Push-out test of waste sawdust-based steel-concrete – Steel composite sections: Experimental and environmental study
Source abstract
Abstract
Considering their cost and strength benefits over traditional reinforced concrete, steel–concrete–steel (SCS) structural systems have become increasingly popular. The ultimate strength, ductility index, failure modes, cost, environment, and energy absorption capacities of SCS filled with sawdust concrete were explored in this study to better understand the impact of using SCS in modern structural projects. Wood chips were employed as an infill material to minimize the section's weight and expense. Push-out monotonic loading was used to inspect the mechanical characteristics of six SCS samples. One sample was built using the typical normal-weight concrete core to serve as a standard, while the other samples were made with changed core materials by partially replacing the fine aggregate with sawdust. The discovered failure modes are explained and analyzed, with the ultimate strength, ductility, and energy absorption index. The research suggests that recycled lightweight infill concrete has a slightly lesser effect on the performance of the SCS than conventional concrete (less than 10 %). It was observed that the percentage of sawdust had an impact on the specimens' compressive strengths, with the strength decreasing from 65 to 48 MPa as the sawdust levels climbed from 7.27 % to 29.63 %. The energy absorption of the SCS sawdust concrete was lower than the control sample. Conversely, the ductility index of the control specimen was higher than those of waste wood SCS samples. The results also revealed that using sawdust material has a positive impact on the economic and environmental systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Municipal solid waste (Msw) and construction and demolition (C&D) wood waste generation and recovery in the United States
2. Waste wood as bioenergy feedstock. Climate change impacts and related emission uncertainties from waste wood based energy systems in the UK10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.042 ↗
3. Role of wood waste as source of biomass fuel in the UK10.1179/174892312X13269692038815 ↗
4. Effective use of sawdust for the production of eco-friendly and thermal-energy efficient normal weight and lightweight concretes with tailored fracture properties10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.009 ↗
5. Evaluation of rubberized fibre mortar exposed to elevated temperature using destructive and non-destructive testing10.1007/s12205-016-0721-0 ↗
6. Flexural ductility performance of hybrid-recycled aggregate reinforced concrete T-beam10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.747 ↗
7. Shear behavior of exploiting recycled brick waste and steel slag as an alternative aggregate for concrete production10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.591 ↗
8. Lightweight composite concrete produced with water treatment sludge and sawdust: thermal properties and potential application10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.012 ↗
9. Investigation of properties of concrete using sawdust as partial replacement for sand
10. Uses of sawdust as admixture in production of low-cost and lightweight hollow sandcrete blocks
11. Performance of saw-dust in low cost sandcrete blocks
12. The use of sawdust ash as fine aggregate replacement in concrete
13. Experiment
14. Flexural behavior of steel–concrete–steel sandwich slabs
15. Experimental behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with truss configuration of shear connectors10.31026/j.eng.2016.04.02 ↗
16. Push-out test of steel-concrete-steel composite section for pre-installation and post-installation techniques of shear connectors10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.862.12 ↗
17. Push-out test of steel–concrete–steel composite sections with various core materials: behavioural study10.1007/s43452-021-00173-y ↗
18. Lightweight steel–concrete–steel sandwich system with J-hook connectors10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.01.013 ↗
19. Impact tests on steel–concrete–steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.007 ↗
20. Cyclic stress–strain rate-dependent response of rubberised concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119253 ↗
21. Experimental assessment and constitutive modelling of rubberised concrete materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.086 ↗
22. A.I.C.C. on C. and C. Aggregates, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, 2014.
23. Engineering properties of waste sawdust-based lightweight alkali-activated concrete: experimental assessment and numerical prediction10.3390/ma13235490 ↗
24. S.H. BEng, S. Park, EN 1994-Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures, Rep. E Steel Constr. Institute, Berkshire, UK. (1994).
25. K. Gunup, E.M. D., K.R. E., Parametric Studies and Preliminary Design Recommendations on the Use of Postinstalled Shear Connectors for Strengthening Noncomposite Steel Bridges, J. Bridg. Eng. 17 (2012) 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943–5592.0000261.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000261 ↗
26. L.C. Hoang, Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity, (2016).
27. K.E. Buttry, Behavior of stud shear connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete, (1965).
28. Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete, AISC Eng’g Jr., April 1971 (71-10)
29. LA: push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete10.1016/0143-974X(94)00036-H ↗
30. J.M. Aribert, Dimensionnement de poutres mixtes en connection partielle, in: Mix. Struct. Incl. New Mater. IABSE Symp. Brussels, 1990: pp. 215–220.
31. EPPIB, Partial shear connection in composite beams for buildings
32. Behavior of composite beams prestressed with external tendons: experimental study10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.01.007 ↗
33. Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(623) ↗
34. Pimentel-Gomes · 2000 · 15
35. A hybrid computational approach to derive new ground-motion prediction equations10.1016/j.engappai.2011.01.005 ↗