Melt Electrospinning Writing of Mesh Implants for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
Source abstract
Abstract
Over the past decade, melt electrospinning writing has attracted renewed attention. When combined with three-dimensional (3D) printing capabilities, complex 3D structures can be produced, from ultrafine fibers in the absence of toxic solvents, making it particularly attractive to fabricate customized scaffolds and implants for medical applications. This research aimed to develop novel less stiff vaginal mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, matching the physiological biomechanics of vaginal tissues. The main objectives, to attain that goal, were: development of a melt electrospinning writing prototype, with additive manufacturing capability, to produce complex structures from micrometer scale fibers, in a direct 3D printing mode; and design and validate new concepts of biodegradable meshes/scaffolds with new geometries, for POP repair. The melt electrospinning writing prototype was built based on different modules. Biodegradable polycaprolactone was used to produce novel implants: three geometries and two fiber configurations were employed. The commercially available Restorelle ® (Coloplast) mesh was used as a benchmark. Printed implants were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and uniaxial tensile testing. The SEM images showed that the geometry is generally well produced; however, some minor deviations are visible due to charge interactions. The tensile test results indicated that, regardless of the geometry, the samples showed an elastic behavior for smaller displacements; aplastic behavior dominates later stages. In the physiological range of deformation, the novel meshes (80 μm fiber diameter) matched the tissue properties ( p > 0.05). The Restorelle mesh was significantly stiffer than vaginal tissue ( p < 0.05) and novel meshes. The precision of the various geometrical patterns and fiber diameters produced highlights the success of the designed and built prototype equipment. Results showed that the biodegradable meshes produced are biomechanically more compatible with native tissue than commercial implants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pelvic floor disorders treatments · Hernia repair and management · Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mechanical Department, LAETA, INEGI, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.01.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.01.001 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20190466410.1002/adfm.201904664 ↗
3. Wunner FM, , Florczak S, , Mieszczanek P, et al. Electrospinning with polymer melts—State of the art and future perspectives. Compr Biomater II, 2017; 5:217–235.
4. Ruijter M, , Ribeiro A, , Dokter I, et al. Simultaneous micropatterning of fibrous meshes and bioinks for the fabrication of living tissue constructs. Adv Healthcare Mater, 2019; 8:80–88.
5. 10.1067/mob.2002.12381910.1067/mob.2002.123819 ↗
6. 10.1097/AOG.000000000000028610.1097/AOG.0000000000000286 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.00410.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.004 ↗
8. Maher C, , Feiner B, , Baessler K, et al. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016; 2:CD012079.
9. 10.1007/s00192-011-1384-510.1007/s00192-011-1384-5 ↗
10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-andprosthetics/. Accessed December13 2020.
11. RegenHU Biosystems Architects. 3D Bioprinters. https://www.regenhu.com/3d-bioprinters/. Accessed December13 2020.
12. Spraybase®. Melt Electrospinning. https://www.spraybase.com/meltelectrospin/. Accessed December13 2020.
13. Axolotl Biosystems Ltd. AxoDual X. https://www.axolotlbio.com/dual-x/. Accessed December13 2020.
14. NovaSpider. Technology—NovaSpider: Advanced manufacturing tools. http://novaspider.com/technology/. Accessed December13 2020.
15. Li L LaBarbera D. 3D high-content screening of organoids for drug discovery. Compr Med Chem 2017:388–415. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124095472123297 (last accessed on 15 August 2021).10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.12329-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.00310.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03018.x10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03018.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jss.2006.05.02210.1016/j.jss.2006.05.022 ↗
19. Rynkevic R. In vivo models and in silico simulations of mesh augmented prolapse. PhD Thesis KU Leuven 2019.
20. 10.1089/3dp.2017.014910.1089/3dp.2017.0149 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20110348210.1002/adma.201103482 ↗
22. 10.1515/bnm-2015-002210.1515/bnm-2015-0022 ↗
23. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/03500210.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10978510.1016/j.msec.2019.109785 ↗
25. 10.1088/0960-1317/26/2/02501510.1088/0960-1317/26/2/025015 ↗
26. 10.1088/1361-6439/aa4fd910.1088/1361-6439/aa4fd9 ↗
27. 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.034710.1089/ten.teb.2014.0347 ↗
28. Persano L, , Camposeo A, , Tekmen C, et al. Industrial upscaling of electrospinning and applications of polymer nanofibers: A review. Spec Issue Funct Nanofibers, 2013; 298:504–520.
29. Barhoum A Bechelany M Makhlouf AH. Handbook of Nanofibers. Advances in Melt Electrospinning Technique. Springer Nature 2017.
30. 10.1097/GCO.000000000000031310.1097/GCO.0000000000000313 ↗