Innovative use of fly ash-finely powdered glass cullet as a nano additives for a sustainable concrete: Strength and microstructure and cost analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
As the global population and industrial and commercial activities continue to expand, the accompanying amount of industrial and solid waste increases constantly. The subject of utilizing and recycling solid wastes as building materials has recently drawn considerable interest from researchers from all over the world. The amount of waste glass produced each year has grown rapidly in the past several decades, and as a great source of active silica, finely powdered glass cullet (FPGC) is an alluring pozzolanic additive, making it a pozzolanic ingredient that can be included in concrete mixtures. These recycling initiatives for FPGC have the potential to reduce solid waste, greenhouse gas emissions, and raw waste of materials while providing sustainable benefits and offering an effective solution for a significant environmental challenge that necessitates the pursuit of radical solutions. This study aimed to investigate the properties and microstructure of high-proportion fly ash-based green concrete composite improved with FPGC and evaluate its environmental sustainability performance. A total of six mixtures containing 50 % fly ash as cement replacement and 0 %, 2 %, 4 %, 6 %, 8 %, and 10 % FPGC were developed. The limitation of this study is to examine the strength properties as well as to conduct a cost analysis. The workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and water absorption were tested. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to monitor the microstructural properties. Total energy consumption, total CO2 emission, and total costs were computed to determine the life cycle of the developed binders. Results revealed that workability slightly decreased with the increase in FPGC contents, whereas the strength properties increased with the increment in FPGC content up to 6 %. However, when the FPGC content exceeded 6%, the strength properties gradually decreased. The optimum contents were recorded at 50 % fly ash and 6 % FPGC. The resulting denser and homogeneous microstructures showed a positive effect on the reduction of total energy consumption, total CO2 emissions, and production costs of the synthesized binders. Therefore, the use of FPGC will enable the production of green concrete with satisfactory engineering characteristics and contribute to the achievement of sustainability goals of United Nations through pollution reduction, waste recycling, and landfill concerns. In addition, it would be incredibly beneficial to any country’s long-term growth since landfill waste disposal issues would be avoided and minimized. The major findings of this study are expected to lay the groundwork for future research and provide a better understanding of the behavior of multi-blend modified concrete made from waste in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly manner.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Lehne, F. Preston, Chatham house report making concrete change innovation in low-carbon cement and concrete #ConcreteChange, 2018. 〈www.chathamhouse.org〉.
2. Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: a critical review of the long-term durability properties10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857 ↗
3. Palm oil fuel ash-based eco-efficient concrete: a critical review of the short-term properties
4. Geopolymer mortars as sustainable repair material: a comprehensive review10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.076 ↗
5. Effect of nanomaterials inclusion on sustainability of cement-based concretes: a comprehensive review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124850 ↗
