Acetylacetone–sulfur polymer-derived sulfur/oxygen-doped porous carbons for co₂ capture and lithium–sulfur battery separator coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Sulfur/oxygen-rich polymer-derived carbons are promising multifunctional materials; however, solvent-assisted strategies for transforming low-molecular-weight oxygenated liquids into solid carbonizable networks remain underexplored. Herein, acetylacetone was used as an oxygen-bearing liquid precursor in a DMSO-assisted acetylacetone–sulfur reaction to form an acetylacetone–sulfur polymer (AcAcPS), which was subsequently converted into sulfur/oxygen-containing porous carbons by CO₂ activation or NaCl templating. XRD, Raman, FTIR, XPS, solid-state ¹³C NMR, DSC, and electrochemical analyses supported the formation of a chemically transformed sulfur–organic network containing AcAc-derived carbonyl/enolic functionalities. The resulting CO₂-C and NaCl-C carbons retained high sulfur contents of approximately 20–22 wt% and low oxygen contents of 2–4 wt%, while exhibiting distinct microporous/ultramicroporous and micro/macroporous architectures, respectively. At 298 K and 0.15 bar, CO₂-C and NaCl-C exhibited CO₂ uptakes of 0.75 and 0.81 mmol g⁻¹, respectively, and retained 0.52 and 0.58 mmol g⁻¹ at 313 K. When used as Li–S separator-coating additives at only 12.5 wt% of the coating formulation, CO₂-C and NaCl-C delivered sulfur-mass-normalized recovery capacities of 870 and 879 mAh g⁻¹, respectively, after returning to 0.1 C following the 2 C rate step, exceeding the conductive-carbon-only coating. UV–Vis adsorption/permeation tests and DFT calculations indicate that sulfur-containing carbon sites enhance interactions with Li₂S₆, although electrochemical performance also depends on pore accessibility, particle agglomeration, coating morphology, electrical connectivity, and interfacial transport. Overall, this work demonstrates a DMSO-assisted ketone–sulfur route for transforming an oxygen-bearing liquid molecule into sulfur-rich porous carbons with dual functionality in post-combustion CO₂ capture and Li–S separator modification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Chung SH, Chang CH, Manthiram A (2018) Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable. Adv Funct Mater 28:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180118810.1002/adfm.201801188 ↗
2. Liu Q, Su X, Lei D, Qin Y, Wen J, Guo F, Wu YA, Rong Y, Kou R, Xiao X, Aguesse F, Bareño J, Ren Y, Lu W, Li Y (2018) Approaching the capacity limit of lithium cobalt oxide in lithium ion batteries via lanthanum and aluminium doping. Nat Energy 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0180-610.1038/s41560-018-0180-6 ↗
3. McCloskey BD (2015) Attainable Gravimetric and Volumetric Energy Density of Li-S and Li Ion Battery Cells with Solid Separator-Protected Li Metal Anodes. J Phys Chem Lett 6:4581–4588. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0181410.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01814 ↗
4. Chung WJ, Griebel JJ, Kim ET, Yoon H, Simmonds AG, Ji HJ, Dirlam PT, Glass RS, Wie JJ, Nguyen NA, Guralnick BW, Park J, Somogyi Á, Theato P, Mackay ME, Sung YE, Char K, Pyun J (2013) The use of elemental sulfur as an alternative feedstock for polymeric materials. Nat Chem 5:518–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.162410.1038/nchem.1624 ↗
5. Zerrin T, Shang R, Dong B, Aguilar EC, Malvin J, Ozkan M, Ozkan CS (2022) An overlooked parameter in Li-S batteries: The impact of electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio on capacity fading. Nano Energy 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10791310.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107913 ↗
6. Ma L, Zhuang HL, Wei S, Hendrickson KE, Kim MS, Cohn G, Hennig RG, Archer LA (2016) Enhanced Li-S batteries using amine-functionalized carbon nanotubes in the cathode. ACS Nano 10:1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0637310.1021/acsnano.5b06373 ↗
7. Ling M, Zhang L, Zheng T, Feng J, Guo J, Mai L, Liu G (2017) Nucleophilic substitution between polysulfides and binders unexpectedly stabilizing lithium sulfur battery. Nano Energy 38:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.02010.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.020 ↗
