journal article·2024-07Open access

Performance evaluation of ternary blended geopolymer binders comprising of slag, fly ash and brick kiln rice husk ash

SaiKrishna Chelluri, Nabil Hossiney

Abstract

The use of industrial and agro-based precursor materials from local sources can achieve desirable properties for geopolymer binders, and thus realize the carbon-efficient sustainable materials in the construction industry. At the same time, the synergy between these precursors can be assessed using the multilevel material investigation, which has not been explored extensively. Moreover, there are limited studies on ternary geopolymer synthesized with rice husk ash from uncontrolled burning source such as brick kilns. Therefore, this study evaluates the performance of ternary blended geopolymer binders comprised of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash (FLA), and brick kiln rice husk ask (BRHA), implementing the multilevel material approach. The experimental program includes assessment and comparative analyses of the properties of geopolymer binders such as setting time, flow, compressive strength, density, water absorption, and efflorescence. Additionally, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses examine crystallographic structure and microscopic morphology of the composite binders. The initial setting time ranged from 21 min to 47 min for ternary mixes, in comparison to 21 min to 58 min for binary mixes. GGBFS significantly contribute in setting of binder due to hydration reaction and formation of C-S-H gel. The flow of ternary mixes exhibits standard deviation of 11.42 mm when compared to 20.96 mm of binary mixes. Lower dispersion in flow values suggests improved coaction between GGBFS, FLA, and BRHA. The compressive strength of ternary mixes improved when compared to the binary mixes. The optimum performance of 60 MPa was obtained for G60A40F95R5, which was 25% and 66.67% higher than binary mixes G60F40 and G60R40, respectively. Similarly, ternary mix G70A30F95R5 showed the least water absorption of 2.08% which was 53% and 58.4% lower than the binary mixes G70F30 and G70R30, respectively. The improvement in the properties of ternary mixes was confirmed from XRD analysis, which reveal coexistence of C-S-H along with crystalline SiO2 that positively improve the microstructure of the composite binder. Moreover, SEM analysis showed dense microstructure for ternary mixes when compared to binary mixes, which further validate the improvement in the strength of such binders. The sustainability analysis discloses the enhanced performance of ternary mixes, wherein, G60A40F95R5 showed 19.35% and 46.23% lower carbon dioxide parameter than binary mixes G60F40 and G60R40, respectively. All in all, the multilevel material investigation provides a great avenue to delve in to the best performing ternary mixes which will find desirable applications in construction industry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Global cement market share, growth, analysis, forecast. Accessed at 〈https://www.expertmarketresearch.com/pressrelease/global-cement-market〉.
2. Green construction for low-carbon cities: A review10.1007/s10311-022-01544-4 ↗
3. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: A review10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 ↗
4. An overview of geopolymers derived from industrial by-products10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.136 ↗
5. Evaluation on the Mechanical Properties of Ground Granulated Blast Slag (GGBS) and Fly Ash Stabilized Soil via Geopolymer Process10.3390/ma14112833 ↗
6. Utilization of waste rice husk ash for sustainable geopolymer: A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125218 ↗
7. Utilisation of rice husk ash for cleaner production of different construction products10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121578 ↗
8. World Rice Production 2022/2023. Accessed at 〈http://www.worldagriculturalproduction.com/crops/rice.aspx〉.
9. Annual report 2022–2023, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, accessed at 〈https://agricoop.gov.in/Documents/annual_report_english_2022_23.pdf〉.
10. State-of-the-art-review on rice husk ash: A supplementary cementitious material in concrete
11. Production, characteristics, and utilization of rice husk ash in alkali-activated materials: An overview of fresh and hardened state properties10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128341 ↗
12. Systematic Review on Alkali-Activated Binders Blended with Rice Husk Ash10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003825 ↗
13. Engineering and Microstructural Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Rice Husk–Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002379 ↗
14. Performance and microstructure characteristics of the fly ash and residual rice husk ash-based geopolymers prepared at various solid-to-liquid ratios and curing temperatures10.1002/ep.12445 ↗
15. Influence of rice husk ash on mechanical properties and fire resistance of recycled aggregate high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119797 ↗
16. Sustainable geopolymer concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash: Strength and permeability properties10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.313 ↗
17. Partial replacement of metakaolin with thermally treated rice husk ash in metakaolin-based geopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.112 ↗
18. Experimental study on geopolymer concrete prepared using high-silica RHA incorporating alccofine
19. Synthesis and characterization of red mud and rice husk ash-based geopolymer composites10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.010 ↗
20. Microstructure and engineering properties of Fe2O3 (FeO)-Al2O3-SiO2 based geopolymer composites10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.171 ↗
21. A sludge and modified rice husk ash-based geopolymer: Synthesis and characterization analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.045 ↗