6. Acoustic properties of innovative concretes: a review10.3390/ma14020398 ↗
7. Sound-absorbing acoustic concretes: a review10.3390/su131910712 ↗
8. J. Watts, Concrete: the most destructive material on Earth, Guard. 25, 2019. 1–9.
9. Fly ash-based eco-efficient concretes: a comprehensive review of the short-term properties
10. Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete; a review10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119679 ↗
11. Performance of sustainable green concrete incorporated with fly ash, rice husk ash, and stone dust10.14311/AP.2021.61.0279 ↗
12. Durability of mortar and concrete containing alkali-activated binder with pozzolans: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.094 ↗
13. A sustainable reuse of agro-industrial wastes into green cement bricks10.3390/ma15051713 ↗
14. Improving the hardened properties of nonautoclaved silicate materials using nanodispersed mine waste10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003839 ↗
15. Technogenic fiber wastes for optimizing concrete10.3390/ma15145058 ↗
16. Properties and utilizations of waste tire rubber in concrete: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.108 ↗
17. Performance investigation of demolition wastes-based concrete composites
18. Demolition waste potential for completely cement-free binders10.3390/ma15176018 ↗
19. Bituminous mineral compositions for paving with cullet
20. Application of plastic wastes in construction materials: A review using the concept of life-cycle assessment in the context of recent research for future perspectives10.3390/ma14133549 ↗
21. Combined effects of fly ash and waste ferrochromium on properties of concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.026 ↗
22. New technology and application of brick making with coal fly ash10.1007/s10163-015-0368-9 ↗
23. Recycled coal bottom ash as sustainable materials for cement replacement in cementitious composites: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127624 ↗
24. A review on the utilization of fly ash10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003 ↗
25. Effects of waste dumpsites on geotechnical properties of the underlying soils in wet season10.4491/eer.2018.162 ↗
26. Impact of the landfill of ashes from the smelter on the soil environment: case study from the South Poland, Europe10.1007/s10653-019-00435-y ↗
27. Long-term leaching from MSWI air-pollution-control residues: leaching characterization and modeling10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.011 ↗
28. S. Kaza , L.C. Yao , P. Bhada-Tata , F. Van Woerden , What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1596/978–1-4648–1329-0.10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0 ↗
29. Carbon footprint of calcium sulfoaluminate clinker production10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.183 ↗
30. Green transition pathways for cement industry in China10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105355 ↗
31. Municipal waste management strategy review and waste-to-energy potentials in New Zealand10.3390/su10093114 ↗
32. World cement production and environmental implications10.1016/j.envdev.2014.02.005 ↗
33. New perspectives on recycling waste glass in manufacturing concrete for sustainable civil infrastructure10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119579 ↗
34. End-of-waste criteria for glass cullet: technical proposals
35. Recycling of glass: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions10.1177/0734242X09342148 ↗
36. Porous fly ash/aluminosilicate microspheres-based composites containing lightweight granules using liquid glass as binder10.3390/polym14173461 ↗
37. Fire resistance of geopolymer concrete: a critical review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126722 ↗
38. Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: a critical review of the long-term durability properties10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857 ↗
39. MSWI ashes as mineral additions in concrete10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.001 ↗
40. Landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in lake basins10.1007/s12517-020-06087-y ↗
41. Use of municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash in alkali activated slag cement
42. Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities10.1177/0734242X12437569 ↗
43. Assessment of the municipal solid waste management sector development in Jordan towards green growth by sustainability window analysis
44. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 207010.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848 ↗
45. Waste to energy–key element for sustainable waste management10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.003 ↗
46. Laboratory investigation of hot mix asphalt containing waste materials10.1080/14680629.2016.1189349 ↗
47. Optimisation of rubberised concrete with high rubber content: an experimental investigation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.054 ↗
48. Analytical framework for value added utilization of glass waste in concrete: mechanical and environmental performance10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.052 ↗
49. Combined use of waste concrete and glass as a replacement for mortar raw materials10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.041 ↗
50. W. Matthes , A. Vollpracht , Y. Villagrán , S. Kamali-Bernard , D. Hooton , E. Gruyaert , M. Soutsos , N. De Belie , Ground granulated blast-furnace slag, in: RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–70606-1_1.10.1007/978-3-319-70606-1_1 ↗
51. Progressive utilisation prospects of coal fly ash: a review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.337 ↗
52. Studies on mechanics of development of physical and mechanical properties of high-volume fly ash-cement pastes10.1016/0958-9465(90)90003-G ↗
53. Characterization of high-volume fly-ash cement pastes for sustainable construction applications10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.089 ↗
54. Performance of high volume fly ash concrete incorporating additives: a systematic literature review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120606 ↗
55. Prediction of compressive strength development for blended cement mortar considering fly ash fineness and replacement ratio10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121532 ↗
56. Effect of fineness and replacement ratio of ground fly ash on properties of blended cement mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.060 ↗
