journal article·2023-07Open access

Single and repetitive low-velocity impact responses of sandwich composite structures with different skin and core considerations: A review

Ahmad Beng Hong Kueh, Saddam H. Abo Sabah, Diyar N. Qader, Siti Hasyyati Drahman, Mugahed Amran

Abstract

Sandwich structures are fast becoming prevalent in engineering fields due to their maximal stiffness coupled with minimal mass. However, additional to the commonly examined impact responses, which are more threatening versus those of static, the highly destructive repetitive impact loading is the more realistic condition evident in applications. Also, numerous failure modes have been observed but not well characterized for the sandwich structural configurations. This article, therefore, reviews the recent research advancements in the responses of sandwich structures subjected to low-velocity impact under both single and repetitive loading cases. The definitions of low-velocity impact are first discussed to provide the scope of this review, i.e., described as ≤ 100 m/s by different sources. The general impact performance metrics are then presented with the prospect of introducing an overall impact behavior appraisal by combining these terms into one non-dimensional index as recently published. Additionally, the paper offers an outlook on the common failure modes of sandwich structures, the relevant mode maps for failure type identification, and the factors that influence the structural responses under low-velocity impact. The main influencing factors of low-velocity impact responses comprise facesheet and core geometrical and material configurations, impactor characteristics, hydrothermal effects, and support conditions while less affected by the loading rate. Facesheet or core crushing, facesheet or core buckling, and delamination have been identified as the main failure modes regardless of due to single or repetitive impact, with indentation, penetration, and perforation being more central to the latter. Besides, several good practices for the typically employed finite element approach for investigating sandwich structures under low-velocity impact are summarized and recommended. To underline, the parametric ranges covered in this review include applied impact energies of 0.06 – 360 J, impact velocities of 0.5 – 34.2 m/s, with repeated impact numbers up to 400 times, resulting in absorption energies of 0.01 – 396.3 J, and the determined impact resistance efficiency indices within 0.57 – 143.73. The general observations of main findings summarizing impact resistance benefitting configurations and potential future directions of sandwich structure development are next laid out to motivate further studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Buckling of sandwich columns reinforced by triaxial weave fabric composite skin-sheets10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.10.007 ↗
2. Failure behavior of sandwich honeycomb composite beam containing crack at the skin10.1371/journal.pone.0227895 ↗
3. Flatwise and edgewise compression strengths of sandwich panel with silica aerogel mat
4. Impact resistance of bio-inspired sandwich beam with side-arched and honeycomb dual-core10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114439 ↗
5. Impact resistance efficiency of bio-inspired sandwich beam with different arched core materials
6. Comparative low-velocity impact behavior of bio-inspired and conventional sandwich composite beams10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.014 ↗
7. Bio-inspired vs. conventional sandwich beams: a low-velocity repeated impact behavior exploration10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.201 ↗
8. Failure mode maps of bio-inspired sandwich beams under repeated low-velocity impact10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107785 ↗
9. Flexural Behavior of Sandwich Beams with Novel Triaxially Woven Fabric Composite Skins
10. End compression of sandwich columns10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00118-X ↗
11. Computational models for sandwich panels and shells10.1115/1.3101923 ↗
12. Fairbairn, W. An Account of the Construction of the Britannia and Conway Tubular Bridges, with a Complete History of Their Progress; John Weale: London, 1849;
13. Methods and performance of structural core materials-1. Static properties10.1177/073168448900800402 ↗
14. The optimum buckling load of a flexibly supported plate composed of two sheets joined by a light weight filler when under longitudinal compression
15. Sandwich Structures10.1115/1.3097295 ↗
16. Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004 ↗
17. Donga, A. Application of Sandwich Beam in Automobile Front Bumper for Frontal Crash Analysis, Wichita State University, 2011.
