A case study of the comparison between rubberized and polymer modified asphalt on heavy traffic pavement in wet and freeze environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Ground tire rubber (GTR) usage in asphalt pavement with the dry process has gained more prominence in recent times. The objective of this work is to investigate the pavement performance of GTR-modified asphalt pavement and polymer-modified asphalt pavement on heavy volume of traffic conditions in Michigan's wet and freeze environment. A suite of laboratory tests was done to evaluate the pavement performance of GTR-modified and polymer-modified asphalt mixtures. To reveal the strain and stress relationship under different frequencies and temperatures, the dynamic modulus test was applied. The Hamburg wheel tracking device (HWTD) was used to assess the high-temperature deformation resistance. The disc-shaped compact tension (DCT) test was used to evaluate the low-temperature cracking characteristics. The characteristics of the asphalt binder were assessed by the dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) for high-temperature properties and the asphalt binder cracking device (ABCD) for low-temperature properties. After the construction, a field noise test was conducted. The experimental results stated that the polymer-modified asphalt mixture and GTR-modified asphalt mixture showed higher dynamic modulus and better ability to prevent cracking than the conventional asphalt mixture at low temperatures, as well as better permanent deformation and stripping resistance than the conventional asphalt mixture. The fracture energy of the GTR-modified hot mix asphalt (HMA) is 13%-16% larger than the polymer-modified HMA. The number of passes to the stripping point of GTR-modified was 510%-518% higher than the conventional HMA. When compared to the field core, the lab-compacted HMA offers superior pavement performance. The extracted asphalt binder test results show the GTR-modified asphalt has better rutting resistance and cracking resistance than polymer-modified asphalt, and the results in the noise test demonstrated that the rubber-modified asphalt pavement mitigated the noise level by 2-3 dB on the road at different vehicle speeds. Moreover, the pavement condition was noticeably enhanced after the reconstruction of the surface course. The total number of passenger tires to be used in this project is about 2,270. To summarize, better rutting and cracking properties in asphalt pavement are shown by the project's utilization of rubber technology. And the GTR-modified HMA is comparable to polymer-modified HMA. Therefore, it may be appropriate to utilize rubber technology on high-traffic volume asphalt pavement in Michigan's wet and freeze climate.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Modification mechanism of asphalt binder with waste tire rubber and recycled polyethylene10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.014 ↗
2. Asphalt Mixture with Scrap Tire Rubber and Nylon Fiber from Waste Tires: Laboratory Performance and Preliminary ME Design Analysis10.3390/buildings12020160 ↗
3. Crumb rubber asphalt mixtures: A literature review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118577 ↗
4. Rubber-modified hot-mix asphalt pavement by dry process10.1080/10298430802169416 ↗
5. Use of reacted and activated rubber in ultra-thin hot mixture asphalt overlay for wet-freeze climates10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.364 ↗
6. Effects of crumb rubber content and curing time on the properties of asphalt concrete and stone mastic asphalt using dry process10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.09.014 ↗
7. Comparative analysis of the performance of asphalt concretes modified by dry way with polymeric waste10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.156 ↗
8. A complete laboratory assessment of crumb rubber porous asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.016 ↗
9. Environmental and mechanical performance of crumb rubber modified warm mix asphalt using Evotherm10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.168 ↗
10. Mechanical performance of dry process fine crumb rubber asphalt mixtures placed on the Portuguese road network10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.110 ↗
11. Agostinho Benta, and Luís Picado-Santos. "Asphalt rubber concrete fabricated by the dry process: Laboratory assessment of resistance against reflection cracking10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.081 ↗
12. Crumb rubber asphalt mixtures by dry process: Assessment after eight years of use on a low/medium trafficked pavement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.129 ↗
13. Evaluation of lab performance of stamp sand and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate waste composites without asphalt as road surface materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127569 ↗
14. Comparison of Rubber Asphalt with Polymer Asphalt under Long-Term Aging Conditions in Michigan10.3390/su141710987 ↗
15. Greene · 2014
16. Blazejowski, K., J. Olszacki, H. Peciakowski, Highly Modified Binders Orbiton HiMA, ORLEN Asfalt, Application Guide, Version 1e, Poland, 2015.
17. Evaluation of cracking performance for polymer-modified asphalt mixtures with high RAP content10.1080/14680629.2016.1266774 ↗
18. Fatigue cracking performance evaluation of laboratory-produced polymer modified asphalt mixture containing reclaimed asphalt pavement material10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.031 ↗
19. Waste cathode-ray-tube glass powder modified asphalt materials: Preparation and characterization10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127949 ↗
20. Cold in-place recycling asphalt mixtures: laboratory performance and preliminary ME design analysis10.3390/ma14082036 ↗
21. Standard test method for determining fracture energy of asphalt-aggregate mixtures using the disk-shaped compact tension geometry, West, Conshohocken, PA, 2013.