Additive Fabrication of Large-Scale Customizable Formwork Using Robotic Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Winding
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the established system of concrete-filled fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tube (CFFT) in civil engineering and construction industry, this research presents a novel fabrication method for freeform FRP formwork through an additive process of winding FRP fabric with industrial robots. Different from the filament winding or fused deposition modeling process in additive manufacture, large-scale formwork is fabricated with layered winding of FRP fabric and simultaneously applying fast cure epoxy resin in the proposed methods. It increases the fabrication speed and material efficiency compared with the typical fabrication process of FRP formworks, and achieved the geometry flexibility from the numerically controlled additive process. The fabrication methods are developed through a series of preliminary tests, exploring the appropriate fabrication parameters, such as the overlapping height of each layer, winding speed, and epoxy resin type. Two additional prototypes addressing geometrical flexibility are also fabricated. Based on the feasibility studies, the article discussed the potential application of this system on a double-skin tubular arch (DSTA) bridge and a tree-like topological optimized column as the future outlook of this method. As developed based on the established construction systems such as CFFTs and DSTAs, not only the proposed system is compatible with current structure and construction system, but it also benefits from combining an off-shelf material with a flexible and accurate programmable robotic process. This research contributes to the scope of additive manufacturing system by targeting the fabrication of nonuniform optimized large-scale structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Center for Innovative Structures and Materials, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Architecture and Urban Design, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Architecture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Bao DW Yan X Snooks R et al. Bioinspired Generative Architectural Design Form-Finding and Advanced Robotic Fabrication Based on Structural Performance. Architectural Intelligence: Springer 2020 pp. 147–170.10.1007/978-981-15-6568-7_10 ↗
2. Schipper H Grünewald S. Efficient material use through smart flexible formwork method. In: ECO-Crete: International Symposium on Environmentally Friendly Concrete. Reykjavik Iceland 2014. Available from: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A5f767d7f-6ad1-4e37-9efc-1817e9561274
3. Gaudillière N Duballet R Bouyssou C et al. Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete of Integrated Formwork for Truss-Shaped Pillars. Robotic Fabrication in Architecture Art and Design 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2019.10.1007/978-3-319-92294-2_35 ↗
4. Concrete choreography. Innovative Materials. 2019; 5:4–5.
5. McKinsey and Company. Imagining Construction's Digital Future 2020 [cited December 21 2020]. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-future.
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000001210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000012 ↗
7. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.617.23310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.617.233 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.00710.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.007 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000043910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000439 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.004 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443) ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2007.04.001 ↗
13. De Waal L, , Jiang S, , Torres J, et al. Design and construction of a hybrid double-skin tubular arch bridge. 9th International Conference on Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites in Civil Engineering, CICE, 2018; Paris, France: International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC), 2018. pp. 878–887.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000050210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000502 ↗
15. 10.15554/pcij.07012006.42.5410.15554/pcij.07012006.42.54 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.12.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.12.012 ↗
17. Wikipedia. Filament winding 2020 [cited December 20 2020]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filament_winding.
18. Koussios S Beukers A. Filament inding: Design Materials Structures and Manufacturing Processes. Wiley Encyclopedia of Composites. Hoboken NJ US: John Wiley & Sons; 2012 pp. 1–16.10.1002/9781118097298.weoc088 ↗
19. 10.1016/B978-0-08-096701-1.00236-610.1016/B978-0-08-096701-1.00236-6 ↗
20. ICD University of Stuttgart. BUGA Fibre Pavilion 2019 2019. Available from: https://www.icd.uni-stuttgart.de/projects/buga-fiber-pavilion/.
21. MasterBond. Wet Lay-up/Hand Lay-up Manufacturing Process for Composites 2020 [cited December 20 2020]. Available from: https://www.masterbond.com/industries/wet-lay-uphand-lay-manufacturing-process-composites.
22. Mazumdar SK. Composites Manufacturing: Materials Product and Process Engineering. Boca Raton FL US: CRC Press; 2002 December 27 2001. p. 416.10.1201/9781420041989 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000058810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000588 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000057110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000571 ↗
25. ScienceDirect. Pultrusion: Elsevier B.V.; 2020 [cited December 20 2020]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/pultrusion.
26. Ramôa Correia J. Pultrusion of advanced fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. In: Bai J ed. Advanced Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Structural Applications. Sawston Cambridge UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2013 pp. 207–251.10.1533/9780857098641.2.207 ↗
27. Burry J, , Felicetti P, , Tang J, et al. Dynamical structural modeling: A collaborative design dxploration. 2005; 3:27–42.
28. Bendsoe MP Sigmund O. Topology Optimization—Theory Methods and Applications 2nd ed. Heidelberg Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2004.
29. Bao DW, , Yan X, , Snooks R, et al. Design and Construction of an Innovative Pavilion Using Topological Optimization and Robotic Fabrication. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia; 2019: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS).
30. Lloret E, , Shahab AR, , Linus M, et al. Complex concrete structures: Merging existing casting techniques with digital fabrication. CAD, 2015; 60:40–49.
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10089410.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40684-018-0005-x10.1007/s40684-018-0005-x ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20130140010.1002/adma.201301400 ↗
34. Gibson I Rosen D Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies 3D Printing Rapid Prototyping and Direct Digital Manufacturing. New York NY US: Springer; 2015.10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
35. Yu L Luo D Xu W. Dynamic Robotic Slip-Form Casting and Eco-Friendly Building Façade Design. Cham: Springer International Publishing;. 2019.10.1007/978-3-319-92294-2_32 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10403710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104037 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.02010.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.020 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.02010.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.020 ↗
39. Kayser M, , Cai L, , Bader C, et al. Fiberbots: Design and digital fabrication of tubular structures using robot swarms. In: Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design, New York, NY, US: Springer; 2018.
40. Peters B. Additive formwork: 3D printed flexible formwork. ACADIA 14: Design Agency. Los Angeles: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture; 2014 pp. 23–25.10.52842/conf.acadia.2014.517 ↗
41. 10.1089/3dp.2019.019710.1089/3dp.2019.0197 ↗
42. Hack NP. Mesh Mould: A Robotically Fabricated Structural Stay-in-Place Formwork System. Zurich Switzerland: ETH Zurich; 2018.10.2307/j.ctt1tp3c5w.31 ↗
43. Yu L Luo D Xu W. Dynamic Robotic Slip-Form Casting and Eco-Friendly Building Façade Design. Robotic Fabrication in Architecture Art and Design. New York NY US: Springer; 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-92294-2_32 ↗
44. Lloret-Fritschi E, , Scotto F, , Gramazio F, et al. Challenges of real-scale production with smart dynamic casting. RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication. New York, NY, US: Springer; 2018.
45. Robots in Architecture. KUKA|PRC 2020 [cited December 21 2020]. Available from: https://www.robotsinarchitecture.org/kuka-prc.
46. Rutten D. Grasshopper-Algorithmic modeling for Rhino 2020 [cited December 21 2020]. Available from: https://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
47. Robert McNeel & Associates. RhinocerosR 2020 [cited 2020 21 December]. Available from: https://www.rhino3d.com/.
48. Gurit AG . Ampreg 22 Epoxy Laminating System. In: Gurit AG ed. 2018.
49. D2290-19a A. Standard Test Method for Apparent Hoop Tensile Strength of Plastic or Reinforced Plastic Pipe Active Standard. West Conshohocken PA United States: ASTM International; 2019.
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.015 ↗
51. Huang X Xie YM. Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization Method. Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures. Hoboken NJ US: John Wiley & Sons; 2010 pp. 17–38.10.1002/9780470689486.ch3 ↗