AI-driven strategies for the design and functionalization of carbon nanotubes: a critical review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Aljarrah I (2024) Improving CNTs properties using computational intelligence algorithms. .Int J Mater Prod Technol 68(1/2):169–198. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmpt.2024.1006235810.1504/ijmpt.2024.10062358 ↗
2. Sabouhi R, Ghayour H, Abdellahi M, Bahmanpour M (2016) Measuring the mechanical properties of polymer-carbon nanotube composites by artificial intelligence. Int J Damage Mech 25(4):538–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951560437510.1177/1056789515604375 ↗
3. Li Y et al (2025) Transforming the synthesis of carbon nanotubes with Machine Learning Models and Automation10.1016/j.matt.2024.11.007 ↗
4. Moradikazerouni A, Hajizadeh A, Safaei MR, Afrand M, Yarmand H, Zulkifli NWBM (2019) Assessment of thermal conductivity enhancement of nano-antifreeze containing single-walled carbon nanotubes: optimal artificial neural network and curve-fitting. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 521:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.05110.1016/j.physa.2019.01.051 ↗
5. Dehghani MH, Yetilmezsoy K, Salari M, Heidarinejad Z, Yousefi M, Sillanpää M (2020) Adsorptive removal of cobalt(II) from aqueous solutions using multi-walled carbon nanotubes and γ-alumina as novel adsorbents: modelling and optimization based on response surface methodology and artificial neural network. J Mol Liq. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11215410.1016/j.molliq.2019.112154 ↗
6. Mijwel AAS, Ahmed AN, Afan HA, Alayan HM, Sherif M, Elshafie A (2023) Artificial intelligence models for methylene blue removal using functionalized carbon nanotubes. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45032-310.1038/s41598-023-45032-3 ↗
7. Chen G, Tang DM (2024) Machine learning as a ‘catalyst’ for advancements in carbon nanotube research. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1421168810.3390/nano14211688 ↗
8. Serrano C, Ulloa N, Flores C, Caicedo F (2024) Artificial intelligence for mechanical properties prediction of polyethylene-carbon nanotube composites. Math Model Eng Probl 11(5):1160. https://doi.org/10.18280/MMEP.11050410.18280/MMEP.110504 ↗
9. Imoisili PE, Makhatha ME, Jen TC (2024) Artificial intelligence prediction and optimization of the mechanical strength of modified natural fibre/MWCNT polymer nanocomposite. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 9(2):100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMD.2024.10070510.1016/J.JSAMD.2024.100705 ↗
10. Ho NX, Le TT, Le MV (2022) Development of artificial intelligence based model for the prediction of Young’s modulus of polymer/carbon-nanotubes composites. Mech Adv Mater Struct 29(27):5965–5978. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.196970910.1080/15376494.2021.1969709 ↗
11. Yao C, Zhang J, Gao L, Jin C, Wang S, Jiang W, Liang H, Feng P, Li X, Ma L, Wei H (2024) The Application of Sodium Percarbonate in Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation Enhanced by Swirl Flow Optimized by Artificial Intelligence: Carbon Nanotubes with Ni Single Atom Sites Promote the Dual Improvement of Activated Sodium Percarbonate and Silicon Resistance. Available at SSRN 459151210.2139/ssrn.4591512 ↗
12. Ganthavee V, Trzcinski AP (2024) Artificial intelligence and machine learning for the optimization of pharmaceutical wastewater treatment systems: a review. Environ Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01748-w10.1007/s10311-024-01748-w ↗
13. Vivanco-Benavides LE, Martínez-González CL, Mercado-Zúñiga C, Torres-Torres C (2022) Machine learning and materials informatics approaches in the analysis of physical properties of carbon nanotubes: a review. Comput Mater Sci 201:110939. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2021.11093910.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2021.110939 ↗
14. Khazaie A, Kia H, Moniri E, Hassani AH, Miralinaghi M (2023) Adsorption modeling of tetracycline removal by multi-walled carbon nanotube functionalized with aspartic acid and poly-pyrrole using Bayesian optimized artificial neural network. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 144:104743. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTICE.2023.10474310.1016/J.JTICE.2023.104743 ↗
15. Ghaedi AM (May 2016) Adsorption of triamterene on multi-walled and single-walled carbon nanotubes: artificial neural network modeling and genetic algorithm optimization.J Mol Liq 216:654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.06810.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.068 ↗
16. Jalali S, Baniadam M, Maghrebi M (2024) Impedance value prediction of carbon nanotube/polystyrene nanocomposites using tree-based machine learning models and the Taguchi technique. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10359910.1016/j.rineng.2024.103599 ↗
17. Akbarzadeh S, Akbarzadeh K, Ramezanzadeh M, Naderi R, Mahdavian M, Olivier MG (2023) Corrosion resistance enhancement of a sol-gel coating by incorporation of modified carbon nanotubes: artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and experimental explorations. Prog Org Coat 174:107296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PORGCOAT.2022.10729610.1016/J.PORGCOAT.2022.107296 ↗
