journal article·2024-07Open access

Geopolymer synthesis and performance paving the way for greener building material: A comprehensive study

Mouhamadou Amar, Bhargav Ladduri, Ali Alloul, Mahfoud Benzerzour, Nor-Edine Abriak

Abstract

Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) is renowned for its robustness and endurance in construction, but its manufacturing process incurs substantial energy consumption and leads to significant carbon dioxide emissions. Geopolymers (GP), conversely, represent a synthetic material derived from industrial by-products like calcined materials and slag. This study employs a diverse array of techniques to optimize the formulation of geopolymers and to evaluate their initial state (slump, reactivity) and mechanical characteristics (mechanical strength, density). Materials used are a combination of metakaolin (MK), granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), and potassium silicate (K2SiO3) as an alkaline reagent (AR). The findings indicate that geopolymers exhibit strength akin to that of Portland cement (even better at early ages, between +16% to +88% higher), thereby positioning it as a credible substitute. The examination of the microstructure through methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) reveals that the synthesized material possesses a stable interconnected polymeric 3D-structure. Furthermore, mercury porosity analysis demonstrates the presence of finer pores (nanometric) consistent with a densely packed and closely-knit micelle structure. This study demonstrates that geopolymers blend comprising calcined earth, metakaolin, and slag holds promise as a viable alternative to OPC.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Geotechnical and construction materials studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (96)