57. Role of particle fineness on engineering properties and microstructure of fly ash derived geopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117294 ↗
58. Properties of cement mortar in substitution with waste fine glass powder and environmental impact study
59. Elaboration of eco-efficient vegetable fibers reinforced cement-based composites using glass powder residue10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103599 ↗
60. Environmental impact assessment of pavement road bases with reuse and recycling strategies: A comparative study on geopolymer stabilized macadam and conventional alternatives10.1016/j.trd.2021.102749 ↗
61. Silica fume and waste glass in cement concrete production: a review
62. Strength, microstructure, efflorescence behavior and environmental impacts of waste glass geopolymers cured at ambient temperature10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119610 ↗
63. Alkali-activated slag supplemented with waste glass powder: laboratory characterization, thermodynamic modelling and sustainability analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125554 ↗
64. Cementless controlled low-strength material (CLSM) based on waste glass powder and hydrated lime: synthesis, characterization and thermodynamic simulation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122157 ↗
65. Influence of a fine glass powder on the durability characteristics of concrete and its comparison to fly ash10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.02.001 ↗
66. Utilization of waste glass powder in the production of cement and concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.016 ↗
67. C.A.Montenegro Neyra, Las Infecciones del Tracto Urinario Durante el Embarazo y su Relación con el Parto Pretérmino, Univ. Cesar Vallejo. 26 (2019) 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273–020-09706–3%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.09.008%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117919%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103116%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.004%0Ahttp://dx.doi.o.10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.004 ↗
68. Mix design and pollution control potential of pervious concrete with non-compliant waste fly ash10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.014 ↗
69. A review on pavement porous concrete using recycled waste materials
70. Advanced progress in recycling municipal and construction solid wastes for manufacturing geopolymer composites
71. Quantifying CO2 emissions from China’s cement industry10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.031 ↗
72. USGS, Cement Statistics and Information, U.S. Geol. Surv. 53 (2020) 1689–1699. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/cement-statistics-and-information.
73. Recycled waste glass powder as a partial replacement of cement in concrete containing silica fume and fly ash
74. Effect of glass powder on microstructure of cement pastes10.1680/adcr.13.00100 ↗
75. Pozzolanic reaction of glass powder and its role in controlling alkali-silica reaction10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.12.008 ↗
76. An investigation into the hydration and microstructure of cement pastes modified with glass powders10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.085 ↗
77. Durability of mortar using waste glass powder as cement replacement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.027 ↗
78. Influence of different particle sizes on reactivity of finely ground glass as supplementary cementitious material (SCM)10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.004 ↗
79. Effect of glass powder on sulfuric acid resistance of cementitious materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.049 ↗
80. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete
81. Waste glass powder as partial replacement of cement for sustainable concrete practice10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.10.005 ↗
82. Pozzolanic properties of fine and coarse color-mixed glass cullet10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.013 ↗
83. Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: a field trial on concrete slabs10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.012 ↗
84. Properties of concrete contains mixed colour waste recycled glass as sand and cement replacement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.019 ↗
85. Performance evaluation of concrete incorporating glass powder and glass sludge wastes as supplementary cementing material10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.133 ↗
86. Value-added utilisation of waste glass in concrete10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00251-5 ↗
87. Practical recycling applications of crushed waste glass in construction materials: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.005 ↗
88. Use of fine glass as ASR inhibitor in glass aggregate mortars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.030 ↗
89. A. C150, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, ASTM International, in: ASTM West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
90. A. Standard, C33,“Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, vol. i, no, 2003.
91. British Standards Institution, BS 8500–2:2006 Concrete - Complementary British Standard to BS EN 206–1 Part 2: Specification for constituent materials and concrete, Br. Stand. 2019. 1–52.
92. A. Standard, C143, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Stand. Test Method Slump Hydraul. Concr. 2015.
93. A.S. for T. and M.C.C.–1 on Cement, Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens), ASTM International, 2013.
94. A review on carbon emissions in Malaysian cement industry
95. The concise guide to cement manufacture
96. Ecological, fresh state and long-term mechanical properties of high-volume fly ash high-performance self-compacting concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.074 ↗
97. Effect of the addition of nano glass powder on the compressive strength of high volume fly ash modified concrete
98. Alkali-activated mortars blended with glass bottle waste nano powder: environmental benefit and sustainability10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118636 ↗
99. Feasibility study on concrete performance made by partial replacement of cement with nanoglass powder and fly ash10.1007/s40999-018-0352-6 ↗
100. Development of ecological strain-hardening cementitious composites incorporating high-volume ground-glass pozzolans10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117740 ↗