18. Cao Y, Khadimallah MA, Ahmed M, Assilzadeh H (2024) Enhancing structural analysis and electromagnetic shielding in carbon foam composites with applications in concrete integrating XGBoost machine learning, carbon nanotubes, and montmorillonite. Synth Met 307:117656. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYNTHMET.2024.11765610.1016/J.SYNTHMET.2024.117656 ↗
19. Matos MAS, Pinho ST, Tagarielli VL (2019) Predictions of the electrical conductivity of composites of polymers and carbon nanotubes by an artificial neural network. Scr Mater 166:117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.03.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.03.003 ↗
20. Manan A, Zhang P, Ahmad S, Umar M, Raza A (2024) Machine learning prediction model integrating experimental study for compressive strength of carbon-nanotubes composites. J Eng Res (Kuwait). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.08.00710.1016/j.jer.2024.08.007 ↗
21. Champa-Bujaico E, Díez-Pascual AM, Garcia-Diaz P, Sessini V, Mosquera MEG (2024) Machine learning algorithms to optimize the properties of bio-based poly(butylene succinate-co- butylene adipate) nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes. Ind Crop Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11901810.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119018 ↗
22. Lee J, Yun H, Cha Y, Chung W (2024) Predicting self-heating temperature and influencing factors in the cement composite mixed with multi-walled carbon nanotubes using machine learning. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16231042010.3390/su162310420 ↗
23. Trujillo MCR, Alarcón TE, Dalmau OS, Zamudio Ojeda A (2017) Segmentation of carbon nanotube images through an artificial neural network. Soft Comput 21(3):611–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2426-110.1007/s00500-016-2426-1 ↗
24. Kim B, Norman TJ, Jones RS, Moon D. Il, Han JW, Meyyappan M (2019) Carboxylated single-walled carbon nanotube sensors with varying pH for the detection of ammonia and carbon dioxide using an artificial neural network. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2(10):6445–6451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b0140110.1021/acsanm.9b01401 ↗
25. Zhu X, Li Y, Gu N (2023) Application of artificial intelligence in the exploration and optimization of biomedical nanomaterials. Nano Biomed Eng 15(3):342. https://doi.org/10.26599/NBE.2023.929003510.26599/NBE.2023.9290035 ↗
26. Krasnikov DV et al (2023) Machine learning methods for aerosol synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 202:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.04410.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.044 ↗
27. Bash D et al (2020) Machine learning and high-throughput robust design of P3HT-CNT composite thin films for high electrical conductivity10.26434/chemrxiv.13265288.v1 ↗
28. Lin D (2023) Addressing the Trade-Off between crystallinity and yield in Single-Walled carbon nanotube forest synthesis using machine learning. 17(22):22821–22829. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSNANO.3C07587/SUPPL_FILE. ACS Nano/NN3C07587_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSNANO.3C07587/SUPPL_FILE ↗
29. Ji ZH ( 2021) High-throughput screening and machine learning for the efficient growth of high-quality single-wall carbon nanotubes. 14(12):4610–4615. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12274-021-3387-Y/METRICS. .Nano Res10.1007/S12274-021-3387-Y/METRICS ↗
30. Oliveira MG, Spaolonzi MP, Duarte EDV, da Silva MGC, Vieira MGA (2024) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin onto green multi-walled carbon nanotubes in single and multi-component systems: equilibrium study and machine learning modeling. J Clean Prod 456:142414. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.14241410.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.142414 ↗
31. Mofakhami M, Aghaei A, Yaghmaee MS (2019) Modeling the prediction of flux and fouling parameters of PVDF nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes with carbon nanotubes using artificial intelligence networks. 28(103):5–9. https://doi.org/10.22078/pr.2018.2937.237410.22078/pr.2018.2937.2374 ↗
32. Khataee AR, Vahid B, Behjati B, Safarpour M (2013) Treatment of a dye solution using photoelectro-fenton process on the cathode containing carbon nanotubes under re circulation mode: investigation of operational parameters and artificial neural network modeling. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 32(3):557–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1165710.1002/ep.11657 ↗
33. Sujaree K (2020) Artificial carbon nanotube synthesis optimization to address the vaccine cold chain network problem. Int J Mod Optim 32–40. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMO.2020.V10.74310.7763/IJMO.2020.V10.743 ↗
34. Ghaedi M, Dashtian K, Ghaedi AM, Dehghanian N (2016) A hybrid model of support vector regression with genetic algorithm for forecasting adsorption of malachite green onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes: central composite design optimization. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18(19):13310–13321. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp01531j10.1039/c6cp01531j ↗
