Experimental performance evaluation of elastic friction damper
Source abstract
Abstract
Earthquakes are natural disasters that can cause large-scale damage to humans and property. Many methods have been proposed to reduce the damage caused by earthquakes. These include dampers that are applied to structures to provide seismic reinforcement. Dampers absorb energy and reduce the response to earthquakes. However, in the case of an earthquake exceeding the allowable capacity, dampers may be damaged or permanently deformed, resulting in replacement of the dampers incurring considerable economic losses. In this study, to solve this problem, a new concept of an elastic friction damper that can reduce damage by applying a new material with recentering performance was developed; the performance of the damper was evaluated by experiments. The elastic friction damper is composed of polyurethane springs that provide recentering force by applying precompression, steel wires and permanent magnet cubes that provide energy dissipation capability. First, for the performance evaluation, a compression experiment was conducted to obtain the ideal precompression value of the polyurethane spring. In addition, a tensile experiment was performed to determine the elastic section and ductility of the steel wire. The frictional force generated by the attachment of permanent magnet cubes was determined in a previous research. Using these results, a detailed design of the elastic friction damper was developed, and six specimens were built for structural experiments. The design parameters of the specimens were set according to the precompression force applied on the polyurethane and the presence or absence of permanent magnets. The structural experiments were performed according to the loading protocol in which the displacement was increased as much as the elastic section of the steel wires. The results of the structural experiments showed that as the precompression value increased, the energy dissipation and the maximum load value increased. The friction behavior of the permanent magnet cubes continued until the end of the structural experiments. As a result of the experiment, SPM3 damper with 20% precompressed polyurethane spring and permanent magnet cube had the best maximum load and energy dissipation capacity, and SP3 damper without permanent magnet cube had the best recentering force. therefore, the damper incorporating the precompressed polyurethane springs and the permanent magnet cubes effectively reduced the residual strain and showed excellent performance in terms of the recentering force and the energy dissipation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behavior10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:3(381) ↗
2. A new type of damper with friction-variable characteristics10.1007/s11803-009-9121-5 ↗
3. Full‐scale hybrid test for realistic verification of a seismic upgrading technique of RC frames by BRBs10.1002/eqe.3312 ↗
4. Innovative metal systems for seismic upgrading of RC structures10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.017 ↗
5. Optimal design of rotational friction dampers for improving seismic performance of inelastic structures
6. Plastic analysis of braced frames by application of metaheuristic optimization algorithms10.1007/s13296-020-00347-z ↗
7. Plastic design of seismic resistant v-braced frames10.1080/13632460802211867 ↗
8. Seismic collapse behavior of steel structures with a smart axial polyurethane friction damper
9. Seismic upgrading of existing masonry structures: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107428 ↗
10. Computational study of self-centering buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance10.1002/eqe.2428 ↗
11. Experimental study of hysteretic steel damper for energy dissipation capacity10.1155/2015/631726 ↗
12. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.005 ↗
13. Low-cycled hysteresis characteristics of circular hollow steel damper subjected to inelastic behavior10.1007/s13296-018-0097-8 ↗
14. Seismic performance of Transverse Steel Damper seismic system for long span bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.014 ↗
15. Use of different shaped steel slit dampers in beam to column connections of steel frames under cycling loading
16. Yielding steel dampers as restraining devices to control seismic sliding of laminated rubber bearings for highway bridges: analytical and experimental study10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001487 ↗
17. Dynamic loading tests and seismic response analysis of a stud‐type damper composed of multiple friction units with disc springs10.1002/eqe.3289 ↗
18. Energy response of a passive variable friction damper and numerical simulation on the control effects for high‐rise buildings10.1002/stc.3124 ↗
19. Loading tests of a brace-type multi-unit friction damper using coned disc springs and numerical assessment of its seismic response control effects10.1007/s10518-019-00671-8 ↗
20. Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00102-X ↗
21. Response of friction damped braced frames
22. Seismic response control effects for reinforced-concrete buildings incorporating a passive variable friction device
23. Dual-pipe damper10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.004 ↗
24. E-shape steel damper destruction mechanism research10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.189.260 ↗
25. Inspection of U-shaped steel dampers based on residual plastic deformation10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112915 ↗
26. Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.003 ↗
27. Built in dampers for family homes via SMA: An ANSYS computation scheme based on mesoscopic and microscopic experimental analyses10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.028 ↗
28. Development and test of a self-centering fluidic viscous damper10.1177/1369433220920464 ↗
29. Feasibility study on a superelastic SMA damper with re-centring capability10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.073 ↗
30. Self-centering frictional damper (SCFD10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109425 ↗
31. Stress-strain behavior of a polyurethane rubber in combined torsion and tension or compression
32. Cyclic compressive behavior of polyurethane rubber springs for smart dampers
33. Experimental study on the behavior of polyurethane springs for compression members10.3390/app112110223 ↗
34. An experimental study on the performance of a damper fabricated by dual rubber springs10.1007/s13296-020-00385-7 ↗
35. Analytical and experimental studies on an innovative steel damper reinforced polyurethane bearing for seismic isolation applications
36. Experimental analysis of the effects of a polyurethane foam on geotechnical seismic isolation10.1080/13632469.2020.1779871 ↗
37. Improvement of the polyurethane spring isolation device for HV post insulators and its evaluation by fragility curves
38. Friction between steel plates under the influence of magnetic field10.5755/j01.mech.23.2.13839 ↗
39. S.E. Gay, M. Ehsani, Analysis and experimental testing of a permanent magnet Eddy-Current brake, in: 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2005, 756–765, https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554643.10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554643 ↗
40. Development of a new passive-active magnetic damper for vibration suppression10.1115/1.2172258 ↗
41. On the design of a linear composite magnetic damper10.1109/TMAG.2015.2440770 ↗
42. Optimal design of MR damper via finite element analyses of fluid dynamic and magnetic field10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.05.007 ↗
43. Permanent magnet machines for modulated damping of seismic vibrations: electrical and thermal modeling10.1109/TIE.2008.928105 ↗
44. Planar arrangement of permanent magnets in design of a magneto-solid damper by finite element method10.1177/1045389X20905968 ↗
45. Smart damper using the combination of magnetic friction and pre-compressed rubber springs10.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.028 ↗