Cyclic response of precast concrete shear walls with reduced grouted sleeves or corrugated metallic duct splices
Source abstract
Abstract
The structural behavior of precast concrete shear walls (PSWs) is highly dependent on their vertical connections. Current PSWs mainly use two-row (paired) connections, which is relatively time-consuming and involves high cost and construction difficulties on wall assembly. Reducing the number of vertical connections from two-row to one-row or even partial could be economical and efficient solutions for the use of PSWs in practice. Reversed cyclic tests on seven full scale shear wall specimens were conducted under the axial compression ratio of 0.24. Grouted steel sleeves (GS) and grouted corrugated metallic duct (CMD) connections were used in the test program, considering three different layouts: two-row, one-row and partial. Test results showed that all shear walls failed by flexural-shear. The PSWs exhibited more and plumper hysteretic curves than the monolithic wall. The load carrying capacity of PSWs was close to the monolithic wall with an average difference of less than 7%. The displacement ductility coefficients of the PSWs with two-row, one-row and partial GS were 2.5, 2.8 and 2.6 respectively, which were slightly higher than that of the monolithic specimen (2.2). The ductility of the PSWs with CMD were2.3, 2.9 and 2.3. It was also indicated that PSWs with GS or CMD connections had greater energy dissipation capacity than the monolithic shear wall. The decline in stiffness and energy dissipation capacities of all precast specimens were similar.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Guyer · 2015
2. Englekirk · 2003
3. Steinle · 2019
4. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI), PCI Design Handbook, Chicago, IL, 2017.
5. Grout-filled pipe splices for precast concrete construction10.15554/pcij.01011995.82.93 ↗
6. Precast reinforced concrete shear walls: state of the art review10.1002/suco.201800129 ↗
7. GB/T 51231-2016, Technical Code for Assembled Buildings with Concrete Structure, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, 2016.
8. JGJ 1-2014 · 2014
9. Cyclic performance of precast concrete shear walls with a mortar–sleeve connection for longitudinal steel bars10.1617/s11527-015-0660-0 ↗
10. Seismic performance of precast shear wall with sleeves connection based on experimental and numerical studies10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.026 ↗
11. Mueller P.. Seismic behavior of precast walls, in: Proceedings of Third U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, 1986.
12. Horizontal connections for precast concrete shear walls subjected to cyclic deformations part 1: mild steel connections10.15554/pcij.07011995.78.96 ↗
13. Experimental testing on emulative connections for precast columns using grouted corrugated steel sleeves10.1007/s10518-014-9715-9 ↗
14. Experimental study of prefabricated RC column-foundation assemblies with two different connection methods and using large-diameter reinforcing bars10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110075 ↗
15. Investigation and verification on seismic behavior of precast concrete frame piers used in real bridge structures: experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.069 ↗
16. Behavior and splice length of deformed bars lapping in spirally confined grout-filled corrugated duct10.1155/2019/5280986 ↗
17. Seismic design of lightly reinforced precast concrete rectangular wall panels10.15554/pcij.07012002.104.121 ↗
18. Xue W., Huang Q., Yang J., Li Z. , Report: Experimental investigations on precast concrete wall panels under cyclic loads. ongji University, College of Civil Engineering, Shanghai (in Chinese). (2021).
19. GB 50011-2010 · 2016
20. GB 50010-2010 · 2015
21. American Concrete Institute. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills, 2019, ACI 318R-19.
22. JGJ 101-2015. Specification of test methods for earthquake resistant building. Ministry of Housing and Urban - Rural Development. Beijing. China.
23. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing
24. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP), Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, 2020.
25. EN 1998-1:2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, 2004.
26. DG/TJ 08-2071-2016 · 2016