Mix design, mechanical properties and durability of the rubberized geopolymer concrete: A review
Source abstract
Abstract
Rubberized geopolymer concrete (RGPC) is an innovative, user and environmentally friendly invention in building materials that require less energy to manufacture and have a lower carbon footprint than cement-based systems, alleviating global warming concerns. It has the potential of reducing the dilemma of disposal of the huge rubber tire wastes by including them in production as a partial substitute for natural fine aggregate. This hereby avoids the depletion of natural mineral aggregates and protects against air, water and soil pollution. The current review shows the feasibility of incorporating waste rubber fibers in geopolymer concrete (GPC), which emits 90% less carbon dioxide when compared with ordinary Portland cement (OPC), to address the issues mentioned above. To the author's knowledge, no comprehensive studies have reviewed the properties, durability, mechanical, mix design and carbon footprint, of RGPC. For strength characterization, this review work analyzed the flexural, split tensile, and compressive strengths of RGPC. To review the durability characterization of RGPC, water absorption, acid resistance, chloride diffusion, sulfate resistance, and water permeability were evaluated. Finally, the outcome of this review concludes that RGPC has distinct, tangible benefits compared with OPC concrete regarding environment protection, durability, and strength properties. Furthermore, RGPC is recommended for producing lightweight concrete and civil engineering structures when compressive strength is not the main property.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Concreto: microestrutura, propriedades e materiais
2. Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions from the global cement industry
3. Valorisation of glass wastes for the development of geopolymer composites – durability, thermal and microstructural properties: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.169 ↗
4. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007 ↗
5. One‐part geopolymers based on thermally treated red mud/NaOH blends10.1111/jace.13231 ↗
6. Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014 ↗
7. Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.121 ↗
8. J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. 5-th edition, 2020.
9. Effects of deicers on the performance of concrete pavements containing air-cooled blast furnace slag and supplementary cementitious materials10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.009 ↗
10. Hydration of cementitious materials, present and future10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.026 ↗
11. The effect of activator concentration on the residual strength of alkali-activated fly ash pastes subjected to thermal load10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.044 ↗
12. A brief on high-volume Class F fly ash as cement replacement–a guide for Civil Engineer10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.10.002 ↗
13. Impacts of EU carbon emission trade directive on energy-intensive industries—Indicative micro-economic analyses10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.002 ↗
14. Cement industry energy and CO2 performance: getting the numbers right
15. Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and what?10.1617/s11527-013-0211-5 ↗
16. Use of waste glass and demolished brick as coarse aggregate in production of sustainable concrete
17. Incorporation of silica fume and waste corn cob ash in cement and concrete for sustainable environment
18. Utilization of industrial and agricultural waste materials for the development of geopolymer concrete-a review
19. Alkali-activated materials10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009 ↗
20. Porous biomass fly ash-based geopolymers with tailored thermal conductivity10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.083 ↗
21. Comparative study of the life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete and CP-II Portland cement concrete10.1590/S1678-86212014000200011 ↗
22. S. Luhar, Performance evaluation of rubberized geopolymer concrete and fly ash based geopolymer mortar, Dr. Diss. MNIT Jaipur. (2017).
23. Thermal resistance of fly ash based rubberized geopolymer concrete
24. Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: an in-depth review
25. JATMA, Tire industry of Japan, Tokyo, 2019.
26. Sustainable development of waste tires recycling technologies–recent advances, challenges and future trends
27. Sustainable approach of applying previous treatment of tire wastes as raw material in cement composites
28. Mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight geopolymer mortar incorporating crumb rubber10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.003 ↗
29. Fiber reinforced geopolymer from synergetic utilization of fly ash and waste tire10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.018 ↗
30. Development of rubberized geopolymer concrete: Strength and durability studies10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.185 ↗
31. Engineering properties of sustainable green concrete incorporating eco-friendly aggregate of crumb rubber: a review10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129251 ↗
32. The effect of scoria, perlite and crumb rubber aggregates on the fresh and mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.031 ↗
33. Behavior of geopolymer concrete deep beams containing waste aggregate of glass and limestone as a partial replacement of natural sand
34. Compressive and flexural characteristics of geopolymer rubberized concrete reinforced with recycled tires steel fibers10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.182 ↗
35. Mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with crumb rubber and steel fiber under ambient and sulfuric acid conditions
36. Fly ash/blast furnace slag-based geopolymer as a potential binder for mine backfilling: effect of binder type and activator concentration10.1155/2019/2028109 ↗
37. Production of high compressive strength geopolymers considering fly ash or slag chemical composition10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002788 ↗
38. Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers10.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6 ↗
