journal article·2024-07Open access

Predictive modelling of compressive strength of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques

Yejia Wang, Ammar Iqtidar, Muhammad Nasir Amin, Sohaib Nazar, Ahmed M. Hassan, Mujahid Ali

Abstract

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is proving to be hazardous to the environment. To replace the OPC, geopolymers (GPs) are introduced. However, to fully replace the OPC by GPs extensive laboratory tests are required to assess the long-term and short-term properties of GPs in different scenarios. Given the shortage of time for performing such extensive testing, artificial intelligence (AI) is used to analyze the properties of GPs. In this study, different AI techniques such as artificial neuro network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and gene expression programming (GEP) are used to obtain the predictive models for estimating the compressive strength of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag-based GP concrete. Different statistical parameters are used to evaluate the performance of predictive models. Similarly, sensitivity and parametric analysis are also conducted on the input parameters. Additionally, multiple linear regression was also performed on the whole database. After comparing all the results, it was concluded that GEP is the best AI technique to predict the compressive strength of GP-based concrete.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. “U.S.: cement production 2021,” Statista. Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.statista.com/statistics/219343/cement-production-worldwide/〉 (The source of the database was from separate FA-based concrete and GGBFS-based concrete).
2. “Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production - ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652621014967〉.
3. Analysis of theoretical carbon dioxide emissions from cement production: Methodology and application10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130270 ↗
4. Experimental and simulation evaluation of CO2/CO separation under different component ratios in blast furnace gas on zeolites10.1016/j.cej.2023.144579 ↗
5. Exploring green and efficient zero-dimensional carbon-based inhibitors for carbon steel: from performance to mechanism10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134334 ↗
6. The role of TBM asymmetric tail-grouting on surface settlement in coarse-grained soils of urban area: field tests and FEA modelling10.1016/j.tust.2021.103857 ↗
7. Utilization of industrial by-products/waste to manufacture geopolymer cement/concrete10.3390/su13020873 ↗
8. “Davidovits: Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications…. - Google Scholar.” Accessed: Aug. 07, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Geopolymer%20Chemistry%20and%20Applications&author=J.%20Davidovits&publication_year=2008〉.
9. Interplay between silicate and hydroxide ions during geopolymerization10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.012 ↗
10. Improvements in the engineering properties of cementitious composites using nano-sized cement and nano-sized additives10.3390/ma15228066 ↗
11. Activation of slag through a combination of NaOH/NaS alkali for transforming it into geopolymer slag binder mortar – assessment the effects of two different Blaine fines and three different curing conditions10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.014 ↗
12. “Infrastructures | Free Full-Text | Mix Design and Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash and GGBFS-Synthesized Alkali-Activated Concrete (AAC).” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/4/2/20〉.10.3390/infrastructures4020020 ↗
13. “Effect of GGBS Addition on Reactivity and Microstructure Properties of Ambient Cured Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete | SpringerLink.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12633-020-00470-w〉.
14. Fire resistant properties of alumino silicate geopolymer cement mortars10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.018 ↗
15. The influence of pipe-jacking tunneling on deformation of existing tunnels in soft soils and the effectiveness of protection measures10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101061 ↗
16. Exploiting machine learning for controlled synthesis of carbon dots-based corrosion inhibitors10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138210 ↗
17. Additive manufacturing of high solid content lunar regolith simulant paste based on vat photopolymerization and the effect of water addition on paste retention properties
18. Comparative study for efficacy of chemically treated jute fiber and bamboo fiber on the properties of reinforced concrete beams10.1080/15440478.2022.2054894 ↗
19. Effect of recycled coarse aggregate quality on the interfacial property and sulfuric acid resistance of geopolymer concrete at different acidity levels10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130919 ↗
20. “Materials | Free Full-Text | Resistance to Sulfuric Acid Corrosion of Geopolymer Concrete Based on Different Binding Materials and Alkali Concentrations.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/23/7109〉.10.3390/ma14237109 ↗
21. Corrosion effect of acid/alkali on cementitious red mud-fly ash materials containing heavy metal residues10.1016/j.eti.2023.103485 ↗
22. Risk assessment for the long-term stability of fly ash-based cementitious material containing arsenic: dynamic and semidynamic leaching10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123361 ↗
23. Experimental investigation on the bond performance of sea sand coral concrete with FRP bar reinforcement for marine environments10.1177/13694332221131153 ↗
24. Seismic behavior of a replaceable artificial controllable plastic hinge for precast concrete beam-column joint10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112848 ↗
