journal article·2023-07Open access

Comparison of asphalt emulsion-based chip seal and hot rubber asphalt-based chip seal

Dongzhao Jin, Lei Yin, Kai Xin, Zhanping You

Abstract

The use of asphalt emulsion chip seal and hot rubber chip seal as pavement preservation techniques has been gaining popularity. This study aims to compare the laboratory performance of asphalt emulsion and hot rubber asphalt used in chip seal applications. Interlayer shear strength (ISS) and interlayer tensile strength (ITS) tests were designed to evaluate the bond quality of the chip seal samples prepared for both materials. The sweep test was used to estimate the aggregate loss of the chip seal on the asphalt pavement. The universal testing machines were used to evaluate the deterioration of the ISS and ITS values under cyclic load conditions, while the tensile and shear bond properties of chip seals under wet-freeze conditions were evaluated using freeze-thaw cycles. Results showed while both materials experienced a decline in their ISS and ITS values following repeated cycles of load and freeze-thaw, the hot rubber chip seal demonstrated significantly higher ISS and ITS values than the asphalt emulsion chip seal (48–111% and 36–102%, respectively). Moreover, the hot rubber chip seal exhibited better performance in terms of aggregate retention and cohesive strength. The aggregate gradation would affect the aggregate retention and cohesive strength. Nonetheless, both treatments are deemed acceptable for pavement maintenance. The weak bond between hot rubber asphalt or asphalt emulsion and aggregate could be attributed to cyclic load and freeze-thaw conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. and Zhanping You, Evaluation of lab performance of stamp sand and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate waste composites without asphalt as road surface materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127569 ↗
2. Sustainable pavement management: integrating economic, technical, and environmental aspects in decision making10.3141/2523-07 ↗
3. Louw, K., D. Rossmann, and D. Cupido. The vialit adhesion test: is it an appropriate test to predict low temperature binder/aggregate failure. in Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'04). 2004. Citeseer.
4. Applicability of modified vialit adhesion test for seal treatment specifications
5. Epps, A.L., C.J. Glover, and R. Barcena, A performance-graded binder specification for surface treatments. 2001.
6. Howard, Isaac L., Mike Hemsley Jr, Gaylon L.. Baumgardner, and Walter Stephens Jordan III, Chip and scrub seal binder evaluation by frosted marble aggregate retention test. 2009.
7. Akilli, A..e.a., Investigation of adhesion properties in chip seals with pull out test. 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress 2012.
8. Kandhal, P.S. and J.B. Motter, Criteria for accepting precoated aggregates for seal coats and surface treatments. 1991.
9. Sensitivity of ASTM D7000 Sweep test to emulsion application rate and aggregate gradation10.3141/2235-11 ↗
10. Laboratory shear bond test for chip-seal under varying environmental and material conditions10.1080/10298436.2019.1662903 ↗
11. Investigation of adhesion and interface bond strength for pavements underlying chip-seal: Effect of asphalt-aggregate combinations and freeze-thaw cycles on chip-seal10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.058 ↗
12. Asphalt mixture with scrap tire rubber and nylon fiber from waste tires: laboratory performance and preliminary ME design analysis10.3390/buildings12020160 ↗
13. Waste cathode-ray-tube glass powder modified asphalt materials: Preparation and characterization10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127949 ↗
14. Cold in-place recycling asphalt mixtures: laboratory performance and preliminary ME design analysis10.3390/ma14082036 ↗
15. Aktaş · Eff. Aggreg. Surf. Prop. chip Seal. Retent. Perform. · 2013 · 44 · 639
16. Development of Loaded Wheel Test for Evaluating Bleeding in Chip Seals10.3141/2481-07 ↗
17. Kim, Y. Richard, Javon Adams, Cassie Castorena, Mohammad Ilias, Jeong Hyuk Im, Hussain Bahia, Preeda Chaturabong, Andrew Hanz, and Petrina T. Johannes, Performance-Related Specifications for Emulsified Asphaltic Binders Used in Preservation Surface Treatments. 2017.10.17226/24694 ↗
18. Boz, Ilker, Yogesh Kumbargeri, M.Emin Kutay, and Syed Waqar Haider, Establishing percent embedment limits to improve chip seal performance. 2018, Michigan. Dept. of Transportation. Research Administration.10.1177/0361198118821370 ↗
19. Kumbargeri, Y.S., M.E. Kutay, and I. Boz, Effect of percent embedment on chip seal performance using FE modeling. 2018.10.1201/9780429457791-141 ↗
20. Developments in 3D surfacing seals FE modelling10.1080/10298430600949852 ↗
21. Kathirgamanathan, P., P. Herrington, and I. McIver. Chip seal finite element model. in Seventh International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control. 2012.
22. Gerber, J., K.J.R.M. Jenkins, and P. Design, Finite element modelling and damage quantification of chip seals. 2017. 18(2): p. 350–361.10.1080/14680629.2016.1213512 ↗
23. Liang, Hehao, Duanyi Wang, Gang Wang, Danning Li, Chi Xu, and Xiayi Liang., Numerical Simulation and Laboratory Testing Verification on the Performance of an Asphalt Pavement Seal Coat with Superficially Permeating and Solidifying Properties. 2019. 47(6).10.1520/JTE20170625 ↗
24. Investigating the effect of binder and aggregate application rates on performance of chip seals via digital image processing and sweep tests10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.089 ↗