Application of high viscosity-high modulus modified asphalt concrete in bus rapid transit station pavement–A case study in Chengdu, China
Source abstract
Abstract
The pavement of bus rapid transit (BRT) stations is subjected to highly channelized load caused by buses, which can cause serious distresses and may lead to early failure. For asphalt pavements, rutting is the most common distress under such conditions. In this study, a case study of the latest BRT paving project in Chengdu, China was introduced. Two asphalt mixtures were designed to serve as the station pavement surface. PG 76-22 asphalt was modified with high viscosity and high modulus addictive to further improve its mechanical properties. The effects of the modification were validated by a series of Hamburg wheel tracking tests. The test results suggested that gap-graded mix performed better in rutting resistance than dense-graded specimens. Modification with high viscosity agents could significantly inhibit rutting propagation. If the mix was modified with both high viscosity and high modulus agents, it would be able to avoid stripping under the most severe test condition. As for project implementation, a life cycle cost analysis was carried out to compare different paving plans. The construction process of BRT pavement was elaborated with detailed description and photos, explaining base treatment, paving, compaction, and quality control, which could help guide the construction of future BRT paving projects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Runcorn a rapid transit new town?
2. BRT+ Centre of Excellence and EMBARQ, Global BRTData, 2021. [Online]. Available: 〈http://www.brtdata.org〉.
3. Recent developments in bus rapid transit: a review of the literature10.1080/01441647.2010.492455 ↗
4. Bus rapid transit systems: a comparative assessment10.1007/s11116-008-9163-y ↗
5. Impact of bus rapid transit systems on road safety: lessons from Bogotá, Colombia10.3141/2317-01 ↗
6. The potential for bus rapid transit to reduce transportation-related CO2 emissions10.5038/2375-0901.9.3.12 ↗
7. Comparison of emissions from light rail transit and bus rapid transit10.1177/0361198105192700104 ↗
8. Bus rapid transit systems in Latin America and Asia: results and difficulties in 11 cities10.3141/2072-09 ↗
9. Assessment of pavement damage from bus rapid transit: case study for Nevada10.3141/2591-09 ↗
10. Field evaluation of red-coloured hot mix asphalt pavements for bus rapid transit lanes in Ontario, Canada10.3390/coatings7050058 ↗
11. C.L. Monismith, S.L. Weissman, L. Popescu, N.J. Santero, Establishing Infrastructure Requirements for Bus Rapid Transportation Operations in Dedicated Bus Lanes (No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2008-32), 2008.
12. L.J. Ebels, BRT and Public Transport Networks–Pavement Design Considerations for Bus Lanes. in: Proceedings of the 80th IMESA Conference, 2016.
13. Development and uses of hard-grade asphalt and of high-modulus asphalt mixes in France
14. Performance evaluation of high modulus asphalt mixtures for long life asphalt pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.01.003 ↗
15. Assessing permanent deformation resistance of high modulus asphalt mixtures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:5(394) ↗
16. Effect in the high modulus asphalt concrete with the temperature10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.088 ↗
17. Investigation on high-viscosity asphalt binder for permeable asphalt concrete with waste materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.010 ↗
18. Evaluation of weathering aging on resistance of high viscosity modified asphalt to permanent deformation and fatigue damage10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120683 ↗
19. Performance research of high-viscosity asphalt mixture as deck-paving materials for steel bridges10.1080/14680629.2016.1163279 ↗
20. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development CJJ-1, Code for Construction and Quality Acceptance of Road Works in City and town, China Architecture Publishing & Media Co. Ltd., Beijing, China, 2008.
21. AASHTO M 320, Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder, AASHTO, Washington, DC., 2017.
22. AASHTO T 315, Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC., 2020.
23. AASHTO T313, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC., 2019.
24. AASHTO T350-19, Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC., 2019.
25. T.D. White, Marshall procedures for design and quality control of asphalt mixtures. in: Asphalt Paving Technology: Proceedings, vol. 54, San Antonio, TX, 1985.
26. AASHTO, Standard Method of Test for Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
27. AASHTO T322, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Creep Compliance and Strength of Hot-mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Indirect Tensile Test Device, AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
28. Feasibility of deformation strength for estimation of rut resistance of asphalt concrete10.1080/14680629.2004.9689974 ↗
29. Ministry of Transportation JTG E20, Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering, Ministry of Transportation of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2011.
30. AASHTO T324, Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures, AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
31. Evaluation of Hamburg wheel-tracking device to predict moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt
32. Use of the Hamburg wheel-tracking device for evaluating moisture susceptibility of hot-mix asphalt10.3141/1681-10 ↗
33. Novel method for moisture susceptibility and rutting evaluation using Hamburg wheel tracking test10.3141/2446-01 ↗
34. Determining the relationship among hamburg wheel-tracking test parameters and correlation to field performance of asphalt pavements10.1177/0361198120912430 ↗
35. Prediction model for field rut depth of asphalt pavement based on Hamburg wheel tracking test properties10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001946 ↗
36. Investigation of the rutting performance of various modified asphalt mixtures using the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device test and Multiple Stress Creep Recovery test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.015 ↗
37. Effect of mix gradation on rutting potential of dense-graded asphalt mixtures10.3141/1767-18 ↗
38. A micromechanical approach to investigate asphalt concrete rutting mechanisms10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.041 ↗
39. Multi-stress loading effect on rutting performance of asphalt mixtures based on wheel tracking testing10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.182 ↗
40. Rheological behaviors of epoxy asphalt binder in comparison of base asphalt binder and SBS modified asphalt binder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.020 ↗
41. Investigation into engineering properties and strength mechanism of grouted macadam composite materials10.1080/10298436.2015.1024467 ↗
42. A state of the art of semi-flexible pavements: introduction, design, and performance10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119196 ↗