25. Establishing a 3D aggregates database from X-ray CT scans of bulk concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125740 ↗
26. Effect of alkali activators on diffusivity of metakaolin-based geopolymers10.1617/s11527-021-01758-y ↗
27. Property assessment of high-performance concrete containing three types of fibers10.1186/s40069-021-00476-7 ↗
28. Fabrication and characterizations of Glass fiber-reinforced functional leaf spring composites with or without microcapsule-based dicyclopentadiene as self-healing agent for automobile industrial applications: comparative analysis10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.039 ↗
29. Chemical shrinkage of paste and mortar containing limestone fines10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.288 ↗
30. Chemical shrinkage of paste and mortar containing limestone fines10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.288 ↗
31. Seismic behavior of a friction-type artificial plastic hinge for the precast beam–column connection10.1007/s43452-022-00526-1 ↗
32. Ternary cementless composite based on red mud, ultra-fine fly ash, and GGBS: synergistic utilization and geopolymerization mechanism
33. Utilization of antimony tailings in fiber-reinforced 3D printed concrete: a sustainable approach for construction materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133689 ↗
34. Workability, strength, modulus of elasticity, and permeability feature of wheat straw ash-incorporated hydraulic cement concrete10.3390/buildings12091363 ↗
35. Fabrication and characterization of cement-based hybrid concrete containing coir fiber for advancing concrete construction10.3390/buildings12091450 ↗
36. Production of roller compacted concrete made of recycled asphalt pavement aggregate and recycled concrete aggregate and silica fume10.1007/s42947-021-00068-4 ↗
37. The effect of content and fineness of natural pozzolana on the rheological, mechanical, and durability properties of self-compacting mortar
38. A. Iqtidar, M.F. Javed, U. Khurshid, J. Ihsaan, and H. Kamal, “ONE PART GEOPOLYMER USING RICE HUSK ASH AND METAKAOLIN”.
39. Study on the optimum initial curing condition for fly ash and GGBS based geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118540 ↗
40. Fly ash application as supplementary cementitious material: a review10.3390/ma15072664 ↗
41. Evaluation of high-volume fly ash (HVFA) concrete modified by metakaolin: technical, economic and environmental analysis10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117121 ↗
42. Influence of steel and PP fibers on mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-GGBFS based geopolymer composites10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.232 ↗
43. A review: GGBS as a cement replacement in concrete
44. “Effect on the strength of GGBS and fly ash based geopolymer concrete - ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785322028395〉.
45. “(PDF) INFLUENCE OF GGBS AND FLY ASH ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE | Tarun Gehlot - Academia.edu.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.academia.edu/41791370/INFLUENCE_OF_GGBS_AND_FLY_ASH_ON_COMPRESSIVE_STRENGTH_OF_CONCRETE〉.
46. “Effect and influence of fly ash and GGBS on properties of ambient cured self-compacting geopolymer concrete for in situ applications | AIP Conference Proceedings | AIP Publishing.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2039/1/020064/726843/Effect-and-influence-of-fly-ash-and-GGBS-on?redirectedFrom=fulltext〉.10.1063/1.5079023 ↗
47. Machine learning method to predict dynamic compressive response of concrete-like material at high strain rates10.1016/j.dt.2022.02.003 ↗
48. The influence of basalt fiber on the mechanical performance of concrete-filled steel tube short columns under axial compression10.3389/fmats.2023.1332269 ↗
49. Seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tubular composite columns with ultra high performance concrete plates10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115500 ↗
50. Effects of the position and chloride-induced corrosion of strand on bonding behavior between the steel strand and concrete10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105500 ↗
51. Cyclic constitutive equations of rock with coupled damage induced by compaction and cracking10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.06.010 ↗
52. Comparison of machine learning approaches with traditional methods for predicting the compressive strength of rice husk ash concrete10.3390/cryst11070779 ↗
53. Numerical aspects of phase field models for low-temperature fracture in asphalt mixtures
54. Plastic concrete mechanical properties prediction based on experimental data
55. Modeling the capacity of engineered cementitious composites for self-healing using AI-based ensemble techniques
56. Prediction models for marshall mix parameters using bio-inspired genetic programming and deep machine learning approaches: a comparative study
57. Crack width prediction of self-healing engineered cementitious composite using multi-expression programming10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.036 ↗
58. Application of artificial intelligence to evaluate the fresh properties of self-consolidating concrete10.3390/ma14174885 ↗
59. Micro–macro approach of anisotropic damage: a semi-analytical constitutive model of porous cracked rock10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109483 ↗
60. Structural evolution and policy orientation of China’s rare earth innovation network: a social network analysis based on collaborative patents10.15244/pjoes/174511 ↗
61. Geopolymer concrete compressive strength via artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy interface system, and gene expression programming with K-fold cross validation10.3389/fmats.2021.621163 ↗
62. “A comparative study of ANN and ANFIS models for the prediction of cement-based mortar materials compressive strength | SpringerLink.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-020-05244-4〉.
