journal article·2024-07Open access

Quantifying the global warming potential of low carbon concrete mixes: Comparison of existing life cycle analysis tools

Andrew Witte, Nishant Garg

Abstract

One of the most feasible approaches to reduce the carbon footprint of concrete, a critical contributor to global CO2 emissions, is to consider the high-volume replacement of cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). However, this approach currently has two issues: 1) low early-age strength, 2) inconsistent carbon accounting. To address these issues, we investigate the micro- and macro-scale performance of a series of low-carbon concrete mixes and analyze their global warming potential (GWP) using 5 unique LCA tools. We report that the cumulative heat, when normalized to the total water content, exhibits correlations with key performance metrics such as open porosity (R2 = 0.83) and compressive strength (R2 = 0.92). In addition, all LCA tools suggest that high-SCM mixes (55-70% replacement), broadly, can reduce the GWP values for concrete by ~50% (from ~450 to ~240 kg CO2-eq/m3). However, depending on the mix and the LCA tool used, for GWP values, the relative variation can be as high as 30% (~50-80 kg CO2-eq/m3). Finally, we normalize the compressive strength to the GWP metric using an ‘Integrated Strength Eco-Efficiency’ (I-SEE) coefficient, which can be a potential parameter for simultaneously assessing concrete’s performance and environmental impact.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. From unavoidable CO 2 source to CO 2 sink? A cement industry based on CO 2 mineralization10.1021/acs.est.0c07599 ↗
2. Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 ↗
3. The permeability of Portland limestone cement concrete10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00092-9 ↗
4. Durability of Portland-limestone cement-based materials to physical salt attack10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105859 ↗
5. Supplementary cementitious materials: new sources, characterization, and performance insights10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008 ↗
6. Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12 ↗
7. Environmental impacts of alternative cement binders10.1021/acs.est.9b05550 ↗
8. Evaluating and selecting the best sustainable ‎concrete mixes based on recycled waste materials
9. Fly ash particle characterization for predicting concrete compressive strength10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.059 ↗
10. Hydration of Portland cement with high replacement by siliceous fly ash10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.06.009 ↗
11. An examination of the reactivity of fly ash in cementitious pore solutions10.1617/s11527-012-9939-6 ↗
12. An improved basis for characterizing the suitability of fly ash as a cement replacement agent10.1111/jace.14974 ↗
13. A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.013 ↗
14. Effect of mechanical processing on sugar cane bagasse ash pozzolanicity10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.008 ↗
15. Mechanical behaviour of composite produced with quarry dust and rice husk ash for sustainable building applications
16. Concretes made of efficient multi-composite cements with slag and limestone10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.012 ↗
17. Composition and microstructure of 20-year-old ordinary Portland cement–ground granulated blast-furnace slag blends containing 0 to 100% slag10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.012 ↗
18. Influence of silica fume on the microstructure of cement pastes: new insights from 1H NMR relaxometry10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.04.005 ↗
19. C. Dedeloudis et al., Natural Pozzolans, 2018, 181–231. doi: 10.1007/978–3-319–70606-1_6.10.1007/978-3-319-70606-1_6 ↗
20. Importance of using the natural pozzolans on concrete durability10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00714-1 ↗
21. Impact of Embodied Energy on materials/buildings with partial replacement of ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) by natural pozzolanic volcanic ash10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.234 ↗
22. Effect of volcanic ash and natural pozzolana on mechanical properties of sustainable cement concrete: A comprehensive review
23. The chemical and physical origin of incineration ash reactivity in cementitious systems10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106009 ↗
24. Mechanical properties and durability performance of concretes with Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3)10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005 ↗
25. Dissolution kinetics of calcined kaolinite and montmorillonite in alkaline conditions: evidence for reactive Al(V) sites10.1111/jace.16663 ↗
26. Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106564 ↗
27. Evolution of kaolinite morphology upon exfoliation and dissolution: evidence for nanoscale layer thinning in metakaolin10.1016/j.clay.2022.106486 ↗
28. The influence of high volume of fly ash and slag on the compressive strength of self-consolidating concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.046 ↗
29. Mechanical properties of self consolidating concrete blended with high volumes of fly ash and slag10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.034 ↗
30. Reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement blends10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105799 ↗
31. Early-stage performance enhancement of concrete via commercial C-S-H seeds: from lab investigation to field implementation in Illinois, US
32. Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making
33. NRMCA North America benchmark EPD, Jan. 2022.
34. The sponge effect and carbon emission mitigation potentials of the global cement cycle10.1038/s41467-020-17583-w ↗
35. The impact of CO2 uptake rate on the environmental performance of cementitious composites: a new dynamic Global Warming Potential analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134155 ↗
36. Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.011 ↗
37. A comprehensive assessment of the global warming potential of geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126669 ↗
38. Porosity and liquid absorption of cement paste10.1007/BF02498561 ↗
39. Creep and thermal cracking of ultra-high volume fly ash mass concrete at early age10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.018 ↗
40. Influence of the cementitious paste composition on the E-modulus and heat of hydration evolutions10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.008 ↗
41. Properties of high volume glass powder concrete10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.10.010 ↗
42. Analysis of concrete strength versus water-cement ratio relationship
43. IDOT, Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, 2022.
44. Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.015 ↗
45. Examining the pozzolanicity of supplementary cementitious materials using isothermal calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.009 ↗
46. 2018
47. Rapid screening tests for supplementary cementitious materials: past and future10.1617/s11527-015-0718-z ↗
48. A method for the mix design of low carbon concrete towards industrial production10.1617/s11527-022-02040-5 ↗
49. Investigation of blended cement hydration by isothermal calorimetry and thermal analysis10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.027 ↗
50. Phase assemblage of composite cements10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.05.009 ↗
51. Phase assemblage of cement pastes with SCM at different ages10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.059 ↗
52. Determination of the pozzolanic activity of fluid catalytic cracking residue. Thermogravimetric analysis studies on FC3R–lime pastes10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00014-0 ↗
53. Relating LC3 microstructure, surface resistivity and compressive strength development10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106920 ↗
54. Hydration kinetics of high-strength concrete with untreated coal bottom ash for internal curing10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.04.017 ↗
55. Hydration mechanisms of ternary Portland cements containing limestone powder and fly ash10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.014 ↗
56. Effect of hydration and carbonation progress on the porosity and permeability of cement pastes10.3390/ma12010192 ↗
57. Aligizaki · 2005
58. Understanding material characteristics through signature traits from helium pycnometry10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03731 ↗
59. Performance-based approaches for concrete durability: state of the art and future research needs10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.01.003 ↗
60. Durability of concrete — degradation phenomena involving detrimental chemical reactions10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.015 ↗
61. Some investigations for establishing suitability of watson’s strength-porosity model for concrete
62. OpenConcrete: a tool for estimating the environmental impacts from concrete production10.1088/2634-4505/ac8a6d ↗
63. Petek Gursel, https://greenconcrete.berkeley.edu/concretewebtool.html#statemix.
64. Transportation matters – does it? GIS-based comparative environmental assessment of concrete mixes with cement, fly ash, natural and recycled aggregates10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.021 ↗
65. Machine learning-based mix design tools to minimize carbon footprint and cost of UHPC. Part 2: cost and eco-efficiency density diagrams
66. Eco-efficiency in early design decisions: a multimethodology approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124630 ↗
67. Beyond efficiency: engineering a sustainable low-tech cementitious binder for earth-based construction10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106973 ↗
68. Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009 ↗
69. Eco-efficient design indices for reinforced concrete members10.1617/s11527-019-1398-x ↗
70. Lower binder intensity eco-efficient concretes