On the behavior of an innovative four-layer semi-supported steel plate shear wall
Source abstract
Abstract
Observations of past earthquakes as well as numerical and experimental studies have confirmed the acceptable performance of Steel Plate Shear Walls (SPSW). Although the SPSW has a number of advantages, it has two major flaws: low elastic-buckling capacity of the infill plate and significant stresses generated by the infill plate on the boundary columns. There are some techniques to overcome these shortcomings. Among them, using the semi-supported SPSW is the most effective one. However, the weak point of this system is the reduction of stiffness and strength of the system in comparison with the conventional SPSW. To resolve this issue, an innovative four-layer semi-supported SPSW has been introduced recently. The system is composed up of the main frame, secondary columns, two corrugated infill plates, and two flat infill plates. Since there is no connection between the infill plates and the mainframe, there is no stress transmission from plates to columns. This fact, in turn, reduces the ductility demand. As a result of the combination of the corrugated and flat plates, the buckling capacity of the wall increases nearly up to the yielding point. This results in a more cost-effective system. The current study presents the results of a comprehensive numerical study to investigate the effect of plate thickness, wall length, and aspect ratio on the behavior of this system under the monotonic lateral load. To obtain the pushover curves, the finite element (FE) software package ABAQUS was utilized. The findings showed that, as the aspect ratio of the wall increases, the wall capacity increases and exceeds the capacity of the frame. Furthermore, the relevant equations for achieving the pushover curve were proposed without the need for FE simulation. Finally, the results showed a good match between the FE results and the intended relations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Astaneh-Asl, A. (2001). Seismic behavior and design of steel shear walls. Moraga, CA: Structural Steel Educational Council.
2. Development of a high-performance steel plate shear wall system
3. Analysis of coupled steel plate shear walls with outrigger system for tall buildings10.1007/s40996-019-00246-2 ↗
4. Lateral resistance capacity of stiffened steel plate shear walls10.1016/j.tws.2013.01.014 ↗
5. Theoretical and numerical study on the strengthened steel plate shear walls By Frp laminates10.5829/idosi.ije.2012.25.01c.04 ↗
6. Experimental study on the cyclic behavior of perforated CFRP strengthened steel shear walls10.1016/j.acme.2016.01.009 ↗
7. Experimental seismic behavior of innovative composite shear walls10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.015 ↗
8. Cyclic behavior of traditional and innovative composite shear walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(271) ↗
9. Effect of fiber angle on LYP steel shear walls behavior10.1007/s11771-014-2000-x ↗
10. Shaking-table test of a novel buckling-restrained multi-stiffened low-yield-point steel plate shear wall10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.02.009 ↗
11. Shear resistance and post-buckling behavior of corrugated panels in steel plate shear walls10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.039 ↗
12. Experimental study of hysteretic behavior of semi-rigid frame with a corrugated plate10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106289 ↗
13. Simplified inelastic global buckling theory of non-buckling corrugated steel shear walls for seismic energy dissipation10.1016/j.tws.2020.107209 ↗
14. Seismic behavior of semi-supported steel shear walls10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.02.014 ↗
15. Behavior of steel plate shear walls with different types of partially-encased H-section columns10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106123 ↗
16. Experimental study of cross stiffened steel plate shear wall with semi-rigid connected frame10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.009 ↗
17. Behavior of steel plate shear wall connected to frame beams only10.1007/s13296-011-4006-7 ↗
18. Qian, X., & Astaneh-Asl, A. (2016). Introducing a new ductile and economical steel moment connection. In 2016 SEAOC Convention, October 12 (Vol. 15).
19. Shear resistance and design of infill panels in corrugated-plate shear walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003162 ↗
20. Introducing an efficient compound section for steel shear wall using flat and corrugated plates10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.027 ↗
21. Investigating the behavior of semi-supported steel plate shear walls compounded of two flat and two corrugated plates: a numerical and parametrical study10.1007/s40999-022-00726-z ↗
22. Shear resistance of stiffened steel corrugated shear walls10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.036 ↗
23. Experimental studies on cyclic behavior of corrugated steel plate shear walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002165 ↗
24. Timoshenko · 1959
25. Sabelli, R.and Bruneau, M.,2007. Design guide 20: steel plate shear walls. American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago, IL, USA.
26. Experimental investigation on the behavior of corrugated steel shear wall subjected to the different angle of trapezoidal plate10.1002/tal.1390 ↗
27. ASCE 7–16. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston. Virginia; 2016.
28. Establishing R (or R w) and C d factors for building seismic provisions10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19) ↗