 2022, 9(4):24..10.1016/j.jtte.2022.06.001 ↗
10. Environmental and economic analyses of recycled asphalt concrete mixtures based on material production and potential performance10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.014 ↗
11. Sustainable pavements: environmental, economic, and social benefits of in situ pavement recycling10.3141/2084-11 ↗
12. Analysis of geothermal recycling economy on the over-haul project of Hainan East Line Expressway
13. Environmental benefit analysis of hot central plant recycling asphalt pavement based on LCA
14. Comparative assessments for environmental impacts from three advanced asphalt pavement construction cases10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126659 ↗
15. Hybrid life cycle assessment for asphalt mixtures with high RAP content10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.004 ↗
16. Maximizing the application of RAP in asphalt concrete pavements and its long-term performance: a review10.3390/polym14214736 ↗
17. Life cycle assessment of asphalt pavement recycling for greenhouse gas emission with temporal aspect10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.207 ↗
18. Life cycle assessment applied to bituminous mixtures containing recycled materials: crumb rubber and reclaimed asphalt pavement10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.015 ↗
19. A comparative environmental impact analysis of asphalt mixtures containing crumb rubber and reclaimed asphalt pavement using life cycle assessment10.1080/10298436.2019.1623404 ↗
20. Life cycle assessment of low temperature asphalt mixtures for road pavement surfaces: a comparative analysis10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.012 ↗
21. Response surface methodology-based modelling and optimization of sustainable UHPC containing ultrafine fly ash and metakaolin10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131696 ↗
22. Quantitative study on the life-cycle carbon emissions of a nearly zero energy building in the severe cold zones of China10.3390/su14031448 ↗
23. Environmental and economic analyses of recycled asphalt concrete mixtures based on material production and potential performance10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.014 ↗
24. MOC of PRC, 2018. Highway project budget Quota (JTG/T 3832-2018). Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China.
25. MOC of PRC, 2018. Highway project Machinery Cost Quota (JTG/T 3833-2018). Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China.
26. Yang B. Research on Quantitative Analysis Method and Evaluation System for Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of Asphalt Pavement [D]. Chang’ an University, 2012.
27. Decision support for selecting optimal method of recycling waste tire rubber into wax-based warm mix asphalt based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
28. Laboratory investigation for the bridge deck pavement performance of conventional asphalt mixtures based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
29. Laboratory investigation for the bridge deck pavement performance of conventional asphalt mixtures based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
30. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to select the optimal mineral filler for optimization of the performance of asphalt mastics10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123847 ↗