39. The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 ↗
40. Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019 ↗
41. Specification for fly ash for use as pozzolana and admixture
42. ASTM C618–19, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA. (n.d.) www.astm.org.
43. Effect of crumb rubber on compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete10.1051/matecconf/20167801063 ↗
44. Utilization of crumb rubber as aggregate in high calcium fly ash geopolymer mortars10.21660/2019.64.12697 ↗
45. Compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with crumb rubber partially replacing sand10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.001 ↗
46. Rubberized geopolymer concrete: Dependence of mechanical properties and freeze-thaw resistance on replacement ratio of crumb rubber10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125248 ↗
47. The effect of different crumb rubber loading on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012079 ↗
48. Mechanical and fresh properties of multi-binder geopolymer mortars incorporating recycled rubber particles10.3390/infrastructures6100146 ↗
49. Enhancing the thermal performance of Class F fly ash-based geopolymer by sodalite10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125574 ↗
50. Effect of magnesium formate as compared with magnesium oxide on the strength enhancement and microstructures of CaO-activated Class F fly ash system10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119140 ↗
51. Effects of ladle slag on Class F fly ash geopolymer: reaction mechanism and high temperature behavior10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104468 ↗
52. Effects of Portland cement on activation mechanism of class F fly ash geopolymer cured under ambient conditions10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.065 ↗
53. Mitigating leachability from fly ash based geopolymer concrete using recycled concrete aggregate (RCA)
54. The effectiveness and mechanisms of superplasticisers in dispersing class F fly ash pastes10.1016/j.powtec.2021.06.054 ↗
55. Effect of various fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag content on concrete properties: experiments and modelling10.3390/ma15093016 ↗
56. Rheology and structural build-up of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide-activated GGBFS mixtures10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104570 ↗
57. Property degradation of seawater sea sand cementitious mortar with GGBFS and glass fiber subjected to elevated temperatures10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.068 ↗
58. Mechanical behavior, durability, thermal performances and microstructure of GGBFS–modified MPC solidified dredged sludge10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124557 ↗
59. The curing times effect on the strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120622 ↗
60. Influence of the degree of crystallinity of added nano-alumina on strength and reaction products of the CaO-activated GGBFS system10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123647 ↗
61. Effect of exposure temperatures on chloride penetration resistance of concrete incorporating polypropylene Fibers, silica fume and metakaolin
62. Effect of metakaolin on the properties of pervious concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128476 ↗
63. Microstructural and mineralogical compositions of metakaolin-lime-recycled gypsum plaster ternary systems
64. Mechanisms of dispersion of metakaolin particles via adsorption of sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde polymer10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.166 ↗
65. 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR spectroscopic studies of activated metakaolin-slag mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126415 ↗
66. Performance of natural clinoptilolite zeolite in the cementitious materials: a comparative study with metakaolin, fly ash, and blast furnace slag
67. Chemical composition of cements produced in Saudi Arabia and its influence on concrete strength10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30828-6 ↗
68. A comparative study on the mechanical properties, autogenous shrinkage and cracking proneness of alkali-activated concrete and ordinary Portland cement concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123418 ↗
69. Experimental investigation into rubber granules and their effects on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.003 ↗
70. Eco-friendly chopped tire rubber as reinforcements in fly ash based geopolymer concrete
71. Influence of acetic acid and calcium hydroxide treatments of rubber waste on the properties of rubberized mortars10.1617/s11527-016-0912-7 ↗
72. Sustainable use of recycled crumb rubbers in eco-friendly alkali activated slag mortar: Dynamic mechanical properties10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.306 ↗
73. Thermal behaviour of hollow blocks and bricks made of concrete doped with waste tyre rubber10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.015 ↗
74. Partial replacement of copper slag with treated crumb rubber aggregates in alkali-activated slag mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119468 ↗
75. Evaluating prediction models of creep and drying shrinkage of self-consolidating concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials/fillers10.3390/app11167345 ↗
76. Investigating mechanical properties and durability of concrete containing recycled rubber ash and fibers10.1007/s10163-021-01192-w ↗
77. Indian standard concrete mix proportioning-guidelines (Second Revision)
78. Thermal properties of siliconized epoxy interpenetrating coatings10.1016/S0300-9440(02)00062-0 ↗
79. N.A. Lloyd, B.V. Rangan, Geopolymer concrete: a review of development and opportunities, in: Proc. 35th Conf. Our World Concr. Struct. Singapore Concr. Institute, Singapore, 2010: pp. 25–27.
80. R. Anuradha, V. Sreevidya, R. Venkatasubramani, B.V. Rangan, Modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard, (2012).
81. M.W. Ferdous, O. Kayali, A. Khennane, A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete, in: Proc. Fourth Asia-Pacific Conf. FRP Struct. (APFIS 2013), Melbourne, Aust., 2013: pp. 11–13.
82. A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.041 ↗
83. Mix design factors and strength prediction of metakaolin-based geopolymer10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.006 ↗
84. A mix design procedure for alkali-activated high-calcium fly ash concrete cured at ambient temperature10.1155/2018/2460403 ↗
85. concrete by using zeolite and waste tyre rubber
86. Development of lightweight rubberized geopolymer concrete by using polystyrene and recycled crumb-rubber aggregates10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003008 ↗
87. Rubberized geopolymer composites: effect of filler surface treatment10.1016/j.jece.2021.105601 ↗
88. Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120753 ↗
89. High calcium fly ash geopolymer containing natural rubber latex as additive
90. Effect of pre-treatment methods of crumb rubber on strength, permeability and acid attack resistance of rubberised geopolymer concrete
91. Strength and durability of geopolymer concrete with high volume rubber replacement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121783 ↗
92. Assessment of the mechanical performance of crumb rubber concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.040 ↗
93. Feasibility of Utilization of Industrial Polyurethane (PU) Rubber Waste in Geopolymer Concrete10.29007/2xq2 ↗
94. Sound barrier properties of sustainable waste rubber/geopolymer concretes10.1007/s13726-014-0304-1 ↗
95. Investigation on polymer–rubber aggregate modified porous concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.006 ↗
96. Development of rubberized geopolymer interlocking bricks
97. Strength and water penetrability of fly ash geopolymer conrete
98. Novel biomass fly ash-based geopolymeric mortars using lime slaker grits as aggregate for applications in construction: Influence of granulometry and binder/aggregate ratio10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.024 ↗
99. Effect of aggregate-binder proportion and curing technique on the strength and water absorption of fly ash-based one-part geopolymer mortars10.1088/1757-899X/1101/1/012022 ↗
100. Sarkaz · 2020