journal article·2020-12Open access

Evaluating the interaction between engineered materials and aircraft tyres as arresting systems in landing overrun events

Misagh Ketabdari, Emanuele Toraldo, Maurizio Crispino, Vardhman Lunkar

Abstract

According to the registered databases of air accidents around the world, landing overruns are the most probable accidents among all runway excursion events. Although new aircraft are enhanced with the latest technologies that improve the maneuvers safety, the frequency of landing overruns are bound to increase because of the ascending growth rate of annual traffic. The principal scope of this paper is to evaluate the functionality of Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS) as a mitigation strategy to reduce the possible consequences of landing overrun events and in particular to determine if installing an EMAS can help land-locked airports to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommendations in order to upgrade their Runway End Safety Areas (RESAs). In the previous studies, not enough investigations are dedicated to predicting the behavior of the aircraft and its deceleration rate after interfering EMAS and how different materials as arrestor beds would modify aircraft braking distance in RESA. Therefore, secondary objective of this paper is to determine the most optimum height of EMAS slabs, in function of execution costs and accident severity reduction rate. In this regard, a MATLAB®-based numerical code, which simulate the tire-pavement interface, is developed in order to evaluate the functionality of EMAS for aircraft ground maneuvers. Although this code is developed for both dry and wet runway conditions, dry runway’s surface is selected as the boundary condition of this study. It simulates aircraft arresting distance by calculating a dynamic skid resistance between aircraft main gear and runway pavement with a fix time step. The results are plotted as risk contour intervals on the layout of EMAS that is installed at the RESA. In addition, this numerical code is adopted in order to perform a sensitivity analysis on five arresting bed materials, which consist of three low-density concretes with maximum crushing stress thresholds of 172500, 345000 and 930000 Pa, one gravel-based material and one foam aggregate-based mixture. Among all, low-density concrete with the highest crushing strength causes shorter aircraft arresting distance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Traffic Management and Optimization · Traffic and Road Safety · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 2014
2. 2010
3. 2004
4. 2005
5. Aircraft response in an airfield arrestor system during an overrun10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000331 ↗
6. Heymsfield · 2009
7. David · 1990
8. The normalisation of aircraft overrun accident data10.1016/S0969-6997(03)00033-4 ↗
9. Hall · 2008
10. Sensitivity analysis of influencing factors in probabilistic risk assessment for airports10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.005 ↗
11. Improving runway strip performance to fulfill international requirements through eco-efficient soil treatments: case study of a major italian airport
12. International Civil Aviation Administration, ICAO · 2013 · Vol. 1
13. Cook · 1987
14. Cook · 1985
15. Predicting aircraft stopping distances within an EMAS10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000600 ↗
16. Jet stopping distance and behaviour in a regional airport EMAS
17. Ketabdari · 2019 · 731
18. Clancy · 1975
19. Loftin · 1985
20. Sensitivity analysis of engineered material arrestor systems to aircraft and arrestor material characteristics10.3141/2052-13 ↗
21. Pasindu · 2011 · 126