18. Composite sandwich structures: the new milestone in bridge building10.1016/S0034-3617(13)70185-1 ↗
19. Editorial scope – structure and material edition10.33736/jcest.4568.2022 ↗
20. Gauthier · 1995 · Vol. 1
21. The influence of low-energy impact loads on the properties of the sandwich composite with a foam core10.3390/polym14081566 ↗
22. Sandwich structures for energy absorption applications: a review10.3390/ma14164731 ↗
23. Callister, W.D. Wiley: Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 8th Edition - William D. Callister, David G. Rethwisch; 2010;
24. Armstrong, K.B.; Graham Bevan, L.; Cole II, W.F. Care and Repair of Advanced Composites; 2nd ed.; SAE International: Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 2005;10.4271/R-336 ↗
25. Experimental investigation on slip-in connection for cold-formed steel channel sections double
26. Hassan, M.Z. The Low Velocity Impact Response of Sandwich Structures, University of Liverpool, 2012.
27. Study on mechanical properties of multi-structure dactyl-inspired sandwich honeycomb with basalt fiber10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112467 ↗
28. Experimental investigation on impact and bending properties of a novel dactyl-inspired sandwich honeycomb with carbon fiber10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119161 ↗
29. Uniaxial and biaxial bioinspired interlocking composite panels subjected to dynamic loadings10.1016/j.tws.2020.107023 ↗
30. Bioinspired material architectures from bighorn sheep horncore velar bone for impact loading applications10.1038/s41598-020-76021-5 ↗
31. Mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of tropical fruit durian (Durio zibethinus)
32. Wrapping deployment simulation analysis of leaf-inspired membrane structures10.3390/aerospace8080218 ↗
33. Dynamic response and failure mechanism of S-Shaped CFRP foldcore sandwich structure under low-velocity impact10.1016/j.tws.2022.109007 ↗
34. Investigation on manufacturing and low-velocity impact performance of all-composite sandwich structure with S-type foldcore10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115539 ↗
35. Low-velocity impact response of tube-reinforced honeycomb sandwich structure10.1016/j.tws.2020.107188 ↗
36. Characterization of moisture effects on novel agglomerated cork core sandwich composites with fiber metal laminate facesheets10.1177/1099636218789613 ↗
37. Impact response of fiber metal laminate sandwich composite structure with polypropylene honeycomb core10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.036 ↗
38. Sandwich-structured flexible PVA/CS@ MWCNTs composite films with high thermal conductivity and excellent electrical insulation10.3390/polym14122512 ↗
39. The dynamic impact response of 3d-printed polymeric sandwich structures with lattice cores: numerical and experimental investigation10.3390/polym13224032 ↗
40. Damage assessment of sandwich structures with al/sic functionally graded plasma sprayed faceplates subjected to single and repeated impacts10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115369 ↗
41. Residual compressive strength of aluminum alloy honeycomb sandwich panel in the presence of multiple impact dents10.1177/10996362211036987 ↗
42. Experimental investigation on the response and residual compressive property of honeycomb sandwich structures under single and repeated low velocity impacts
43. Energy absorption and damage characterization of GFRP laminated and PVC-foam sandwich composites under repeated impacts with reduced energies and quasi-static indentation
44. Experimental research on the repeated impacts behavior of aluminum corrugated-core sandwich structures
45. Low velocity impact behaviour of ultra high strength concrete panels10.1007/s12046-014-0280-3 ↗
46. Finite element modeling of laminated composite plates with locally delaminated interface subjected to impact loading10.1155/2014/954070 ↗
47. Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
48. A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels10.1177/0021998321990734 ↗
49. A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures
50. Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
51. Impact damage on fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composite–a review10.1177/0021998312472217 ↗
52. Modelling of impact damage and dynamics in fibre-metal laminates–a review10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.01.004 ↗
53. Hancox · 2000
54. Stacking sequence and geometrical effects on low-velocity impact behaviors of GLARE 5 (3/2) fiber–metal laminates10.1177/0892705711408165 ↗
55. The impact resistance of composite materials—a review10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
56. Abrate · 1998
57. Impactor mass and specimen geometry effects in low velocity impact of laminated composites10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L ↗
58. Predicting failure by debonding/delamination
59. Dynamic response of square sandwich plates with a metal foam core subjected to low-velocity impact10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.09.011 ↗
60. Experimental and modelling study of low velocity impacts on composite sandwich structures for railway applications10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.03.001 ↗
61. Energy-absorbing effectiveness factor10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.01.008 ↗
62. Low-velocity impact damage initiation in graphite/epoxy/nomex honeycomb-sandwich plates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00089-4 ↗