35. Fereidoon A, Mashhadzadeh AH, Rostamiyan Y (2013) Experimental, modeling and optimization study on the mechanical properties of epoxy/highimpact polystyrene/multi-Walled carbon nanotube ternary nanocomposite using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Sci Eng Compos Mater 20(3):265–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2012-017810.1515/secm-2012-0178 ↗
36. Afrand M, Ahmadi Nadooshan A, Hassani M, Yarmand H, Dahari M (2016) Predicting the viscosity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/water nanofluid by developing an optimal artificial neural network based on experimental data. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 77:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.07.00810.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.07.008 ↗
37. Hemmat Esfe M, Kamyab MH, Afrand M, Amiri MK (2018) Using artificial neural network for investigating of concurrent effects of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and alumina nanoparticles on the viscosity of 10W-40 engine oil. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 510:610–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.02910.1016/j.physa.2018.06.029 ↗
38. Razavi SM, Sadollah A, Al-Shamiri AK (2022) Prediction and optimization of electrical conductivity for polymer-based composites using design of experiment and artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 34(10):7653–7671. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00521-021-06798-7/METRICS10.1007/S00521-021-06798-7/METRICS ↗
39. Imoisili PE, Adeleke O, Makhatha ME, Jen TC (2023) Response surface methodology (RSM)- artificial neural networks (ANN) aided prediction of the impact strength of natural fibre/carbon nanotubes hybrid reinforced polymer nanocomposite. Engineered Science 23:852. https://doi.org/10.30919/ES8D85210.30919/ES8D852 ↗
40. Le TT (2021) Prediction of tensile strength of polymer carbon nanotube composites using practical machine learning method. J Compos Mater 55(6):787–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832095354010.1177/0021998320953540 ↗
41. Chu D, Ji Z, Zhang X, Zhao X, He Y, Bai W (2023) Machine learning for the regulation strategy and mechanism of the integrated growth of carbon nanotube arrays. New J Chem 47(47):21883–21896. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NJ04124G10.1039/D3NJ04124G ↗
42. Iakovlev VY, Krasnikov DV, Khabushev EM, Kolodiazhnaia JV, Nasibulin AG (2019) Artificial neural network for predictive synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes by aerosol CVD method. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.01310.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.013 ↗
43. Yao C et al (2024) Enhancing sodium percarbonate catalytic wet peroxide oxidation with artificial intelligence-optimized swirl flow: Ni single atom sites on carbon nanotubes for improved reactivity and silicon resistance. Chemosphere 346:140606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2023.14060610.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2023.140606 ↗
44. Vaddar L et al (2023) Glass Fiber-Epoxy Composites with Carbon Nanotube Fillers for Enhancing Properties in Structure Modeling and Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence Technique, ACS Omega 8(26):23528–23544. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0106710.1021/acsomega.3c01067 ↗
45. Zhu F, Wu X, Lu Y, Huang J (2024) Strength estimation and feature interaction of carbon nanotubes-modified concrete using artificial intelligence-based boosting ensembles. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1401013410.3390/buildings14010134 ↗
46. Maqsood K et al (2022) Multi-objective optimization of thermophysical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes based nanofluids. Chemosphere 286:131690. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.13169010.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.131690 ↗
47. Hemmat Esfe M, Motahari K, Sanatizadeh E, Afrand M, Rostamian H, Reza Hassani Ahangar M (2016) Estimation of thermal conductivity of CNTs-water in low temperature by artificial neural network and correlation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 76:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.12.01210.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.12.012 ↗
48. Alnaqi AA, Sayyad Tavoos Hal S, Aghaei A, Soltanimehr M, Afrand M, Nguyen TK (2019) Predicting the effect of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes on thermal performance factor of water under various Reynolds number using artificial neural network. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 521:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.05710.1016/j.physa.2019.01.057 ↗
49. Mijwel AAS et al (2025) Artificial intelligence -driven insights into bisphenol A removal using synthesized carbon nanotubes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 383:113411. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROMESO.2024.11341110.1016/J.MICROMESO.2024.113411 ↗
50. Kim M et al (2022) Detection of ovarian cancer via the spectral fingerprinting of quantum-defect-modified carbon nanotubes in serum by machine learning. Nat Biomed Eng 6(3):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00860-y10.1038/s41551-022-00860-y ↗
