The carbon footprint of normal and high-strength concrete used in low-rise and high-rise buildings
Source abstract
Abstract
To reduce the mass of CO2 released into atmosphere by the construction industry, the performance strategy can be adopted. It is based on the use of High-Strength Concrete (HSC) in alternative to Normal-Strength Concrete (NSC). Such concretes are herein considered to design the reinforced concrete structures of three buildings, having 14, 30 and 60 floors, respectively. For each building, the structural analyses, carried out for four classes of concrete (i.e., C25, C40, C60 and C80) in accordance with Eurocode 2, provides different dimensions of the structural elements. In other words, the amount of CO2, released in the atmosphere due to the production of the structural materials, is a function of both concrete strength and height of the building. As a result, the minimum impact of low-rise buildings occurs when the structural elements are made with NSC. Conversely, only when HSC is used to cast the structural elements of tall buildings, can the carbon footprint be effectively reduced.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. A review on emission analysis in cement industries10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014 ↗
2. Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009 ↗
3. Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions - Management options and abatement cost10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055 ↗
4. Analysis on differences of carbon dioxide emission from cement production and their major determinants10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.026 ↗
5. A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.006 ↗
6. Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001 ↗
7. Material nature versus structural nurture: the embodied carbon of fundamental structural elements10.1021/es202190r ↗
8. Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 205010.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.026 ↗
9. An Empathetic Added Sustainability Index (EASI) for cementitious based construction materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.160 ↗
10. 2004
11. Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on reduction of CO2 emissions from concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.018 ↗
12. A comprehensive approach to mitigation of embodied carbon in reinforced concrete buildings10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.035 ↗
13. Comparative sustainability assessment of binary blended concretes using Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.010 ↗
14. The carbon footprint of buildings: a review of methodologies and applications10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.012 ↗
15. Parametric modelling and evolutionary optimization for cost-optimal and low-carbon design of high-rise reinforced concrete buildings
16. A recycled aggregate concrete high-rise building: structural performance and embodied carbon footprint10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.210 ↗
17. BSI EN 15804 · 2014
18. European Committee for Standardization · 2011
19. Costruire legami per la comunità
20. 2012
21. Taranath · 2010
22. Dimensionamento c.a.