8. Li Z, Sami I, Yang J, Li J, Kumar RV, Chhowalla M (2023) Lithiated metallic molybdenum disulfide nanosheets for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat Energy 8:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01175-710.1038/s41560-022-01175-7 ↗
9. Liang X, Hart C, Pang Q, Garsuch A, Weiss T, Nazar LF (2015) A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms668210.1038/ncomms6682 ↗
10. Pang Q, Kwok CY, Kundu D, Liang X, Nazar LF (2019) Lightweight Metallic MgB2 Mediates Polysulfide Redox and Promises High-Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Joule 3:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.02410.1016/j.joule.2018.09.024 ↗
11. Park J, Moon J, Kim C, Kang JH, Lim E, Park J, Lee KJ, Yu SH, Seo JH, Lee J, Heo J, Tanaka N, Cho SP, Pyun J, Cabana J, Hong BH, Sung YE (2016) Graphene quantum dots: Structural integrity and oxygen functional groups for high sulfur/sulfide utilization in lithium sulfur batteries. NPG Asia Mater 8(e272–10). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2016.6110.1038/am.2016.61 ↗
12. Zhou W, Chen H, Yu Y, Wang D, Cui Z, Disalvo FJ, Abruña HD (2013) Amylopectin wrapped graphene oxide/sulfur for improved cyclability of Lithium-Sulfur battery. ACS Nano 7:8801–8808. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn403237b10.1021/nn403237b ↗
13. Grace JP, Martha SK (2025) Sulfur-doped biocarbon as a sulfur host and a polysulfide trapping agent in lithium-sulfur batteries. Ionics (Kiel). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-025-06308-y10.1007/s11581-025-06308-y ↗
14. Zhou L, Lin X, Huang T, Yu A (2014) Binder-free phenyl sulfonated graphene/sulfur electrodes with excellent cyclability for lithium sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem Mater 2:5117. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta15175a10.1039/c3ta15175a ↗
15. Evers S, Nazar LF (2012) Graphene-enveloped sulfur in a one pot reaction: A cathode with good coulombic efficiency and high practical sulfur content. Chem Commun 48:1233–1235. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc16726c10.1039/c2cc16726c ↗
16. Chang N, Zhou C, Fu H, Zhao Y, Shui J (2017) One-Pot Synthesis of Functionalized Holey Graphene/Sulfur Composite for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv Mater Interfaces 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20170078310.1002/admi.201700783 ↗
17. Zhu Q, Zhao Q, An Y, Anasori B, Wang H, Xu B (2017) Ultra-microporous carbons encapsulate small sulfur molecules for high performance lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy 33:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.06010.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.060 ↗
18. Zheng S, Wen Y, Zhu Y, Han Z, Wang J, Yang J, Wang C (2014) situ sulfur reduction and intercalation of graphite oxides for Li-S battery cathodes. Adv Energy Mater 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140048210.1002/aenm.201400482 ↗
19. Ryu HS, Park JW, Park J, Ahn J-P, Kim K-W, Ahn J-H, Nam T-H, Wang G, Ahn H-J (2013) High capacity cathode materials for Li–S batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:1573–1578. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00056C10.1039/C2TA00056C ↗
20. Li M, Zhang Y, Wang X, Ahn W, Jiang G, Feng K, Lui G, Chen Z (2016) Gas Pickering Emulsion Templated Hollow Carbon for High Rate Performance Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26:8408–8417. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160324110.1002/adfm.201603241 ↗
21. Chen H, Wang C, Hu C, Zhang J, Gao S, Lu W, Chen L (2015) Vulcanization accelerator enabled sulfurized carbon materials for high capacity and high stability of lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:1392–1395. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA05938G10.1039/C4TA05938G ↗
22. Wei S, Xu S, Agrawral A, Choudhury S, Lu Y, Tu Z, Ma L, Archer LA (2016) A stable room-temperature sodium-sulfur battery. Nat Commun 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1172210.1038/ncomms11722 ↗
23. English-language T (2006) International Standard:Pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption/Part 3
24. Egun IL, Hu J, Offiong NAO, Akwaowo ES, Essien ES, Hou Y, Chen Z (2025) Conversion of waste tires to porous carbon towards diverse applications with enhanced performance. Carbon Lett 35:1955–1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-025-00965-910.1007/s42823-025-00965-9 ↗
