Explicable AI-based modeling for the compressive strength of metakaolin-derived geopolymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Geopolymers (GPs) are produced using a variety of alumina and silica-rich ingredients, including natural sources, such as calcined clays, as well as waste by-products, like fly ash and slag. It is difficult to measure the effect of each parameter on the strength of GP composites via experimental research. In this regard, this research aimed to build artificial intelligence (AI)-aided estimation models to quantify the impact of mix proportions on the compressive strength (CS) of MK-based GP mortar. Gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools were used for models' development due to their advantage of yielding model equations for future predictions. Hyperparameters in GEP and MEP were systematically adjusted to enhance the models' optimal predictability. The regression and error analysis proved the superiority of MEP models over GEP models. In comparison to the GEP model, which had R 2 , MAE, MSE, RMSE, and objective function values of 0.90, 4.02, 25.3, 5.03, and 0.08, respectively, the MEP model demonstrated greater accuracy with values of 0.96, 3.24, 16.4, 4.05, and 0.02 respectively. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to determine the effect of various parameters on the CS of MK-based GP mortar. The established models' equations may be exploited to assess the CS of MK-based GP composites with various input parameters, hence reducing the need for further laboratory testing. Implementing this approach not only improves the efficiency of material design but also encourages the sustainable utilization of locally accessible resources in the manufacturing of geopolymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. The dependence of thermophysical and hygroscopic properties of macro-porous geopolymers on Si/Al10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121432 ↗
2. Geopolymer concrete as green building materials: recent applications, sustainable development and circular economy potentials10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155577 ↗
3. Influence of waste glass powder on the physico-mechanical properties and microstructures of fly ash-based geopolymer paste after exposure to high temperatures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120579 ↗
4. Acid resistance of metakaolin-based, bamboo fiber geopolymer composites10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124194 ↗
5. Performance of FA-based geopolymer concretes exposed to acetic and sulfuric acids10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119503 ↗
6. A comprehensive overview of geopolymer composites: a bibliometric analysis and literature review
7. Characterization and mechanical performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer for sustainable building applications10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121938 ↗
8. Influence of alkali activator type and proportion on strength performance of calcined clay geopolymer mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120446 ↗
9. Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.046 ↗
10. Physical & mechanical properties of fiber reinforced metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118965 ↗
11. Reexamining calcination of kaolinite for the synthesis of metakaolin geopolymers-roles of dehydroxylation and recrystallization10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.024 ↗
12. Influence of critical parameters of mix proportions on properties of MK-based geopolymer concrete10.1007/s13369-020-04970-0 ↗
13. Formulation and performance of flash metakaolin geopolymer concretes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.061 ↗
14. Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.023 ↗
15. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060 ↗
16. E. Kim, Understanding effects of silicon/aluminum ratio and calcium hydroxide on chemical composition, nanostructure and compressive strength for metakaolin geopolymers, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012.
17. Effect of curing temperature on geopolymerization of metakaolin-based geopolymers10.1016/j.clay.2014.06.024 ↗
18. Effect of metakaolin replaced granulated blast furnace slag on fresh and early strength properties of geopolymer mortar10.1016/j.asej.2016.11.011 ↗
19. A scientometric analysis approach to analyze the present research on recycled aggregate concrete
20. Reviewing the behaviour of high volume fly ash based self compacting concrete
21. Nonlinear finite element analysis of steel fibre-reinforced concrete beam under static loading
22. Different testing methods for assessing the synthetic fiber distribution in cement-based composites10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.207 ↗
23. Modeling compressive strength of EPS lightweight concrete using regression, neural network and ANFIS10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.016 ↗
24. Advanced machine learning modeling approach for prediction of compressive strength of FRP confined concrete using multiphysics genetic expression programming10.3390/polym14091789 ↗
25. Forecasting the mechanical properties of plastic concrete employing experimental data using machine learning algorithms: DT, MLPNN, SVM, and RF10.3390/polym14081583 ↗
26. Modeling of mechanical properties of silica fume-based green concrete using machine learning techniques10.3390/polym14010030 ↗
27. Comparative study of experimental and modeling of fly ash-based concrete10.3390/ma15113762 ↗
28. Predictive modeling of mechanical properties of silica fume-based green concrete using artificial intelligence approaches: MLPNN, ANFIS, and GEP10.3390/ma14247531 ↗
29. Analyzing the mechanical performance of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with different machine learning techniques10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125785 ↗
30. Application of back propagation neural network to the modeling of slump and compressive strength of composite geopolymers10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111241 ↗
31. Application of machine learning approaches to predict the strength property of geopolymer concrete10.3390/ma15072400 ↗
32. Modelling of compressive strength of geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete by optimized support vector machine10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.037 ↗
33. The use of machine learning techniques to investigate the properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141305 ↗
34. Gene Expression Programming
35. An evolutionary approach for modeling of shear strength of RC deep beams10.1617/s11527-013-0039-z ↗
36. Novel approach to strength modeling of concrete under triaxial compression10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000494 ↗
37. Genetic programming approach for prediction of compressive strength of concretes containing rice husk ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.011 ↗
38. An evolutionary machine learning-based model to estimate the rheological parameters of fresh concrete
39. Optimizing compressive strength prediction models for rice husk ash concrete with evolutionary machine intelligence techniques
40. High performance prediction of soil compaction parameters using multi expression programming10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105758 ↗
41. A comparison of several linear genetic programming techniques10.25088/ComplexSystems.14.4.285 ↗
42. A hybrid model for supplier selection: integration of AHP and multi expression programming (MEP)10.1007/s00521-015-2078-6 ↗
43. Prediction of compression index of fine-grained soils using a gene expression programming model10.3390/infrastructures4020026 ↗
44. Stock market modeling using genetic programming ensembles
45. Multi expression programming
46. Characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete for different mix design parameters10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.104 ↗
47. Physical & mechanical properties of fiber reinforced metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118965 ↗
48. Influence of critical parameters of mix proportions on properties of MK-based geopolymer concrete10.1007/s13369-020-04970-0 ↗
49. Behavior of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete at ambient and elevated temperatures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125910 ↗
50. Durability and service life analysis of metakaolin-based geopolymer concretes with respect to chloride penetration using chloride migration test and corrosion potential
51. Bond performance of GFRP and steel rebars embedded in metakaolin based geopolymer concrete
52. Drying shrinkage and thermal expansion of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete pavement reinforced with biaxial geogrid
53. Behavior evaluation of sustainable high strength geopolymer concrete based on fly ash, metakaolin, and slag
54. Composition, strength and workability of alkali-activated metakaolin based mortars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.017 ↗
55. Effect of carbonation curing on the physical, mechanical, and microstructural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133403 ↗
56. Role of recycled vehicle tires quantity and size on the properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer rubberized concrete10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.103 ↗
57. Influence of alkali activator type and proportion on strength performance of calcined clay geopolymer mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120446 ↗
58. Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and outliers10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.407 ↗
59. Estimating compressive strength of concrete containing rice husk ash using interpretable machine learning-based models
60. Multicollinearity10.1002/wics.84 ↗
61. Application of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in predicting the compressive strength of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced concrete
