Early-age compressive strength prediction of cemented phosphogypsum backfill using lab experiments and ensemble learning models
Source abstract
Abstract
The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cemented phosphogypsum (PG) backfill is an important mechanical index that determines the stope safety. However, the traditional mechanical test is costly and time-consuming. In this study, UCS test were conducted to establish the dataset for model construction. The dataset contained 81 UCS results with different combinations of influencing variables, including the pH of PG, the electrical conductivity (EC) of PG, the pH of backfill slurry, the binder/PG ratio, the solid concentration, and the curing age. Six ensemble learning models, including AdaBoost, gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), the light gradient boosting model (LGBM), random forest (RF), and extremely randomized trees (ExtraTrees), were constructed to predict the UCS of cemented PG backfill. The results show that the six ensemble learning models obtained values of root means square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and coefficient of determination (R2) in the test set ranging from 0.050 MPa to 0.113 MPa, 0.034–0.154 MPa, and 0.933–0.990, respectively, and these exhibited smaller errors than standalone machine learning models. Moreover, the XGBoost model performed the best among the six ensemble learning methods, with RMSE= 0.050 MPa, MAE= 0.034 MPa, and R2 = 0.990 for the test set. The study revealed the satisfactory prediction performance of ensemble learning models for the UCS of cemented PG backfill. Among six models, this study recommends XGBoost model as a reliable tool for quick and accurate prediction of the UCS of cemented PG backfill.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tailings Management and Properties · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Underground infrastructure and sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Mix proportioning of underground cemented tailings backfill10.1016/j.tust.2006.08.005 ↗
2. Dynamics of metals in backfill of a phosphate mine of guiyang, China using a three-step sequential extraction technique10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.161 ↗
3. Recycling lead-zinc tailings for cemented paste backfill and stabilisation of excessive metal10.3390/min9110710 ↗
4. Cemented paste backfill for mineral tailings management: review and future perspectives10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106025 ↗
5. Influence of solid content, cement/tailings ratio, and curing time on rheology and strength of cemented tailings backfill10.3390/min10100922 ↗
6. Flexural behavior of fiber reinforced cemented tailings backfill under three-point bending10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2943479 ↗
7. Exploring the link between ultrasonic and strength behavior of cementitious mine backfill by considering pore structure10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130588 ↗
8. Spatial distribution and leaching behavior of pollutants from phosphogypsum stocked in a gypstack: Geochemical characterization and modeling10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.055 ↗
9. Pollutant flows from a phosphogypsum disposal area to an estuarine environment: an insight from geochemical signatures10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.070 ↗
10. Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007 ↗
11. Experimental study on backfilling mine goafs with chemical waste phosphogypsum
12. Immobilization of phosphogypsum for cemented paste backfill and its environmental effect10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.046 ↗
13. Industrial experiment of goaf filling using the filling materials based on hemihydrate phosphogypsum10.3390/min10040324 ↗
14. Non-explosive mining and waste utilization for achieving green mining in underground hard rock mine in China10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65099-5 ↗
15. Basics of paste backfill systems
16. Alkali-activated binders based on ground granulated blast furnace slag and phosphogypsum10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.194 ↗
17. Application of lime neutralised phosphogypsum in supersulfated cement10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122660 ↗
18. Utilisation of water-washing pre-treated phosphogypsum for cemented paste backfill10.3390/min9030175 ↗
19. Effect of phosphorus on the properties of phosphogypsum-based cemented backfill10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122993 ↗
20. Factors influencing pile friction bearing capacity: proposing a novel procedure based on gradient boosted tree technique10.3390/su132111862 ↗
21. Prediction of peak particle velocity caused by blasting through the combinations of Boosted-CHAID and SVM models with various kernels10.3390/app11083705 ↗
22. A novel systematic and evolved approach based on XGBoost-firefly algorithm to predict Young's modulus and unconfined compressive strength of rock10.1007/s00366-020-01241-2 ↗
23. Prediction of surface chloride concentration of marine concrete using ensemble machine learning10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106164 ↗
24. To predict the compressive strength of self compacting concrete with recycled aggregates utilizing ensemble machine learning models
25. Compressive strength prediction of high-performance concrete using gradient tree boosting machine10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120198 ↗
26. High-performance concrete strength prediction based on ensemble learning10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126694 ↗
27. Prediction of the sulfate resistance for recycled aggregate concrete based on ensemble learning algorithms10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125917 ↗
28. Predicting uniaxial tensile strength of expansive soil with ensemble learning methods10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104904 ↗
29. Implementing ensemble learning methods to predict the shear strength of RC deep beams with/without web reinforcements10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111979 ↗
30. Day-ahead city natural gas load forecasting based on decomposition-fusion technique and diversified ensemble learning model10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117623 ↗
31. Ensemble machine learning model for corrosion initiation time estimation of embedded steel reinforced self-compacting concrete10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108141 ↗
32. Using particle swarm optimization algorithm in an artificial neural network to forecast the strength of paste filling material10.1016/S1006-1266(08)60292-8 ↗
33. Strength investigation of the cemented paste backfill in alpine regions using lab experiments and machine learning10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126583 ↗
34. The use of artificial neural networks to predict the effect of sulphate attack on the strength of cemented paste backfill10.1007/s10064-010-0326-7 ↗
35. Neural network and particle swarm optimization for predicting the unconfined compressive strength of cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.006 ↗
36. Artificial intelligence model for studying unconfined compressive performance of fiber-reinforced cemented paste backfill10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65563-2 ↗
37. Integrated and intelligent design framework for cemented paste backfill: A combination of robust machine learning modelling and multi-objective optimization10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106422 ↗
38. Z. Yao,2009. Technoligical study and reliability analysis of yellow phosphorus slag and phosphgysum backfill in Kaiyang mine, Central South University, Changsha, 2009.
39. Effect of mixing time on the properties of phosphogypsum-based cemented backfill10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.187 ↗
40. Plastic hinge length of rectangular RC columns using ensemble machine learning model10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112808 ↗
41. Bühlmann · 2012
42. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
43. T. Chen, C. Guestrin, C.M. Assoc, 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system, in: 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), San Francisco, CA, 2016, pp. 785–794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
44. G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, T. Liu, 2017. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, in: 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Long Beach, CA, 2017.
45. Bagging predictors10.1023/A:1018054314350 ↗
46. Predicting wind pressures around circular cylinders using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104099 ↗
47. Identifying the influential features on the regional energy use intensity of residential buildings based on Random Forests10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.096 ↗
48. Random forest based hourly building energy prediction10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.008 ↗
49. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
50. Prediction of the interfacial disturbance wave velocity in vertical upward gas-liquid annular flow via ensemble learning10.1016/j.energy.2021.122990 ↗
51. Experimental investigation on the relationship between pore characteristics and unconfined compressive strength of cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.224 ↗
52. Predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition: a comparative study among six XGB-based metaheuristic techniques10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.020 ↗
53. Compressive strength evaluation of ultra-high-strength concrete by machine learning10.3390/ma15103523 ↗
54. Artificial intelligence-based estimation of ultra-high-strength concrete's flexural property
55. Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration10.1007/s00366-021-01393-9 ↗
56. A strength prediction model using artificial intelligence for recycling waste tailings as cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.154 ↗