25. Hippauf F, Nickel W, Hao GP, Schwedtmann K, Giebeler L, Oswald S, Borchardt L, Doerfler S, Weigand JJ, Kaskel S (2016) The Importance of Pore Size and Surface Polarity for Polysulfide Adsorption in Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Adv Mater Interfaces 3:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20160050810.1002/admi.201600508 ↗
26. Zhang C, Wang R, Wang Y, Ren G, Zhang X, Li R, Fan C (2021) Synthesis of millimeter-sized porous carbon spheres derived from different precursors for CO2 capture. J Porous Mater 28:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-020-00967-010.1007/s10934-020-00967-0 ↗
27. Fechler N, Zussblatt NP, Rothe R, Schlögl R, Willinger MG, Chmelka BF, Antonietti M (2016) Eutectic Syntheses of Graphitic Carbon with High Pyrazinic Nitrogen Content. Adv Mater 28:1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150150310.1002/adma.201501503 ↗
28. Wu Z-Y, Xu S-L, Yan Q-Q, Chen Z-Q, Ding Y-W, Li C, Liang H-W, Yu S-H (2018) Transition metal–assisted carbonization of small organic molecules toward functional carbon materials. Sci Adv 4:eaat0788. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat078810.1126/sciadv.aat0788 ↗
29. Shui L, Wang L, Lin Y (2023) A Peach-Kernel-Derived Ultramicroporous Carbon with Extremely High CO2-Capture Ability. ChemistrySelect 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20220428710.1002/slct.202204287 ↗
30. Chang Y, Antonietti M, Fellinger TP (2015) Synthesis of nanostructured carbon through ionothermal carbonization of common organic solvents and solutions. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:5507–5512. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20141168510.1002/anie.201411685 ↗
31. Chen G, Wang X, Li J, Hou W, Zhou Y, Wang J (2015) Direct Carbonization of Cyanopyridinium Crystalline Dicationic Salts into Nitrogen-Enriched Ultra-Microporous Carbons toward Excellent CO 2 Adsorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:18508–18518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0484210.1021/acsami.5b04842 ↗
32. Crockett MP, Evans AM, Worthington MJH, Albuquerque IS, Slattery AD, Gibson CT, Campbell JA, Lewis DA, Bernardes GJL, Chalker JM (2016) Sulfur-Limonene Polysulfide: A Material Synthesized Entirely from Industrial By-Products and Its Use in Removing Toxic Metals from Water and Soil. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:1714–1718. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20150870810.1002/anie.201508708 ↗
33. Wu X, Smith JA, Petcher S, Zhang B, Parker DJ, Griffin JM, Hasell T (2019) Catalytic inverse vulcanization. Nat Commun 10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08430-810.1038/s41467-019-08430-8 ↗
34. Hasell T, Parker DJ, Jones HA, McAllister T, Howdle SM (2016) Porous inverse vulcanised polymers for mercury capture. Chem Commun 52:5383–5386. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CC00938G10.1039/C6CC00938G ↗
35. Chen Y, Yasin A, Zhang Y, Zan X, Liu Y, Zhang L (2020) Preparation and modification of biomass-based functional rubbers for removing mercury(II) from aqueous solution. Materials 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1303063210.3390/ma13030632 ↗
36. Zaman AC, Kaya F, Kaya C (2026) DMSO-assisted copolymerization of acetone and sulfur and its application as a Li–S battery cathode, Ionics (Kiel). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-026-07184-w10.1007/s11581-026-07184-w ↗
37. Zhang B, Petcher S, Gao H, Yan P, Cai D, Fleming G, Parker DJ, Chong SY, Hasell T (2021) Magnetic sulfur-doped carbons for mercury adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 603:728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.12910.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.129 ↗
38. Shamsuddin R, Ghumman ASM, Steven R, Sami A, Waqas S, Ahmad ZN, Water (2025) 5 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c0003010.1021/acsestwater.5c00030 ↗
39. Mann M, Luo X, Tikoalu AD, Gibson CT, Yin Y, Al-Attabi R, Andersson GG, Raston CL, Henderson LC, Pring A, Hasell T, Chalker JM (2021) Carbonisation of a polymer made from sulfur and canola oil. Chem Commun 57:6296–6299. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cc01555a10.1039/d1cc01555a ↗