Show source-provided references
1. Conferences | Environment and sustainable development | United Nations, (n.d.). https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment (accessed September 9, 2023).
2. K. Pławecka, P. Bazan, W.T. Lin, K. Korniejenko, M. Sitarz, M. Nykiel, Development of Geopolymers Based on Fly Ashes from Different Combustion Processes, Polymers 2022, Vol. 14, Page 1954 14 (2022) 1954. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14101954.10.3390/polym14101954 ↗
3. Environmental impact of cement production and solutions: a review10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.212 ↗
4. Environmental and exergetic impacts of cement production: a case study10.1002/ep.12894 ↗
5. Comparison indices for design and proportioning of concrete mixtures taking environmental impacts into account10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.002 ↗
6. Y.L.M. Vergara, V.M. John, Global Concrete Water Footprint, 2019 7th International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC) (2019) 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/IESTEC46403.2019.00-77.10.1109/IESTEC46403.2019.00-77 ↗
7. Geopolymer cement to minimize carbon-dioxde greenhouse-warming
8. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: an overview10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455 ↗
9. P. Palmero, A. Formia, T.J.-M., P. Antonaci, Processing and applications of geopolymers as sustainable alternative to traditional cement, (2014).
10. Determination of the reactive component of fly ashes for geopolymer production using XRF and XRD10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.031 ↗
11. Durability performance of geopolymer concrete: a review
12. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 ↗
13. Durability of geopolymers and geopolymer concretes: a review10.1515/rams-2021-0002 ↗
14. Fly ash-based geopolymer composites: a review of the compressive strength and microstructure analysis10.3390/ma15207098 ↗
15. A critical review of geopolymer properties for structural fire-resistance applications10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.076 ↗
16. Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111 ↗
17. CO2 treatment of ground granulated blast furnace slag for enhancing geopolymer properties10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.161 ↗
18. Composition and technological properties of geopolymers based on metakaolin and red mud10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.058 ↗
19. Geopolymer synthesis using low-grade clays10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121066 ↗
20. B.B. Jindal, T. Alomayri, A. Hasan, C.R. Kaze, Geopolymer concrete with metakaolin for sustainability: a comprehensive review on raw material’s properties, synthesis, performance, and potential application, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021 30:10 30 (2022) 25299–25324. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-17849-W.10.1007/s11356-021-17849-w ↗
21. Geopolymer concrete as green building materials: recent applications, sustainable development and circular economy potentials10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155577 ↗
22. Potential of geopolymer technology towards green buildings and sustainable cities10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2108 ↗
23. H. Castillo, H. Collado, T. Droguett, nchez, M. Vesely, P. Garrido, S. Palma, Factors Affecting the Compressive Strength of Geopolymers: A Review, (2021).10.3390/min11121317 ↗
24. E. McNulty, Geopolymers: An Environmental Alternative to Carbon Dioxide Producing Ordinary Portland Cement, (2009).
25. Durability performance of geopolymer concrete: a review
26. Exploration of the mechanical properties, durability and application of geopolymers: a review
27. An overview of geopolymers derived from industrial by-products10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.136 ↗
28. Properties of fresh and hardened fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete: a review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122389 ↗
29. B. Cai, T. Mellgren, S. Bredenberg, H. Engqvist, The effect of curing conditions on compression strength and porosity of metakaolin-based geopolymers, (2013) 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118807743.CH5.10.1002/9781118807743.ch5 ↗
30. Conversion of local industrial wastes into greener cement through geopolymer technology: a case study of high-magnesium nickel slag10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.147 ↗
31. Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete10.1680/macr.2011.63.10.763 ↗
32. A review on microstructural study and compressive strength of geopolymer mortar, paste and concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.075 ↗
33. Permeability indices and corrosion resistance of geopolymer and Portland cement concretes10.1680/jmacr.17.00151 ↗
34. Mechanical and thermal properties of fly ash based geopolymers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.023 ↗
35. Ecofriendly geopolymer concrete: a comprehensive review10.1007/s10098-021-02085-0 ↗
36. Building a sustainable future: an experimental study on recycled brick waste powder in engineered geopolymer composites
37. Investigation of waste clay brick as partial replacement in geopolymer binder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130107 ↗
38. Influence of partial substitution of metakaolin by palm oil fuel ash and alumina waste ash on compressive strength and microstructure in metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar
39. The effect of mixing molar ratios and sand particles on microstructure and mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122223 ↗
40. Geopolymerization reaction, microstructure and simulation of metakaolin-based geopolymers at extended Si/Al ratios10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.014 ↗
41. Utilization of volcanic ashes for geopolymer based on alkaline activator and solid-liquid ratio10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012058 ↗
42. Comparative study on geopolymer binders based on two alkaline solutions (NaOH and KOH)
43. Concentration of NaOH and the effect on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.568 ↗
44. Effects of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution concentration on fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer10.1063/1.5002205 ↗
45. Comparative study on geopolymer binders based on two alkaline solutions (NaOH and KOH)
46. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060 ↗
47. J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. 5-th edition, Institut Géopolymère, 2020.
48. Preparation and properties of rubberised geopolymer concrete: a review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125504 ↗
49. Ultra-high-performance concrete: constituents, mechanical properties, applications and current challenges
50. Effect of vibratory mixing on the slump, compressive strength, and density of concrete with the different mix proportions10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.033 ↗
51. Effects of mixing duration on engineering properties of geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124449 ↗
52. Calorimetric study of geopolymer binders based on natural pozzolan10.1007/s10973-016-5850-7 ↗
