Marshall and Balanced mix design in determining the asphalt content for hot mix asphalt mixture: A comparative study
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, the disadvantages of Marshall mix design (MMD) approach have mostly been addressed by Balanced Mix Design (BMD) approach. This study aimed to evaluate the two methods in determining the asphalt content (AC) of hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. For this purpose, the six asphalt contents of 3.5 %, 4.0 %, 4.5 %, 5.0 %, 5.5 %, and 6.0 % by mass of the whole HMA mixture are selected to determine the asphalt content (AC) based on the MMD approach. Also, these asphalt contents are used to determine the AC based on BMD approach. The rut depth (RD) and cracking tolerance index (CT index ) are applied as the evaluation indexes in BMD. According to laboratory testing, by applying the BMD approach, the HMA mixture's AC value is 5.3 %, whereas the MMD approach yields 4.7 %. Furthermore, the IDT and CT index values when utilizing the MMD approach were found to be 28 % and 33.4 %, respectively, higher than those of the MMD method. It was concluded that the MMD might not be an appropriate method for designing the HMA mixtures for long-term pavement cracking performance, and these HMA mixtures need to be designed using the BMD method.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. History of hot mix asphalt mixture design in the United States10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:4(279) ↗
2. Prediction models for marshall mix parameters using bio-inspired genetic programming and deep machine learning approaches: A comparative study
3. Comparison of Superpave and Marshall Mix Performance in Alabama10.1177/0361198105192900116 ↗
4. E. Coleri, S. Sreedhar, I.A. Obaid, Development of a Balanced Mix Design Method in Oregon, Oregon. Dept. of Transportation, Research Section, 2020.10.1177/03611981211032222 ↗
5. Development of a coherent framework for balanced mix design and production quality control and quality acceptance10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123020 ↗
6. Balanced design of asphalt mixtures, Minnesota, Dept. of Transportation
7. The effect of mix design method on performance of asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycling agents: Superpave versus balanced mix design
8. American Standard. Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Bituminous Mixtures. ASTM D6927 – 06, 2006..
9. Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Wheel tracking. BS EN 12697–22:2003..
10. Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test at Intermediate Temperature, ASTM D8225–19, 2019.
11. Microscopy-based approach for measuring asphalt film thickness and its impact on hot-mix asphalt performance
12. F. Yin, and R. West, Balanced Mix Design Resource Guide, National Center for Asphalt Technology, NAPA, 2021.
13. laboratory evaluation of factors affecting rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures using wheel tracking test