40. Bear JC, McGettrick JD, Parkin IP, Dunnill CW, Hasell T (2016) Porous carbons from inverse vulcanised polymers. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 232:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.06.02110.1016/j.micromeso.2016.06.021 ↗
41. Liu R, Shi X, Wang C, Gao Y, Xu S, Hao G, Chen S, Lu A (2021) Advances in Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture by Physical Adsorption: From Materials Innovation to Separation Practice. Chemsuschem 14:1428–1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20200267710.1002/cssc.202002677 ↗
42. Zhang Z, Zhou J, Xing W, Xue Q, Yan Z, Zhuo S, Qiao SZ (2013) Critical role of small micropores in high CO2 uptake. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:2523–2529. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp44436d10.1039/c2cp44436d ↗
43. Pettinari C, Tombesi A (2020) Metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture. MRS Energy Sustain 7:35. https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2020.3010.1557/mre.2020.30 ↗
44. Younas M, Rezakazemi M, Daud M, Wazir MB, Ahmad S, Ullah N, Inamuddin S, Ramakrishna (2020) Recent progress and remaining challenges in post-combustion CO2 capture using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), Prog. Energy Combust Sci 80:100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.10084910.1016/j.pecs.2020.100849 ↗
45. Gao H, Ding L, Bai H, Li L (2017) Microporous Organic Polymers Based on Hyper-Crosslinked Coal Tar: Preparation and Application for Gas Adsorption. Chemsuschem 10:618–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20160147510.1002/cssc.201601475 ↗
46. D’Alessandro DM, Smit B, Long JR (2010) Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:6058–6082. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100043110.1002/anie.201000431 ↗
47. Mallesh D, Swapna S, Rajitha P, Soujanya Y, Sumana C, Lingaiah N (2023) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of porous carbon adsorbents derived from waste biomass for CO2 capture. Carbon Lett 33:1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00487-210.1007/s42823-023-00487-2 ↗
48. Li J, Tian L, Liang F, Wang J, Han L, Zhang J, Ge S, Dong L, Zhang H, Zhang S (2019) Molten salt synthesis of hierarchical porous N-doped carbon submicrospheres for multifunctional applications: High performance supercapacitor, dye removal and CO2 capture. Carbon N Y 141:739–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.06110.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.061 ↗
49. Sethia G, Sayari A (2015) Comprehensive study of ultra-microporous nitrogen-doped activated carbon for CO2 capture. Carbon N Y 93:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.01710.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.017 ↗
50. Saha D, Van Bramer SE, Orkoulas G, Ho HC, Chen J, Henley DK (2017) CO2 capture in lignin-derived and nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbons. Carbon N Y 121:257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.08810.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.088 ↗
51. Kim YK, Kim GM, Lee JW (2015) Highly porous N-doped carbons impregnated with sodium for efficient CO2 capture. J Mater Chem Mater 3:10919–10927. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta01776a10.1039/c5ta01776a ↗
52. Fu N, Wei HM, Lin HL, Li L, Ji CH, Yu NB, Chen HJ, Han S, Xiao GY (2017) Iron Nanoclusters as Template/Activator for the Synthesis of Nitrogen Doped Porous Carbon and Its CO2 Adsorption Application, ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 9:9955–9963. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1572310.1021/acsami.6b15723 ↗
53. Rehman A, Heo Y-J, Nazir G, Park S-J (2021) Solvent-free, one-pot synthesis of nitrogen-tailored alkali-activated microporous carbons with an efficient CO2 adsorption. Carbon N Y 172:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.08810.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.088 ↗
54. Khodabakhshi S, Taddei M, Rudd JA, McPherson MJ, Niu Y, Palmer RE, Barron AR, Andreoli E (2021) Interplay between oxygen doping and ultra-microporosity improves the CO2/N2 separation performance of carbons derived from aromatic polycarboxylates. Carbon N Y 173:989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.08010.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.080 ↗
