Building a sustainable future: The role of additive manufacturing in civil construction
Source abstract
Abstract
With the advent of Industry 4.0, 3D printing is emerging as a revolutionary technology in various industrial sectors. The ability to gradually deposit material allows the creation of complex shapes without waste and the need for molds. This, coupled with cost reduction, opens up significant opportunities in the construction sector. To minimize waste on the construction site, optimize construction time, and positively contribute to the environment, this work focuses on developing a system capable of three-dimensional printing of objects composed of a desktop-scale 3D printer prototype. The 3D printer developed in this project is integrated with two other crucial subsystems. The first is responsible for extruding a cementitious composite, while the second performs the homogenization of the mixture during material preparation. The Cartesian robot, essential for 3D printing, was constructed based on mechanical and electrical designs and connected to the pumping subsystem via a 1⁄2-inch diameter hose. To ensure the system's viability, it was essential to define flow and printing speed parameters to ensure the extrudability and constructibility of composite materials. The process included preparing a conventional mortar with mixing ratios of 1:0.33:1.33:0.01 (cement, water, sand, and superplasticizer additive). The pumping subsystem was calibrated through flow tests on the injection pump, resulting in mass flows of 4 and 5 Kg/min. Printing speeds on the Cartesian robot were parameterized at 10, 30, and 50 mm/s. This led to the creation of samples named AE1 – 10, AE1 – 30, AE1 – 50 mm/s (for a flow rate of 5 Kg/min) and AE2 – 30, AE2 – 50 mm/s (for a flow rate of 4 Kg/min), along with AR – 1 and AR – 2 samples, which were collected in the mixer without extrusion. The system's validation involved printing an object with dimensions of 400 ×400 x 80 mm (length x width x height). After printing, the object's measurements were analyzed to assess the cementitious material's extrudability and the constructibility of the layers. Tests were conducted in the fresh and hardened states of the mortar, including measurements of consistency index and tensile and compressive strength. The results demonstrated that replacing traditional methods with 3D printing on the construction site is feasible, reducing waste and decreasing construction time. This directly contributes to a cleaner and more sustainable construction process. 3D printing represents a promising innovation in the construction sector, offering significant advantages in terms of efficiency, waste reduction, and positive environmental impact. This work demonstrates the viability of this technology and its potential to transform the construction industry toward more sustainable and effective practices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · BIM and Construction Integration · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. ABNT NBR 13281, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Argamassa para assentamento e revestimento de paredes e tetos - Requisitos, Rio de Janeiro, 2001.
2. ABNT NBR 16916, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Agregado Miúdo: Determinação da Densidade e da Absorção de Água, Rio de Janeiro, 2021.
3. ABNT NBR 13278, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Argamassa para assentamento e revestimento de paredes e tetos: Determinação da densidade de massa e do teor de ar incorporado, Rio de Janeiro - BR, 2005.
4. ABNT NBR 13276, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Argamassa para assentamento e revestimento de paredes e tetos: Determinação do índice de consistência, Rio de Janeiro, 2016.
5. ABNT NBR 5410, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Instalações elétricas de baixa tensão, Rio de Janeiro, 2004.
6. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268 ↗
7. Effect of the printing method and mortar’s workability on pull-out strength of 3D printed elements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117002 ↗
8. Metal 3D printing in construction: a review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045 ↗
9. Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: How can urban planning contribute?10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483 ↗
10. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006 ↗
11. Relationships between lean and sustainable construction: positive impacts of lean practices over sustainability during construction phase10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.216 ↗
12. Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034 ↗
13. Investigation of additive incorporation on rheological, microstructural and mechanical properties of 3D printable alkali-activated materials10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109574 ↗
14. Effect of natural and calcined halloysite clay minerals as low-cost additives on the performance of 3D-printed alkali-activated materials10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111183 ↗
15. 3D printable lightweight cementitious composites with incorporated waste glass aggregates and expanded microspheres – rheological, thermal and mechanical properties
16. Stability of steel slag as fine aggregate and its application in 3D printing materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123938 ↗
17. Mechanical behavior of 3D printed mortar with recycled sand at early ages10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118654 ↗
18. A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks
19. 3D printing for construction based on a complex wall of polymer-foam and concrete
20. Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.005 ↗
21. Recent advances on 3D printing graphene-based composites10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.03.003 ↗
22. 3D Printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction?10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357 ↗
23. M.M. Hoque, M.M.H. Jony, M.M. Hasan, M.H. KabirDesign and Implementation of an FDM Based 3D Printer 5th International Conference on Computer, Communication, Chemical, Materials and Electronic Engineering, IC4ME2 , 10.1109/IC4ME247184.2019.9036538.2019.
24. An integrated BIM-LEED application to automate sustainable design assessment framework at the conceptual stage of building projects10.1016/j.scs.2019.101979 ↗
25. Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015 ↗
26. Use of calcium sulfoaluminate cements for setting control of 3D-printing mortars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.109 ↗
27. Automated construction by contour crafting - related robotics and information technologies10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 ↗
28. Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026 ↗
29. The effect of aggregation on city sustainability rankings10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106076 ↗
30. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z ↗
31. Rheology and buildability of sustainable cement-based composites containing micro-crystalline cellulose for 3D-printing10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118054 ↗
32. A systematical review of 3D printable cementitious materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.144 ↗
33. Effect of drying environment on mechanical properties, internal RH and pore structure of 3D printed concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125731 ↗
34. Integrating urban metabolism and life cycle assessment to analyse urban sustainability10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106074 ↗
35. Method of enhancing interlayer bond strength in construction scale 3D printing with mortar by effective bond area amplification10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107684 ↗
36. Underwater 3D printing of cement-based mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.134 ↗
37. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing with cement-based materials – Production steps, processes, and their underlying physics: A review10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106037 ↗
38. Effectiveness of the rheometric methods to evaluate the build-up of cementitious mortars used for 3D printing10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119551 ↗
39. Relating print velocity and extrusion characteristics of 3D-printable cementitious binders: implications towards testing methods
40. Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar
41. Challenges, opportunities and future directions of smart manufacturing: a state of art review10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100023 ↗
42. On site deployment of 3D printing for the building construction - the case of YhnovaTM10.1051/matecconf/201816301001 ↗
43. Additive manufacturing-state of art10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.728 ↗
44. 3D Printing of buildings in UAE: success and failure factors
45. Peer-review under responsibility of KES10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.562 ↗
46. Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing*10.1080/17452759.2018.1476064 ↗
47. Towards a lean behaviour evaluation system in Latin American construction
48. Laser based additive manufacturing in industry and academia10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.011 ↗
49. Composite alkali-activated materials with waste tire rubber designed for additive manufacturing: an eco-sustainable and energy saving approach10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.213 ↗
50. 3D Printing for veterinary anatomy: an overview10.1111/ahe.12502 ↗
51. A feasible method for measuring the buildability of fresh 3D printing mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.326 ↗
52. Optimal machine operation planning for construction by contour crafting10.1016/j.autcon.2012.08.006 ↗
53. Rheological and harden properties of the high-thixotropy 3D printing concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.061 ↗