journal article·2022-06Open access

Ground penetrating radar inspection of a large concrete spillway: A case-study using SFCW GPR at a hydroelectric dam

Daniel P. Bigman, Dominic J. Day

Abstract

Hydroelectric dams are subject to aging and degradation. The concrete structure under investigation here had visible signs of spalling, cracking, and erosion, but it was unclear how damaged the spillway was below the surface. The asset owners wanted to identify delamination and voids 60 cm or larger so they could mitigate the effects. While most ground penetrating radar (GPR) inspections conducted on dams have been completedusing low frequency ranges between 16 MHz and 500 MHz, these frequencies may overlook small, but critical defects. Our study is the first to use a small hand-held sized stepped frequency continuous wave (SFCW) GPR to acquire information at frequencies ranging up to 4 GHz to evaluate its effectiveness on such a large asset. The two main questions we aimed to answer are: (1) how will a small GPR unit perform on a large, irregular concrete surface, and (2) could the higher frequencies provide more detailed images of small cracks and defects. The study provided useful results in real-time which supported a repair and refurbishment program. The high frequency system allowed for detailed visualization and measurement of reflections events consistent with expectations for delamination and voids. The investigation also identified other non-critical defects that can be targeted for ongoing monitoring programs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. American Rivers, 72 Dams Removed to Restore Rivers in 2016, 2016.
2. Detection of leakage areas in an earth embankment from GPR measurements and permeability logging
3. Ground penetrating radar profiles of the McMurdo Shear Zone, Antarctica, acquired with an unmanned rover: Interpretation of crevassas, fractures, and folds within firn and marine ice10.1190/geo2015-0132.1 ↗
4. Baikovitz A., Sodhi P., Dille M., Kaess. Ground encoding: Learned factor graph-based models for localizing ground penetrating radar. arXiv:2103.15317v1, 2021.10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636764 ↗
5. Bigman · 2018 · 134
6. Bigman · 2019 · 96
7. The roles of macro- and micro-scale geophysical investigations to guide and monitor excavations at a Middle Woodland site in northern Georgia, USA
8. Studying the Construction of Floor Mosaics in the Roman Villa of Pisoes (Portugal) Using Noninvasive Methods: High-Resolution 3D GPR and Photogrammetry10.3390/rs11161882 ↗
9. Void detection beneath reinforced concrete sections: The practical application of ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic techniques10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.003 ↗
10. Determination of water content in fresh concrete mix based on relative dielectric constant measurement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.073 ↗
11. GPR Virtual Guidance System for Subsurface 3D Imaging10.3390/rs13112154 ↗
12. Detection of hazardous cavities below a road using combined geophysical methods
13. Issues related to structural aging in probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00018-0 ↗
14. Challenges and opportunities with drone-mounted GPR10.1190/segam2021-3582927.1 ↗
15. RABIT: implementation, performance validation and integration with other robotic platforms for improved management of bridge decks10.1007/s41315-017-0027-5 ↗
16. Long-term monitoring of spillway using various NDT techniques-case studies10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012035 ↗
17. Assessing the Integrity of Spillway Foundations10.1063/1.4974632 ↗
18. Application of Ground Penetrating Radar in Dam body detection10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2372 ↗
19. 3DGPR for the non-destructive monitoring of subsurface weathering of Sandstone Masonry10.3390/heritage2040173 ↗
20. A performance evaluation of geophysical methods for detecting underground cavity around sewer
21. Automated GPR rebar analysis for robotic bridge deck evaluation10.1109/TCYB.2015.2474747 ↗
22. Kouros G., Kotavelis I., Skartados E., Giakoumis D., Tzovaras D., Simi A., Manacorda G. 3D Underground Mapping with a Mobile Robot and a GPR Antenna. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018; doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8593848.10.1109/IROS.2018.8593848 ↗
23. A review of Ground Penetrating Radar application in civil engineering: A 30-year journey from Locating and Testing to Imaging and Diagnosis10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.002 ↗
24. Application of ground penetrating radar in leakage detection of Concrete Face Rockfill Dam
25. Detection of road cavities in urban cities by 3D ground-penetrating radar10.1190/geo2020-0384.1 ↗
26. Ground Penetrating Radar in Dam Monitoring: The Test Case of Acerenza (Southern Italy)10.1155/2011/654194 ↗
27. Ground penetrating radar survey of the floor of the Accademia Gallery (Florence, Italy)10.3390/rs13071273 ↗
28. A Study on the Prediction of Buried Rebar Thickness Using CNN Based on GPR Heatmap Image Data
29. Noise performance comparison between continuous wave and stroboscopic pulse ground penetrating radar10.1109/LGRS.2017.2781458 ↗
30. Poomvises N., Kongsuk A., Pakdeerod P., Suklim T. Application of Ground Penetrating Radar and Hilbert transformation helps revealing anomalous body of leakage in a concrete structure; A case history at Huai Mae Tor, Tak province, Thailand. 2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 2018, 1–4; doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441528.10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441528 ↗
31. Applicability of GPR and a rebar detector to obtain rebar information of existing concrete structures
32. Search protocols for hidden forensic objects beneath floors and within walls10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.036 ↗
33. Schultz GM, Miller JS, Stamatescu L., Kingdon K., Keranen J. Applications of a Robotic Multi-sensor UXO Detection Platform. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2017, 2017; doi.org/10.4133/1.2924609.
34. Compressive stepped-frequency continuous-wave ground-penetrating radar10.1109/LGRS.2010.2045340 ↗
35. An assessment of in-field non-destructive testing methods for detection of internal defects in standing live trees
36. Tronca G., Tsalicoglou I., Lehner S., Catanzariti G. Comparison of pulsed and stepped frequency continuous wave (SFCW) GPR systems. 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 2018, doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441654.10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441654 ↗
37. Wiggenhauser H., Helmerich R., Krause M., Niederleithinger E., Taffe A., Wilsch G. Non-destructive testing of nuclear power plant concrete structures state of the art report. Submitted to Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2013.
38. Williams RM, Ray LE, Lever JH. Autonomous robotic ground penetrating radar surveys of ice sheets; Using machine learning to identify hidden crevasses. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques Proceedings, 2012; doi.org/10.1109/IST.2012.6295593.10.1109/IST.2012.6295593 ↗
39. GPR detection of several common subsurface voids inside dikes and dams10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.001 ↗
40. Analysis of imaging internal defects in living trees on irregular contours of tree trunks using ground-penetrating radar10.3390/f12081012 ↗
41. Soil water content estimation using high-frequency ground penetrating radar monitoring10.3390/w11051036 ↗
42. Study of wavelet entropy for airport pavement inspection using a multistatic ground-penetrating radar system10.1190/geo2020-0361.1 ↗
43. Geophysical evaluation of the inner structure of a historical earth-filled dam