55. Zaman AC, Karaaslan OF (2022) Sulfur/oxygen-doped porous carbons via NaCl-assisted thermolysis of a molecular precursor for CO2 capture. Mater Chem Phys 276:125288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12528810.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125288 ↗
56. Bandosz TJ, Seredych M, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Cheng Y, Daemen LL, Ramírez-Cuesta AJ (2016) Evidence for CO2 reactive adsorption on nanoporous S- and N-doped carbon at ambient conditions. Carbon N Y 96:856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.00710.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.007 ↗
57. Lee JSM, Parker DJ, Cooper AI, Hasell T (2017) High surface area sulfur-doped microporous carbons from inverse vulcanised polymers. J Mater Chem Mater 5:18603–18609. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta07130b10.1039/c7ta07130b ↗
58. Seredych M, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Bandosz TJ (2016) Alterations of S-doped porous carbon-rGO composites surface features upon CO2 adsorption at ambient conditions. Carbon N Y 107:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.02810.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.028 ↗
59. Seredych M, Jagiello J, Bandosz TJ (2014) Complexity of CO2 adsorption on nanoporous sulfur-doped carbons - Is surface chemistry an important factor? Carbon N Y 74:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.02410.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.024 ↗
60. Xia Y, Zhu Y, Tang Y (2012) Preparation of sulfur-doped microporous carbons for the storage of hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Carbon N Y 50:5543–5553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.04410.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.044 ↗
61. Li X, Xue Q, Chang X, Zhu L, Ling C, Zheng H (2017) Effects of Sulfur Doping and Humidity on CO2 Capture by Graphite Split Pore: A Theoretical Study, ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 9:8336–8343. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1428110.1021/acsami.6b14281 ↗
62. Seema H, Kemp KC, Le NH, Park SW, Chandra V, Lee JW, Kim KS (2014) Highly selective CO2 capture by S-doped microporous carbon materials. Carbon N Y 66:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.00610.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.006 ↗
63. Wang EJ, Sui ZY, Sun YN, Ma Z, Han BH (2018) Effect of Porosity Parameters and Surface Chemistry on Carbon Dioxide Adsorption in Sulfur-Doped Porous Carbons. Langmuir 34:6358–6366. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0437010.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04370 ↗
64. Pang Y, Wei J, Wang Y, Xia Y (2018) Synergetic Protective Effect of the Ultralight MWCNTs/NCQDs Modified Separator for Highly Stable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv Energy Mater 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170228810.1002/aenm.201702288 ↗
65. Abbas SA, Ding J, Wu SH, Fang J, Boopathi KM, Mohapatra A, Lee LW, Wang PC, Chang CC, Chu CW (2017) Modified Separator Performing Dual Physical/Chemical Roles to Inhibit Polysulfide Shuttle Resulting in Ultrastable Li-S Batteries. ACS Nano 11:12436–12445. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b0647810.1021/acsnano.7b06478 ↗
66. Shao H, Wang W, Zhang H, Wang A, Chen X, Huang Y (2018) Nano-TiO2 decorated carbon coating on the separator to physically and chemically suppress the shuttle effect for lithium-sulfur battery. J Power Sources 378:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.06710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.067 ↗
67. Zhu J, Ge Y, Kim D, Lu Y, Chen C, Jiang M, Zhang X (2016) A novel separator coated by carbon for achieving exceptional high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 20:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.02210.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.022 ↗
68. Yao H, Yan K, Li W, Zheng G, Kong D, Seh ZW, Narasimhan VK, Liang Z, Cui Y (2014) Improved lithium-sulfur batteries with a conductive coating on the separator to prevent the accumulation of inactive S-related species at the cathode-separator interface. Energy Environ Sci 7:3381–3390. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee01377h10.1039/c4ee01377h ↗
