Efficient boosting-based algorithms for shear strength prediction of squat RC walls
Source abstract
Abstract
Reinforced concrete shear walls have been considered as an effective structural system due to their optimal cost and great behavior in resisting lateral loads. For the slender type of these walls, failure modes are mainly related to flexure, while for the squat type with height-to-length ratios less than two, shear is the dominant factor. Thus, accurate estimation of shear strength for squat shear walls is necessary for design applications and can also be complex due to the various effective parameters. In order to address this issue, first a comprehensive dataset with 558 samples of squat shear walls is conducted, and three hybrid models consisting of genetic algorithms and boosting-based ensemble learning methods, i.e., XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, are used for estimation of shear strength. The results showed high prediction accuracy, with a coefficient of determination of at least 98.6% for all three models. Genetic algorithm has been proven to be an effective method for tuning boosting-based algorithms compared to manual testing. In addition, the results of the algorithms are compared to their default hyperparameters and other conventional regression Models. Also, multicollinearity and principal component analysis (PCA) were studied. Furthermore, the performance of three tuned models is compared with that of a mechanics-based semi-empirical model and other genetic programming (GP)-based models. Finally, parametric and sensitivity analyses were performed, to demonstrate the ability of the models to identify the most critical parameters with significant influence on shear strength.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of squat RC structural walls with limited ductility reinforcing details10.1080/13632469.2014.962669 ↗
2. Flange effects on seismic performance of reinforced concrete squat walls with irregular or regular openings10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.051 ↗
3. Shear strength of squat walls: A strut-and-tie model and closed-form design formula10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.027 ↗
4. Probabilistic development of shear strength model for reinforced concrete squat walls10.1002/eqe.2834 ↗
5. Evaluation of softened truss model for strength prediction of reinforced concrete squat walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:8(839) ↗
6. Strength prediction of squat structural walls via calibration of a shear–flexure interaction model10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.018 ↗
7. Shear strength of squat rectangular reinforced concrete walls
8. Seismic performance parameter quantification of shear-critical reinforced concrete masonry squat walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000713 ↗
9. Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816 ↗
10. Machine learning–based failure mode recognition of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns: Comparative study10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002402 ↗
11. Data-driven machine-learning-based seismic failure mode identification of reinforced concrete shear walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110331 ↗
12. Machine learning algorithms for structural performance classifications and predictions: Application to reinforced masonry shear walls10.1016/j.istruc.2019.06.017 ↗
13. Failure mode classification and bearing capacity prediction for reinforced concrete columns based on ensemble machine learning algorithm10.1016/j.aei.2020.101126 ↗
14. Data-driven approach to predict the plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns and its application10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002852 ↗
15. Development of user-friendly kernel-based Gaussian process regression model for prediction of load-bearing capacity of square concrete-filled steel tubular members10.1617/s11527-021-01646-5 ↗
16. Hybrid machine learning model and Shapley additive explanations for compressive strength of sustainable concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127298 ↗
17. Interpretable XGBoost-SHAP Machine-Learning Model for Shear Strength Prediction of Squat RC Walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003115 ↗
18. Mechanics-guided genetic programming expression for shear-strength prediction of squat reinforced concrete walls with boundary elements10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002734 ↗
19. Development of prediction models for shear strength of SFRCB using a machine learning approach10.1007/s00521-015-1997-6 ↗
20. Machine learning model for predicting the crack detection and pattern recognition of geopolymer concrete beams10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123785 ↗
21. R. Elshawi, M. Maher, and S. Sakr, “Automated machine learning: State-of-the-art and open challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02287, 2019.
22. Kuhn · 2013 · 26
23. An effective algorithm for hyperparameter optimization of neural networks10.1147/JRD.2017.2709578 ↗
24. Automated machine learning: methods, systems, challenges
25. S. Abreu, “Automated architecture design for deep neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10714, 2019.
26. Steinholtz · 2018
27. Q. Yao et al., “Taking human out of learning applications: A survey on automated machine learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.13306, 2018.
28. Lessmann · 2005 · 74
29. P. R. Lorenzo, J. Nalepa, M. Kawulok, L. S. Ramos, and J. R. Pastor, “Particle swarm optimization for hyper-parameter selection in deep neural networks,” in Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, 2017, pp. 481–488.10.1145/3071178.3071208 ↗
30. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 ↗
31. M. Jain, “Hyperparameter tuning in XGBoost using genetic algorithm”, [Online]. Available: https://towardsdatascience.com/hyperparameter-tuning-in-xgboost-using-genetic-algorithm-17bd2e581b17.
32. Evolutionary Machine Learning: A Survey10.1145/3467477 ↗
33. Machine-learning-assisted shear strength prediction of reinforced concrete beams with and without stirrups
34. Determination of Young’s modulus of jet grouted coalcretes using an intelligent model10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.02.021 ↗
35. Development of ensemble learning models to evaluate the strength of coal-grout materials10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.09.002 ↗
36. An evolutionary approach for modeling of shear strength of RC deep beams10.1617/s11527-013-0039-z ↗
37. Peak shear strength of H-shaped reinforced concrete squat walls
38. Peak shear strength of flanged reinforced concrete squat walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002575 ↗
39. Metaheuristics: review and application10.1080/0952813X.2013.782347 ↗
40. Towards an empirical foundation for assessing bayesian optimization of hyperparameters
41. Population-based optimization in structural engineering: a review
42. Social spammer detection based on PSO-CatBoost
43. Extending MLP ANN hyper-parameters optimization by using genetic algorithm
44. A review of population initialization techniques for evolutionary algorithms10.1109/CEC.2014.6900618 ↗
45. A novel population initialization method for accelerating evolutionary algorithms10.1016/j.camwa.2006.07.013 ↗
46. Time complexity of genetic algorithms on exponentially scaled problems
47. A. Tahmassebi, M. Motamedi, A.H. Alavi, and A.H. Gandomi, An explainable prediction framework for engineering problems: case studies in reinforced concrete members modeling, Eng. Comput., 2021.10.1108/EC-02-2021-0096 ↗
48. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system
49. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
50. Application of improved LightGBM model in blood glucose prediction10.3390/app10093227 ↗
51. Principal component analysis10.1002/wics.101 ↗
52. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
53. N. S. Committee, Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities, Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. Reston, VA, 2005.