journal article·2024-12Open access

Evaluating environmental and economic benefits of using biochar in concrete: A life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making framework

Khadiga M. Mekky, Mona G. Ibrahim, Kamal Sharobim, Manabu Fujii, Mahmoud Nasr

Abstract

While several studies have assessed the applicability of using biochar in cement mortar and concrete preparation based on the best mechanical properties, this evaluation method should be improved to consider the techno-economic feasibility and the environmental impacts. To address this research gap, this study attempts to compare between the conventional concrete with 100% cement as a control mixture (CM) and dumping of sludge into open sites (scenario_1), and biochar concrete using alum sludge biochar (ASB) as a partial cement replacement (scenario_2), regarding the project life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic feasibility. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework was used to assign scores to the environmental LCA criteria, material functional performance tests, and cost considerations. The two scenarios were arranged in SimaPro LCA software, and then the different criteria were analyzed using the TOPSIS technique to choose the best alternative. The study demonstrated that the functional properties of the cement mixture containing 5% of ASB were almost comparable to those of CM, owing to the presence of significant amounts of quartz (SiO2) that bonded strongly with cement molecules. This ASB mixture also enjoyed the least environmental impacts, reducing the global warming potential (GWP) by 32.2% compared with the CM scenario. The scores of the “Cost” criterion, considering the price of raw materials, energy, production, and maintenance, for the two alternatives were almost comparable, depicting that scenario_2 achieved the highest closeness coefficient of 0.95 in the MCDM overall scoring. This study concluded that biochar could be incorporated into cementitious mixtures due to its lower impact on global warming to maintain a sustainable and economic concrete industrial strategy. Future studies should focus on studying the long-term durability of the biochar-based concrete mixtures and integrating into the MCDM strategy; in addition, determining the correlation between sustainable construction implementation and sustainable development goals achieved.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 1658/2006, E (2006). Egyptian Standard Specification. Testing of Concrete.
2. ACI. (1997). American Concrete Institute Committee 211, Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete [211.1-91: Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete (Reapproved 2009)]. American Concrete Institute.
3. Characterization of water treatment sludge and its reuse as coagulant10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.010 ↗
4. Ahmed, M., B., Zhou, J., L, Ngo, H., H., & Guo, W. (201). Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 84, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.1011.1002.10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.002 ↗
5. Arukala · 2020 · 159
6. ASTM. (2017). ASTM C494-17. Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concret, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7. ASTM, C., & PA · 2003
8. BS EN 934 part 2: 2001 Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout. Concrete admixtures. Definitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling
9. Life cycle assessment of biochar as a partial replacement to Portland cement
10. A comparative life cycle assessment for sustainable cement production in Turkey10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109362 ↗
11. Potential of greenhouse gas emissions from sewage sludge management: a case study of Taiwan10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.084 ↗
12. Sustainable production of concrete with treated alum sludg10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122703 ↗
13. FTIR study of the effect of temperature and nanosilica on the nano structure of C–S–H gel formed by hydrating tricalcium silicate10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.056 ↗
14. Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal heavyweight, and mass concrete (ACI 211.1-91) reapproved 1997
15. Testing fresh concrete
16. Life cycle assessment of the use of alternative fuels in cement kilns: a case study10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.017 ↗
17. Assessment tools for the environmental evaluation of concrete, plaster and brick elements production10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.006 ↗
18. Progress in manufacture and properties of construction materials incorporating water treatment sludge: a review10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.032 ↗
19. Recycling of raw water treatment sludge in cementitious composites: effects on heat evolution, compressive strength and microstructure
20. Water treatment sludge conversion to biochar as cementitious material in cement composite
21. Factors determining the potential of biochar as a carbon capturing and sequestering construction material: critical review10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001924 ↗
22. Cement production technology improvement compared to factor 4 objectives10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.031 ↗
23. The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.005 ↗
24. Environmental assessment of sewage sludge as secondary raw material in cement production–a case study in China10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.020 ↗
25. The use of AHP method for selection of supplier10.3846/16484142.2014.930928 ↗
26. Impacts alum DWTPs sludge discharge and changes in flow regime of the Nile River on the quality of surface water and cultivated soils in Fayoum watershed, Egypt10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144333 ↗
27. Recycled waste glass powder as a partial replacement of cement in concrete containing silica fume and fly ash.
28. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment; Requirements and Guidelines
29. A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013 ↗
30. Waste glass sludge as a partial cement replacement in mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.007 ↗
31. IR spectroscopy studies of zeolites in geopolymeric materials derived from kaolinite10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.02.027 ↗
32. Influence of chemical synthesis process on the properties of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.282 ↗
33. A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.052 ↗
34. Pyrolytic valorization of water treatment residuals containing powdered activated carbon as multifunctional adsorbents10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126641 ↗
35. Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights10.1007/s10661-012-2723-9 ↗
36. Performance of cement pastes containing sewage sludge ash at elevated temperatures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.290 ↗
37. Elucidating dominant factors of PO43–, Cd2+ and nitrobenzene removal by biochar: A comparative investigation based on distinguishable biochars10.1016/j.cclet.2019.04.016 ↗
38. Influence of new organic alkali activators on microstructure and strength of fly ash geopolymer10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.109 ↗
39. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete prepared with sustainable cement-based materials
40. Environmental evaluation of concrete with sewage sludge ash based on LCA10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.003 ↗
41. Neville · 1995 · Vol. 4 · 1995
42. An investigation into the pyrolysis and oxidation of bio-oil from sugarcane bagasse: Kinetics and evolved gases using TGA-FTIR10.1016/j.jece.2021.106144 ↗
43. Influence of thermally activated alum sludge ash on the engineering properties of multiple-blended binders concretes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.014 ↗
44. Durability properties of multiple-blended binder concretes incorporating thermally activated alum sludge ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.149 ↗
45. Impact of the selection of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of green concrete10.1007/s11367-017-1284-0 ↗
46. Utilization of waste polysilicon sludge in concrete10.3390/ma13010251 ↗
47. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process10.1287/inte.24.6.19 ↗
48. (2018). Effect of alkali dosage and silicate modulus on carbonation of alkali-activated slag mortars10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.07.005 ↗
49. Towards closed-loop concrete recycling: life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis
50. Life cycle assessment of the production of cement: a Brazilian case study10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.050 ↗
51. Accounting for land use in life cycle assessment: the value of NPP as a proxy indicator to assess land use impacts on ecosystems10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.055 ↗
52. Characterization and pozzolanic properties of calcined alum sludge10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.10.042 ↗
53. Effect of rock properties on the Los Angeles abrasion and impact test characteristics of the aggregates10.1016/j.matchar.2009.10.014 ↗
54. Feasibility of brackish water and landfill leachate treatment by GO/MoS2-PVA composite membranes
55. Can the compressive strength of concrete be estimated from knowledge of the mixture proportions?: new insights from statistical analysis and machine learning methods10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.006 ↗
56. Environmental and economic impacts assessment of concrete pavement brick and permeable brick production process-a case study in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.037 ↗