63. Experimental investigation on the dynamic behaviour of aluminum foam sandwich plate under repeated impacts10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.148 ↗
64. Experimental study on low-velocity impact responses and residual properties of composite sandwiches with metallic foam core10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.007 ↗
65. Behavior of organic gelatin/phenolic micro balloon composite under compressive loading, static and low velocity impact
66. Low-velocity impact behavior of foam core sandwich panels with inter-ply and intra-ply carbon/kevlar/epoxy hybrid face sheets10.3390/polym14051060 ↗
67. Low-velocity impact behavior of sandwich structures with additively manufactured polymer lattice cores10.1007/s11665-018-3322-x ↗
68. Impact damage of composite sandwich structures in arctic condition10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.015 ↗
69. The impact response of graded foam sandwich structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.037 ↗
70. Effect of repeated impacts on the response of plain-woven hybrid composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.01.001 ↗
71. Low-velocity impact response and post-impact flexural behaviour of composite sandwich structures with corrugated cores10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.024 ↗
72. Relative performance of metal and polymeric foam sandwich plates under low velocity impact10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.012 ↗
73. The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00009-4 ↗
74. The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich panels10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.006 ↗
75. Low velocity bending impact behavior of foam core sandwich beams: experimental10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.038 ↗
76. Residual flexural properties of CFRP sandwich structures with aluminum honeycomb cores after low-velocity impact
77. Behaviour of continuous fibre composite sandwich core under low-velocity impact10.1016/j.tws.2020.107157 ↗
78. Impact and close-in blast response of auxetic honeycomb-cored sandwich panels: experimental tests and numerical simulations10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.020 ↗
79. The effect of impactor shape on the low-velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.060 ↗
80. The dynamic response of end-clamped sandwich beams with a Y-frame or corrugated core10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.10.006 ↗
81. Dynamic crushing of sandwich panels with prismatic lattice cores10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.015 ↗
82. The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.08.007 ↗
83. Low-velocity impact characteristics and residual tensile strength of carbon fiber composite lattice core sandwich structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.007 ↗
84. Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of polyurethane foam filled pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.040 ↗
85. Sandwich structures with textile-reinforced composite foldcores under impact loads10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.001 ↗
86. Compression and low velocity impact response of sandwich panels with polyester pin-reinforced foam filled honeycomb core10.1177/1099636218792675 ↗
87. Low-velocity impact behavior of X-frame core sandwich structures–experimental and numerical investigation10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.042 ↗
88. Dynamic response of clamped sandwich beam with aluminium alloy foam core subjected to impact loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.044 ↗
89. Response of sandwich structures with pyramidal truss cores under the compression and impact loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.012 ↗
90. On the impact response of sandwich composites with cores of balsa wood and PVC foam10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.018 ↗
91. Core crush criterion to determine the strength of sandwich composite structures subjected to compression after impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.032 ↗
92. Experimental and numerical study of compression after impact of sandwich structures with metallic skins10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.045 ↗
93. Residual compression property and response of honeycomb sandwich structures subjected to single and repeated quasi-static indentation10.1515/rams-2021-0033 ↗
94. Study on the low-velocity impact response and CAI behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels with hybrid facesheet10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.058 ↗
95. Compression after impact test (CAI) on NOMEX™ honeycomb sandwich panels with thin aluminum skins10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.015 ↗
96. Investigation of low velocity impact behaviors of honeycomb sandwich composites10.1007/s12206-018-0619-5 ↗
97. A low velocity impact study on press formed thermoplastic honeycomb sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111061 ↗
98. Crashworthiness investigation of the bio-inspired Bi-directionally corrugated core sandwich panel under quasi-static crushing load10.1016/j.matdes.2017.09.040 ↗
99. Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.030 ↗
100. The deformation mode and strengthening mechanism of compression in the beetle elytron plate10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.014 ↗