51. Khabushev EM, Krasnikov DV, Zaremba OT, Tsapenko AP, Goldt AE, Nasibulin AG (2019) Machine learning for tailoring optoelectronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotube films. J Phys Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0277710.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02777 ↗
52. Acı M, Avcı M (2016) Artificial neural network approach for atomic coordinate prediction of carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 122(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0153-110.1007/s00339-016-0153-1 ↗
53. Hassan MR (2015) Modeling of moisture damage in carbon nano tube modified asphalt using hybrid of artificial neural network and other computational intelligence approaches. J Comput Theor Nanosci 12(11):4927–4934. https://doi.org/10.1166/JCTN.2015.446110.1166/JCTN.2015.4461 ↗
54. Kotzabasaki M, Sotiropoulos I, Charitidis C, Sarimveis H (2021) Machine learning methods for multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) genotoxicity prediction. Nanoscale Adv 3(11):3167–3176. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0na00600a10.1039/d0na00600a ↗
55. Chang J (2020) Efficient closed-loop maximization of carbon nanotube growth rate using Bayesian optimization. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64397-310.1038/s41598-020-64397-3 ↗
56. DeMille KJ, Hall R, Leigh JR, Guven I, Spear AD (2024) Materials design using genetic algorithms informed by convolutional neural networks: application to carbon nanotube bundles. Compos Part B Eng 286:111751. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2024.11175110.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2024.111751 ↗
57. Xiang Y, Shimoyama K, Shirasu K, Yamamoto G (2020) Machine learning-assisted high-throughput molecular dynamics simulation of high-mechanical performance carbon nanotube structure. Nanomaterials 10(12):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1012245910.3390/nano10122459 ↗
58. Hassanzadeh Z, Kompany-Zareh M, Ghavami R, Gholami S, Malek-Khatabi A (2015) Combining radial basis function neural network with genetic algorithm to QSPR modeling of adsorption on multi-walled carbon nanotubes surface. J Mol Struct 1098:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.05.03910.1016/j.molstruc.2015.05.039 ↗
59. González-Durruthy M et al (2017) Experimental-computational study of carbon nanotube effects on mitochondrial respiration: in silico nano-QSPR machine learning models based on new Raman spectra transform with Markov-Shannon entropy invariants. J Chem Inf Model 57(5):1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b0045810.1021/acs.jcim.6b00458 ↗
60. Okasha NM, Mirrashid M, Naderpour H, Ciftcioglu AO, Meddage DPP, Ezami N (2024) Machine learning approach to predict the mechanical properties of cementitious materials containing carbon nanotubes. Developments in the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.10049410.1016/j.dibe.2024.100494 ↗
61. Bagherzadeh F, Shafighfard T (2022) Ensemble machine learning approach for evaluating the material characterization of carbon nanotube-reinforced cementitious composites. Case Studies in Construction Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0153710.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01537 ↗
62. Fakhrabadi MMS, Samadzadeh M, Rastgoo A, Yazdi MH, Mashadi M. Mosavi (2011) Vibrational analysis of carbon nanotubes using molecular mechanics and artificial neural network. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct 44(3):565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2011.10.00410.1016/j.physe.2011.10.004 ↗
63. Modekwe HU, Akintola AT, Ayeleru OO, Mamo MA, Daramola MO, Moothi K (2024) Artificial neural network for predicting the performance of waste polypropylene plastic-derived carbon nanotubes. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05868-210.1007/s13762-024-05868-2 ↗
64. Zarei M, Khataee AR, Ordikhani-Seyedlar R, Fathinia M (2010) Photoelectro-Fenton combined with photocatalytic process for degradation of an azo dye using supported TiO2 nanoparticles and carbon nanotube cathode: neural network modeling. Electrochim Acta 55(24):7259–7265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.05010.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.050 ↗
65. Zhang J, Perrin ML, Barba L, Overbeck J, Jung S, Grassy B, Agal A, Muff R, Brönnimann R, Haluska M et al (2022) High-speed identification of suspended carbon nanotubes using Raman spectroscopy and deep learning. Microsyst Nanoeng 8:1910.1038/s41378-022-00350-w ↗
66. Nguyen NP, Surya R, Maschmann M, Calyam P, Palaniappan K, Bunyak F (2022) Self-supervised orientation-guided deep network for segmentation of carbon nanotubes in sem imagery. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 412–428. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland10.1007/978-3-031-25085-9_24 ↗
67. Hajilounezhad Taher, Bao Rina, Palaniappan Kannappan, Bunyak Filiz, Calyam Prasad, Maschmann Matthew R. (2021) Predicting carbon nanotube forest attributes and mechanical properties using simulated images and deep learning. NPJ Comput Mater 7(1):13410.1038/s41524-021-00603-8 ↗