53. Internal heat liberation and strength development of self-cured geopolymers in ambient curing conditions10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.197 ↗
54. Effect of Na/Al on formation, structures and properties of metakaolin based Na-geopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.171 ↗
55. R. Mohamed, R.A. Razak, M. Mustafa, A.B. Abdullah, R.K. Shuib, A. Mohd Mortar, W. Wazien, A. Zailani, Investigation of Heat Released during Geopolymerization with Fly Ash based Geopolymer, (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012093.10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012093 ↗
56. Geopolymer prepared with high-magnesium nickel slag: Characterization of properties and microstructure10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.038 ↗
57. Geopolymerization behavior of ferrochrome slag and fly ash blends10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.070 ↗
58. Effects of slag content on the residual mechanical properties of ambient air-cured geopolymers exposed to elevated temperatures10.1080/21870764.2018.1529013 ↗
59. Optimization of slag content and properties improvement of metakaolin-slag geopolymer mixes10.2174/1874088X01812010040 ↗
60. Optimum mix design of geopolymer pastes and concretes cured in ambient condition based on compressive strength, setting time and workability10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.006 ↗
61. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 ↗
62. Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer10.1007/s10853-009-3934-5 ↗
63. Factors affecting the suitability of fly ash as source material for geopolymers10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.012 ↗
64. Influence of the slag content on the chloride and sulfuric acid resistances of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.004 ↗
65. H.U. Ahmed, A.S. Mohammed, S.M.A. Qaidi, R.H. Faraj, N. Hamah Sor, A.A. Mohammed, Compressive strength of geopolymer concrete composites: a systematic comprehensive review, analysis and modeling, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2022.2083022.10.1080/19648189.2022.2083022 ↗
66. W.M. Kriven, J.L. Bell, M. Gordon, Microstructure and {Nanoporosity} of as-{Set} {Geopolymers}, in: Mechanical {Properties} and {Performance} of {Engineering} {Ceramics} {II}: Ceramic {Engineering} and {Science} {Proceedings}, {Volume} 27, {Issue} 2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., n.d.: pp. 491–503.10.1002/9780470291313.ch47 ↗
67. Contributions to the study of porosity in fly ash-based geopolymers. Relationship between degree of reaction, porosity and compressive strength
68. Porous arrangement and transport properties of geopolymers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.028 ↗
69. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of cements
70. Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers10.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6 ↗
71. J.S.J. Van Deventer, Physical evolution of Na-geopolymer derived from metakaolin up to 1000 °c10.1007/s10853-006-0535-4 ↗
72. Fly ash–GGBS geopolymer in boron environment: a study on rheology and microstructure by ATR FT-IR and MAS NMR10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120965 ↗
73. P. Duxson, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, F. Separovic, J.S.J. Van Deventer, Si NMR Study of Structural Ordering in Aluminosilicate Geopolymer Gels, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/la047336x.10.1021/la047336x ↗
74. Geopolymer mortar with flash-calcined sediments cured under ambient conditions10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131809 ↗
75. A comprehensive study on the compressive strength, durability-related parameters and microstructure of geopolymer mortars based on mixed construction and demolition waste10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136522 ↗
76. Micro)-structural comparison between geopolymers, alkali-activated slag cement and Portland cement10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.12.021 ↗
77. Longitudinal single-sided NMR study: silica-to-alumina ratio changes the reaction mechanism of geopolymer10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106921 ↗
78. J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. 5-th edition, Institut Géopolymère, 2020.
79. Three different Fourier-transform mid-infrared sampling techniques to characterize bio-organic samples10.1002/jeq2.20106 ↗
80. J. Tao, FTIR and Raman Studies of Structure and Bonding in Mineral and Organic–Mineral Composites, Methods Enzymol 532 (2013) 533–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416617-2.00022-9.10.1016/B978-0-12-416617-2.00022-9 ↗
81. Vibrational spectra of monoisotopic SiH 4 and GeH 4 in low-temperature matrices
82. FT-IR study of early stages of alkali activated materials based on pyroclastic deposits (Mt. Etna, Sicily, Italy) using two different alkaline solutions10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120095 ↗
83. FT-IR study, thermal analysis, and evaluation of the antibacterial activity of a MK-geopolymer mortar using glass waste as fine aggregate10.3390/polym13172970 ↗
84. The PONKCS method applied for time resolved XRD quantification of supplementary cementitious material reactivity in hydrating mixtures with ordinary Portland cement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.157 ↗
85. C.A. Rosas-Casarez, S. Rea, J. Soberón, J.L. Sánchez, R.C. Higuera, M.C. Chinchillas, O.H.A. Agüero, Experimental study of XRD, FTIR and TGA techniques in geopolymeric materials, (2014).
86. Investigation of microstructure and thermomechanical properties of nano-TiO2 admixed geopolymer for thermal resistance applications10.1007/s11665-021-05708-1 ↗
87. Effect of curing on mechanical strength and microstructure of fly ash blend GGBS geopolymer, Portland cement mortar and its behavior at elevated temperature10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.087 ↗
88. Studi mikrostruktur beton ringan geopolimer dengan scanning electron microscope (SEM) dan X-ray diffraction (XRD)10.31851/deformasi.v7i2.9387 ↗
89. C.A. Rees, G.C. Lukey, J.V. Deventer, Characteristics of geopolymers derived from flyash and solid- silicate wastes, (2004).
90. A. Nikolov, А Николов, Physical properties and powder XRD characterization of coal fly ash-based geopolymer heated up to 1150 °C Физични свойства и прахова рентгенографска характеристика на получени от въглищна летяща пепел геополимери, нагрeти до 1150 °C, (2019).
91. R. Jeyalakshmi, B. Raj, International Conference on Energy, Water and Environmental Science & Technology, (2015).
92. Effect of silica/alumina ratio and structure-directing agent on the physical and chemical properties of SAPO-3410.1007/s10971-021-05669-w ↗
93. In-situ small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) – a versatile tool for clarifying the evolution of microporosity in polymer-derived ceramics10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111268 ↗
94. Thermally activated Al(OH)3 part II—effect of different thermal treatments10.3390/ceramics4040040 ↗
95. Synthetic aluminosilicates for geopolymer production10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0508 ↗
96. Reaction mechanisms of alkali-activated materials