22. Enhanced properties of high-silica rice husk ash-based geopolymer paste by incorporating basalt fibers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118422 ↗
23. Effects of ultra fine slag as mineral admixture on the compressive strength, water absorption and permeability of rice husk ash based geopolymer concrete
24. Experimental and microstructural assessment of ternary blended geopolymer concrete with different Na2SiO3-to-NaOH volume ratios10.1007/s41062-020-0279-z ↗
25. Development of geopolymer cement concrete for highway infrastructure applications
26. Flexural Behaviour of Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Ternary Blend Geopolymer Concrete Beams10.3390/su14105954 ↗
27. Potential utilization of waste glass powder as a precursor material in synthesizing ecofriendly ternary blended geopolymer matrix
28. The strength oriented mix design for geopolymer concrete using Taguchi method and Indian concrete mix design code10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120853 ↗
29. Effect of Hybrid Fibres on the Durability Characteristics of Ternary Blend Geopolymer Concrete10.3390/jcs5100279 ↗
30. Ecofriendly geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review10.1007/s10098-021-02085-0 ↗
31. Characterization of waste clay brick powder and its effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymer mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134848 ↗
32. Effects of GBFS content and curing methods on the working performance and microstructure of ternary geopolymers based on high-content steel slag10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134128 ↗
33. Influence of Source Materials and the Role of Oxide Composition on the Performance of Ternary Blended Sustainable Geopolymer Mortar10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.178 ↗
34. Ternary alkali aluminosilicate cement based on rice husk ash, slag and coal fly ash10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.020 ↗
35. Sustainable utilization of ultrafine rice husk ash in alkali activated concrete: Characterization and performance evaluation
36. Characterization and utilization of rice husk ash (RHA) in fly ash–Blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete for sustainable future10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.870 ↗
37. 2019
38. Engineering properties and microstructure of a sustainable roof tile manufactured with waste rice husk ash and ceramic sludge addition
39. Strength and durability properties of geopolymer paver blocks made with fly ash and brick kiln rice husk ash
40. Role of Industrial By-Products and Metakaolin in the Development of Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete Blends: Upscaling from Laboratory-Scale to Pilot-Scale
41. Strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete made with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Black Rice Husk Ash10.1007/s12205-015-0564-0 ↗
42. 2016
43. 2021
44. 2020
45. 2016
46. 2013
47. Efflorescence control in geopolymer binders based on natural pozzolan10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.07.007 ↗
48. Properties of fresh and hardened fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete: A review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122389 ↗
49. Effect of SiO2 and Al2 O3 on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems10.1007/s10853-012-6353-y ↗
50. The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082 ↗
51. Partial Replacement of Metakaolin with Thermally Treated Rice Husk Ash in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.112 ↗
52. 1987
53. Enhancement of the properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag based Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete by incorporating Rice Husk Ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.166 ↗
54. Chloride diffusion resistance and chloride binding capacity of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.006 ↗
55. Micro-characterisation of alkali activated paste with fly ash-GGBS-metakaolin binder system with ambient setting characteristics10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122323 ↗
56. Durability assessment of mechanochemically activated geopolymer concrete with a low molarity alkali solution
57. Effect of source materials on geopolymerisation10.1021/ie0206958 ↗
58. Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of FA-GGBS-HMNS based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.202 ↗
59. Physical–microstructural evaluation and sulfate resistance of no-cement mortar developed from a ternary binder of industrial by-products10.1002/ep.13421 ↗
60. Ternary cementless composite based on red mud, ultra-fine fly ash, and GGBS: Synergistic utilization and geopolymerization mechanism
61. Recycling and utilization assessment of waste fired clay bricks (Grog) with granulated blast-furnace slag for geopolymer production10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.001 ↗
62. Recycled Surgical Mask Waste as a Resource Material in Sustainable Geopolymer Bricks10.3390/recycling8060093 ↗
63. Characterization and life cycle assessment of geopolymer mortars with masonry units and recycled concrete aggregates assorted from construction and demolition waste
64. Gajjar, C.; Sheikh, A. India specific road transport emission factors, 2015. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28564.32646.
65. Strength, microstructure, efflorescence behavior and environmental impacts of waste glass geopolymers cured at ambient temperature10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119610 ↗
66. Development and optimization of an eco-friendly geopolymer brick production process for sustainable masonry construction
67. Embodied energy and carbon emissions analysis of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133510 ↗
68. Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of fly ash–rice husk ash blended alkali-activated concrete10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113140 ↗