63. “(PDF) A comparative study of artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models in distribution system with nondeterministic inputs | Modestus Okwu - Academia.edu.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.academia.edu/42357520/A_comparative_study_of_artificial_neural_network_ANN_and_adaptive_neuro_fuzzy_inference_system_ANFIS_models_in_distribution_system_with_nondeterministic_inputs〉.
64. “Exploration of mechanical and durability characteristics of fly ash-GGBFS based green geopolymer concrete | SN Applied Sciences.” Accessed: Dec. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: 〈https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-020-2720-5〉.
65. Predicting the ingredients of self compacting concrete using artificial neural network10.1016/j.aej.2017.04.007 ↗
66. Artificial neural networks: a practical review of applications involving fractional calculus10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00455-3 ↗
67. New activation functions for single layer feedforward neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113977 ↗
68. Predicting the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using ANN and ANFIS hybridized with grey wolf optimizer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117266 ↗
69. Evaluation of ANN and ANFIS modeling ability in the prediction of AISI 1050 steel machining performance10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06136 ↗
70. Adsorptive removal of Pb (II) by means of hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanocomposite hybrid nanoadsorbent: ANFIS modeling and experimental study10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.047 ↗
71. Development of an intelligent system based on ANFIS model for predicting soil erosion10.1007/s12665-018-7348-z ↗
72. Gene expression programming for process parameter optimization during ultrafiltration of surfactant wastewater using hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110444 ↗
73. “A comprehensive review on identification of the geomaterial constitutive model using the computational intelligence method - ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1474034618302799〉.
74. Gene expression programming in problem solving
75. A new empirical formula for evaluating uniaxial compressive strength using the Schmidt hammer test10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104094 ↗
76. New prediction models for unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer stabilized soil using multi-gen genetic programming10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.043 ↗
77. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
78. “Uniaxial compressive strength prediction through a new technique based on gene expression programming | SpringerLink.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-017-2939-2〉.
79. Prediction of pavement roughness using a hybrid gene expression programming-neural network technique
80. Characterization of concrete containing RCA and GGBFS: mechanical, microstructural and environmental properties10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123134 ↗
81. An experimental study on strength development of concrete containing fly ash and optimum usage of fly ash in concrete10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.031 ↗
82. Influence of fly ash on concrete – a systematic review10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.425 ↗
83. Effects of fly ash fineness on the mechanical properties of concrete10.1007/s12046-012-0083-3 ↗
84. P.K. Mehta, “HIGH PERFORMANCE, HIGH-VOLUME FLY ASH CONCRETE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,” in r, 2004. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: 〈https://trid.trb.org/View/741553〉.
85. Combine effect of rice husk ash and fly ash on concrete by 30% cement replacement10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.009 ↗
86. Use of recycled concrete aggregate in fly-ash concrete
87. Effect of ultra-fine fly ash on concrete performance and durability10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120493 ↗
88. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 ↗
89. Properties of concrete containing ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) at elevated temperatures10.1016/j.jare.2011.03.004 ↗
90. Effect of GGBFS on time dependent compressive strength of concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.007 ↗
91. Reviewing the influence of GGBFS on concrete properties10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.410 ↗
92. Structure and strength of NaOH activated concretes containing fly ash or GGBFS as the sole binder10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.007 ↗
93. “Technical note: how to rationally compare the performances of different machine learning models? [PeerJ Preprints].” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://peerj.com/preprints/26714/〉.
94. “Design equations for prediction of pressuremeter soil deformation moduli utilizing expression programming systems | SpringerLink.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-012-1144-6〉.
95. Prediction of mechanical properties of green concrete incorporating waste foundry sand based on gene expression programming10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121322 ↗
96. “Genetic Programming for Modelling of Geotechnical Engineering Systems | SpringerLink.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-20883-1_2〉.
97. Recent advances and future challenges for artificial neural systems in geotechnical engineering applications
98. “Estimating the refractive index of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin using genetic algorithm – support vector regression model - ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169260718301871〉.
99. “State-of-the-art review of soft computing applications in underground excavations - ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987119302361〉.
100. Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.001 ↗