69. Simon CM, Smit B, Haranczyk M (2016) Ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) Python package. Comput Phys Commun 200:364–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.01610.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.016 ↗
70. Myers AL, Prausnitz JM (1965) Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption. AIChE J 11:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69011012510.1002/aic.690110125 ↗
71. Neese F (2022) Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev Comput Mol Sci 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.160610.1002/wcms.1606 ↗
72. Jarrín RA, Bennett K, Thoi VS, Bukowski BC (2023) Cations Mediate Lithium Polysulfide Adsorption in Metal-Organic Framework Coatings for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-hzzg410.26434/chemrxiv-2023-hzzg4 ↗
73. ISO [International Organization for Standardization] (2010) Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption - BET method (ISO 9277:2010(E)), 2010. 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0297-310.1007/s11367-011-0297-3 ↗
74. Zhang Y, Pavlopoulos NG, Kleine TS, Karayilan M, Glass RS, Char K, Pyun J (2019) Nucleophilic Activation of Elemental Sulfur for Inverse Vulcanization and Dynamic Covalent Polymerizations. J Polym Sci Polym Chem 57:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.2926610.1002/pola.29266 ↗
75. Wang W, Chen W, Miao P, Luo J, Wei Z, Chen S (2017) NaCl Crystallites as Dual-Functional and Water-Removable Templates To Synthesize a Three-Dimensional Graphene-like Macroporous Fe-N-C Catalyst. ACS Catal 7:6144–6149. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0169510.1021/acscatal.7b01695 ↗
76. Chung WJ, Simmonds AG, Griebel JJ, Kim ET, Suh HS, Shim I, Glass RS, Loy DA, Theato P, Sung Y, Char K, Pyun J (2011) Elemental Sulfur as a Reactive Medium for Gold Nanoparticles and Nanocomposite Materials. 11409–11412. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20110423710.1002/anie.201104237 ↗
77. Parker DJ, Chong ST, Hasell T (2018) Sustainable inverse-vulcanised sulfur polymers. RSC Adv 8:27892–27899. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04446e10.1039/c8ra04446e ↗
78. Lian Q, Li Y, Li K, Cheng J, Zhang J (2017) Insights into the Vulcanization Mechanism through a Simple and Facile Approach to the Sulfur Cleavage Behavior. Macromolecules 50:803–810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0233510.1021/acs.macromol.6b02335 ↗
79. Bhargav A, Patil SV, Fu Y (2017) A phenyl disulfide@CNT composite cathode for rechargeable lithium batteries. Sustain Energy Fuels 1:1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7se00135e10.1039/c7se00135e ↗
80. Wu M, Cui Y, Bhargav A, Losovyj Y, Siegel A, Agarwal M, Ma Y, Fu Y (2016) Organotrisulfide: A High Capacity Cathode Material for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Angew Chem 128:10181–10185. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20160389710.1002/ange.201603897 ↗
81. Liu K, Zheng J, Zhong G, Yang Y (2011) Poly(2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinonyl sulfide) (PDBS) as a cathode material for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem 21:4125–4131. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm03127e10.1039/c0jm03127e ↗
82. Park S, Chung M, Lamprou A, Seidel K, Song S, Schade C, Lim J, Char K (2022) High strength, epoxy cross-linked high sulfur content polymers from one-step reactive compatibilization inverse vulcanization. Chem Sci 13:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1sc05896g10.1039/d1sc05896g ↗
83. Shankarayya Wadi VK, Jena KK, Khawaja SZ, Yannakopoulou K, Fardis M, Mitrikas G, Karagianni M, Papavassiliou G (2018) Alhassan, NMR and EPR Structural Analysis and Stability Study of Inverse Vulcanized Sulfur Copolymers. ACS Omega 3:3330–3339. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0003110.1021/acsomega.8b00031 ↗
84. Loeh MO, Badaczewski F, Faber K, Hintner S, Bertino MF, Mueller P, Metz J, Smarsly BM (2016) Analysis of thermally induced changes in the structure of coal tar pitches by an advanced evaluation method of X-ray scattering data. Carbon N Y 109:823–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.03110.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.031 ↗