62. J. Neter, M.H. Kutner, C.J. Nachtsheim, W. Wasserman, Applied linear statistical models, (1996)..
63. Weisberg · 2005
64. Predictive modeling for compressive strength of 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete using machine learning algorithms
65. Statistical analysis of solid waste composition data: arithmetic mean, standard deviation and correlation coefficients10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.036 ↗
66. Statistical parameters of hydrometeorological variables: standard deviation, SNR, skewness and kurtosis
67. The wisdom development scale: translating the conceptual to the concrete10.1353/csd.2006.0002 ↗
68. Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: prevalence, influence and estimation10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1 ↗
69. Effective use of Pearson's product–moment correlation coefficient10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.003 ↗
70. Prediction model for compressive arch action capacity of RC frame structures under column removal scenario using gene expression programming
71. X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling10.1080/14786440009463897 ↗
72. The use of linear regression methods and Pearson’s correlation matrix to identify mechanical–physical–chemical parameters controlling the micro-electrochemical behaviour of machined copper10.1016/j.corsci.2008.07.022 ↗
73. Modelling the yield stress of ternary cement–slag–fly ash pastes based on particle size distribution10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.041 ↗
74. Synthesis parameters and formulation of metakaolin based geopolymer matrix composites for high-temperature applications (1150°C)10.1002/eng2.13002 ↗
75. ASTM C109/C109M-16a, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, 2016.
76. Geopolymer foam concrete: An emerging material for sustainable construction10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081 ↗
77. Machine learning interpretable-prediction models to evaluate the slump and strength of fly ash-based geopolymer10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.180 ↗
78. A data-driven approach to predict the compressive strength of alkali-activated materials and correlation of influencing parameters using shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.207 ↗
79. Multi expression programming: a new approach to formulation of soil classification10.1007/s00366-009-0140-7 ↗
80. Estimation of strength, rheological parameters, and impact of raw constituents of alkali-activated mortar using machine learning and SHapely Additive exPlanations (SHAP)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131014 ↗
81. Prediction of mechanical properties of green concrete incorporating waste foundry sand based on gene expression programming10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121322 ↗
82. Evaluating the strength and impact of raw ingredients of cement mortar incorporating waste glass powder using machine learning and shapley additive explanations (SHAP) methods10.3390/ma15207344 ↗
83. Use of artificial intelligence for predicting parameters of sustainable concrete and raw ingredient effects and interactions10.3390/ma15155207 ↗
84. Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.001 ↗
85. Modeling and prediction of the specific heat capacity of Al2 O3/water nanofluids using hybrid genetic algorithm/support vector regression model10.1016/j.nanoso.2018.12.001 ↗
86. Forecasting the strength of graphene nanoparticles-reinforced cementitious composites using ensemble learning algorithms10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101837 ↗
87. Multigene expression programming based forecasting the hardened properties of sustainable bagasse ash concrete10.3390/ma14195659 ↗
88. Prediction of compressive and splitting tensile strength of concrete with fly ash by using gene expression programming10.1002/suco.202100213 ↗
89. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
90. Effect of size of coarse aggregate on mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete and ordinary concrete
91. Intermittent curing of fly ash geopolymer mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.007 ↗
92. Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: effect of slag and alkali activators10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.290 ↗
93. Predictive modelling of compressive strength of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques
94. A novel waterproof, fast setting and high early strength repair material derived from metakaolin geopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.058 ↗
95. F.A. Memon, f. nuruddin, S. Khan, N. Shafiq, T. Ayub, Effect of Sodium Hydroxide Concentration on Fresh Properties and Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 8 (2013) 44-56. 2013, , 44–56..
96. The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.05.044 ↗
97. Optimization of production parameters of geopolymer mortar and concrete: a comprehensive experimental study10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116770 ↗
98. A comprehensive GEP and MEP analysis of a cement-based concrete containing metakaolin10.1016/j.istruc.2023.04.050 ↗
99. Comparing the efficacy of GEP and MEP algorithms in predicting concrete strength incorporating waste eggshell and waste glass powder
100. Sustainable use of fly-ash: Use of gene-expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) for forecasting the compressive strength geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.asej.2021.03.018 ↗