85. Shen Y, Chen B (2015) Sulfonated Graphene Nanosheets as a Superb Adsorbent for Various Environmental Pollutants in Water. Environ Sci Technol 49:7364–7372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b0105710.1021/acs.est.5b01057 ↗
86. Yan R, Antonietti M, Oschatz M (2018) Toward the Experimental Understanding of the Energy Storage Mechanism and Ion Dynamics in Ionic Liquid Based Supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20180002610.1002/aenm.201800026 ↗
87. Du Y, Wooler B, Smith SE, Raich B, Chase CE, Wang L, Kliewer C, Mao K (2021) Synthesis of sulfur-doped porous carbon from heavy coker gas oil and its application in CO2capture. Mater Adv 2:248–252. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00859a10.1039/d0ma00859a ↗
88. Zaman AC (2023) Hydroxybenzoic acid derived porous carbons for low pressure CO 2 capture. J Solid State Chem 327:124245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2023.12424510.1016/j.jssc.2023.124245 ↗
89. Liu B, Shi R, Ma X, Chen R, Zhou K, Xu X, Sheng P, Zeng Z, Li L (2021) High yield nitrogen-doped carbon monolith with rich ultramicropores prepared by in-situ activation for high performance of selective CO2 capture. Carbon N Y 181:270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.05.02910.1016/j.carbon.2021.05.029 ↗
90. Zhao Y, Liu X, Yao KX, Zhao L, Han Y (2012) Superior Capture of CO 2 Achieved by Introducing Extra-framework Cations into N-doped Microporous Carbon. Chem Mater 24:4725–4734. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm303072n10.1021/cm303072n ↗
91. Sánchez-Sánchez Á, Suárez-García F, Martínez-Alonso A, Tascón JMD (2014) Influence of porous texture and surface chemistry on the CO2 adsorption capacity of porous carbons: Acidic and basic site interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:21237–21247. https://doi.org/10.1021/am506176e10.1021/am506176e ↗
92. Cui H, Xu J, Shi J, Yan N, Liu Y (2019) Facile fabrication of nitrogen doped carbon from filter paper for CO2 adsorption. Energy 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.11593610.1016/j.energy.2019.115936 ↗
93. Shi J, Yan N, Cui H, Xu J, Liu Y, Zhang S (2019) Salt Template Synthesis of Nitrogen and Sulfur Co-Doped Porous Carbons as CO 2 Adsorbents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:19513–19521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0457410.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04574 ↗
94. Bari GAKMR, Kang HJ, Lee TG, Hwang HJ, An BH, Seo HW, Ko CH, Hong WH, Jun YS (2023) Dual-templating-derived porous carbons for low-pressure CO2 capture. Carbon Lett 33:811–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00462-x10.1007/s42823-023-00462-x ↗
95. Je SH, Buyukcakir O, Kim D, Coskun A (2016) Direct Utilization of Elemental Sulfur in the Synthesis of Microporous Polymers for Natural Gas Sweetening, Chem 1. 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2016.08.00310.1016/j.chempr.2016.08.003 ↗
96. Baek M, Shin H, Char K, Choi JW (2020) New High Donor Electrolyte for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv Mater 32. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200502210.1002/adma.202005022 ↗
97. Basnayake SA, Tan K, Leonard M, Chabal Y, Balkus KJ (2016) Encapsulation of red sulfur chromophores in a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) via solvent assisted linker exchange. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 219:172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.08.01010.1016/j.micromeso.2015.08.010 ↗
98. Fan Y, Liu D, Rahman MM, Tao T, Lei W, Mateti S, Yu B, Wang J, Yang C, Chen Y (2019) Repelling Polysulfide Ions by Boron Nitride Nanosheet Coated Separators in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:2620–2628. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b0220510.1021/acsaem.8b02205 ↗
99. He M, Yuan LX, Zhang WX, Hu XL, Huang YH (2011) Enhanced cyclability for sulfur cathode achieved by a water-soluble binder. J Phys Chem C 115:15703–15709. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204341610.1021/jp2043416 ↗
100. Yuan L, Qiu X, Chen L, Zhu W (2009) New insight into the discharge process of sulfur cathode by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Power Sources 189:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.033 ↗